QuoteHillary 'Bonds of Trust' Speech Draws Praise, Guffaws


The conservative NewsBusters website noted that the Vox author left out a line that received ridicule on Twitter:

"We must urgently begin to rebuild the bonds of trust and respect among Americans. Between police and citizens, yes, but also across society, restoring trust in our politics, our press, our markets, between and among neighbors and even people with whom we disagree politically."

National Journal's Ron Fournier wasn't impressed with that line either.

"I banged my head on my computer when I saw that," Fournier said on Fox News Channel's "Special Report," adding that Clinton's actions are "an assault on the public trust."

"If you're someone like me who actually thinks judicial reform is a very important policy and actually agrees a lot with what she had to say, this is especially frustrating because you can't lead, you can't get anything done if you can't be trusted," Fournier said. Clinton has violated ethics laws on both her personal emails and in foreign donations for the Clinton Foundation, he said.

'You can't on one hand talk about how we have to mend our political nature and mend our political ways and literally be assaulting the public trust," Fournier said.

Clinton still might be able to win the election if she is unable to get the controversy over donations to the foundation and her emails behind her, Fournier admitted.

"Fifty-one percent of the public may find the Republican nominee even less acceptable, even more repulsive than the Democratic nominee," he said. "So you've won the election and then what do you have? You're leading a country that is more polarized and has less trust in politics than you did before you came into office, and won't be able to get anything done."

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/hillary-clinton-speech-trust-society/2015/04/29/id/641628/#ixzz3YkOu2aMj

'Bonds of Trust' 

Too funny!!:lol:

Quote from: kroz on April 28, 2015, 05:54:24 PM

Absolutely no way!!  Obama doesn't take one for anyone!

He will in this case....look at all he's gotten away with, Obamao will step up and claim it was his idea to clear the way for Hillary to carry on the policies of destroying the country they both hate so much.

What is anybody gonna do....he's a lame duck.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 30, 2015, 05:00:53 PM
He will in this case....look at all he's gotten away with, Obamao will step up and claim it was his idea to clear the way for Hillary to carry on the policies of destroying the country they both hate so much.

What is anybody gonna do....he's a lame duck.

I just don't believe it is in his DNA......

You've got to know that he loathes the Clintons.  I suspect that there will be another candidate surface for the democrat ticket and THAT person may well get Obama's full support.  Hillary's hole just keeps getting deeper and deeper.  They are going to be forced to provide an alternative.  If they wait till the last minute, it could be Elizabeth Warren.  She doesn't need to declare early if she has Obama and his money behind her candidacy.  JMHO...

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 30, 2015, 05:00:53 PM
He will in this case....look at all he's gotten away with, Obamao will step up and claim it was his idea to clear the way for Hillary to carry on the policies of destroying the country they both hate so much.

What is anybody gonna do....he's a lame duck.

Naw! Obama is about Obama! Bill hates Obama and Obama hates the Clintons! Someone else is going to run and will get Obama's full support! Not Sanders but someone else! I still lay my money on Kerry after they pull off their Iranian deal and sell it to the low info voters as the greatest thing ever!!

Quote from: kroz on April 30, 2015, 05:11:47 PM
I just don't believe it is in his DNA......

You've got to know that he loathes the Clintons.  I suspect that there will be another candidate surface for the democrat ticket and THAT person may well get Obama's full support.  Hillary's hole just keeps getting deeper and deeper.  They are going to be forced to provide an alternative.  If they wait till the last minute, it could be Elizabeth Warren.  She doesn't need to declare early if she has Obama and his money behind her candidacy.  JMHO...

Oh sure he hates the Clintonista's....but politics makes strange bedfellows....if he didn't want Hillary to be the next President he would have never empowered her with the high profile position of Secretary of State. The problem is Hilary messed up Libya so bad that not even Obamao thought it would turn out that bad. It almost cost him the second term.
Hillary's resigning was the best thing she could have done to "save" her future bid.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 30, 2015, 05:40:54 PM
Oh sure he hates the Clintonista's....but politics makes strange bedfellows....if he didn't want Hillary to be the next President he would have never empowered her with the high profile position of Secretary of State. The problem is Hilary messed up Libya so bad that not even Obamao thought it would turn out that bad. It almost cost him the second term.
Hillary's resigning was the best thing she could have done to "save" her future bid.

Hillary's appointment was payback for the Clintons support in 2008 in the general! Doesn't mean he ever liked her! He will toss her under the bus faster then all his other supporters that embarrassed  him in the past! Some of the leaks have been attributed to the white house including the e-mail server scandal.

Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 30, 2015, 05:40:54 PM
Oh sure he hates the Clintonista's....but politics makes strange bedfellows....if he didn't want Hillary to be the next President he would have never empowered her with the high profile position of Secretary of State. The problem is Hilary messed up Libya so bad that not even Obamao thought it would turn out that bad. It almost cost him the second term.
Hillary's resigning was the best thing she could have done to "save" her future bid.

Ohh..  I think you misjudge Obama completely.

He didn't put Hillary in as his Secretary of State to help her career.  He put her there so he could keep her under his thumb.  She could not undermine his presidency if she was part of it.  And he would be constantly looking over her shoulder and calling the shots.  She was virtually his prisoner and that is why she quit.  She took the job because she wanted it on her resume' but she knew it would be a bugger bear under Obama.  Obama purely wanted to control her.  And that is exactly what he did..... she was forced to perpetrate his Benghazi lie and his Russia reset and many more things.  She was just a puppet.  She had no real authority in that role.

But, she will carry the baggage from that job.  In retrospect she wishes she had never taken that job!

Quote from: kroz on April 30, 2015, 06:10:51 PM
Ohh..  I think you misjudge Obama completely.

He didn't put Hillary in as his Secretary of State to help her career.  He put her there so he could keep her under his thumb.  She could not undermine his presidency if she was part of it.  And he would be constantly looking over her shoulder and calling the shots.  She was virtually his prisoner and that is why she quit.  She took the job because she wanted it on her resume' but she knew it would be a bugger bear under Obama.  Obama purely wanted to control her.  And that is exactly what he did..... she was forced to perpetrate his Benghazi lie and his Russia reset and many more things.  She was just a puppet.  She had no real authority in that role.

But, she will carry the baggage from that job.  In retrospect she wishes she had never taken that job!

No, I think the Benghazi lie and Russia reset was all Hillary! The you tube video? Her way of distracting from the real truth! The Reset Button? Hers too! She was a lousy secretary of state!

Quote from: redbeard on April 30, 2015, 06:23:02 PM
No, I think the Benghazi lie and Russia reset was all Hillary! The you tube video? Her way of distracting from the real truth! The Reset Button? Hers too! She was a lousy secretary of state!

The Benghazi lie was definitely Obama's doing.  He did not want any military intervention in Benghazi and when it went wrong he created a lie to cover his own ass.  He was the one calling the shots on the night of the attack and he was desperate to make it look like something it was not.  I do not believe Hillary created that lie at all.  It was Obama that needed Americans to believe it was just a protest against a video.

The video was a perfect villain for Obama because it was anti-islam and he hates anything anti-islam.  He got to put an innocent man in jail on trumped up charges!

I will never believe that anyone but Obama was behind the Benghazi lie.

In all likelihood he was probably the reason why Hillary denied extra security for the Ambassador.  Obama was probably giving the Egyptian MB an open door.  The only thing that went wrong was that the navy seals disobeyed their orders to "stand down".  Obama was not expecting that.   

Quote from: kroz on April 30, 2015, 06:36:22 PM
The Benghazi lie was definitely Obama's doing.  He did not want any military intervention in Benghazi and when it went wrong he created a lie to cover his own ass.  He was the one calling the shots on the night of the attack and he was desperate to make it look like something it was not.  I do not believe Hillary created that lie at all.  It was Obama that needed Americans to believe it was just a protest against a video.

The video was a perfect villain for Obama because it was anti-islam and he hates anything anti-islam.  He got to put an innocent man in jail on trumped up charges!

I will never believe that anyone but Obama was behind the Benghazi lie.

In all likelihood he was probably the reason why Hillary denied extra security for the Ambassador.  Obama was probably giving the Egyptian MB an open door.  The only thing that went wrong was that the navy seals disobeyed their orders to "stand down".  Obama was not expecting that.   

I agree. In six plus years we have learned that Obama/Jarrett try to control everything. The Libya deal was all Obama and Hillary just went along. We still don't know what Obama was doing that night.

Quote from: kroz on April 30, 2015, 06:36:22 PM
The Benghazi lie was definitely Obama's doing.  He did not want any military intervention in Benghazi and when it went wrong he created a lie to cover his own ass.  He was the one calling the shots on the night of the attack and he was desperate to make it look like something it was not.  I do not believe Hillary created that lie at all.  It was Obama that needed Americans to believe it was just a protest against a video.

The video was a perfect villain for Obama because it was anti-islam and he hates anything anti-islam.  He got to put an innocent man in jail on trumped up charges!

I will never believe that anyone but Obama was behind the Benghazi lie.

