Quote from: Solar on January 30, 2022, 03:49:14 PM

As I keep saying, that is a question best answered by the court.

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 30, 2022, 03:55:43 PMAs I keep saying, that is a question best answered by the court.

We don't believe in just sitting on our butt and waiting for the court. We can see the evidence and make up our own mind. States are changing their laws to make sure this does not happen again. I gave