In all likelihood he was probably the reason why Hillary denied extra security for the Ambassador.  Obama was probably giving the Egyptian MB an open door.  The only thing that went wrong was that the navy seals disobeyed their orders to "stand down".  Obama was not expecting that.   

I agree!  There is no way that on the evening of SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2012, a little more than a month before Obama's reelection, that Obama was briefed about  what was occurring and went to bed, allowing others to handle it.  Obama had campaigned on AL QUADA IS DEAD AND I (personally) KILLED OSAMA BIN LADIN!   What sort of IDIOT would not be preparred for a retaliatory strike by AL Quada on the anniversary of their successful attacks on 9/11 2001.  One doesn't have to be a genuis to figure out that maybe, just possibly, the Muscum Terrorist might be a wee bit pissed at Obama bragging to the world about killing their Figurehead Leader and missing an opportunity to try to cause him political harm on the eve of his reelection.

Hillary was the person that was suppose to keep his tail out of this crack and Obama's' reelection cover story was that he was out of the loop. 

Boy, wouldn't it be something if Snowden had transcripts of texts between Obama and Clinton during the night of 9/11/2012.  (isn't it the NSA that encypted Obama''s Blackberry?)  If so, it would certainly explain why Obama told the Russian President to "tell Vladimir I will be able to be more flexible after the election".  It would explain why Obama has done nothing to stop Putin from doing anything he wants! 

Quote from: wally on May 01, 2015, 06:22:40 AM
I agree!  There is no way that on the evening of SEPTEMBER 11TH, 2012, a little more than a month before Obama's reelection, that Obama was briefed about  what was occurring and went to bed, allowing others to handle it.  Obama had campaigned on AL QUADA IS DEAD AND I (personally) KILLED OSAMA BIN LADIN!   What sort of IDIOT would not be preparred for a retaliatory strike by AL Quada on the anniversary of their successful attacks on 9/11 2001.  One doesn't have to be a genuis to figure out that maybe, just possibly, the Muscum Terrorist might be a wee bit pissed at Obama bragging to the world about killing their Figurehead Leader and missing an opportunity to try to cause him political harm on the eve of his reelection.

Hillary was the person that was suppose to keep his tail out of this crack and Obama's' reelection cover story was that he was out of the loop. 

Boy, wouldn't it be something if Snowden had transcripts of texts between Obama and Clinton during the night of 9/11/2012.  (isn't it the NSA that encypted Obama''s Blackberry?)  If so, it would certainly explain why Obama told the Russian President to "tell Vladimir I will be able to be more flexible after the election".  It would explain why Obama has done nothing to stop Putin from doing anything he wants!

I have often thought the same thing, wally.  Where is Snowden when we need him???   

Quote from: kroz on May 01, 2015, 05:48:46 PM
I have often thought the same thing, wally.  Where is Snowden when we need him???   

Probably waiting to unload damaging info against Republicans. Snowden is not exactly a showroom model for conservatives: the majority of leaks involve what happened on Bush's watch.

Quote from: quiller on May 02, 2015, 05:38:44 AM
Probably waiting to unload damaging info against Republicans. Snowden is not exactly a showroom model for conservatives: the majority of leaks involve what happened on Bush's watch.

Bush was no friend of Conservatives either.
I still applaud Snowden for giving us solid evidence that our govt is not here to help, and waking up an entire generation to the future of a potential 1984 scenario.

Quote from: Solar on May 02, 2015, 06:44:23 AM
Bush was no friend of Conservatives either.
I still applaud Snowden for giving us solid evidence that our govt is not here to help, and waking up an entire generation to the future of a potential 1984 scenario.

(*genteel snork*) I don't know where YOU got YOUR schoolin', podnuh, but I read "1984" and "Brave New World" in eighth, ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth grades, and each new reading brought fresh insights into where we were headed. For example: author Eric Blair ("George Orwell") was a committed socialist. Today, socialists try everything they can to ignore his predictions, whereas the public itself cannot.

By the time it came out that NSA and ATT were lockstepping to intercept ALL, repeat ALL undersea cable traffic (the preferred data transmission method even today for the biggest banks), that die of government snooping was already cast...years before Snowden. The difference between that sort of snooping and what happens to private citizens is, of course, the real meat in these debates.

Were Snowden's disclosures more damaging to government credibility, or to national security? I say the latter, whereas you rightly do point out the damage to the former. The true extent of what Snowden did acquire is not yet known, but the closer to Election 2016 it's probable his most damaging-to-Republicans material is sure to leak out.

Lest I be accused of waffling so hard I need butter and syrup, let me also say Snowden should be hanged within ten minutes of reaching U.S. soil. But yea verily, the only thing different with him is the volume of material and the league of treasonists willing to help him.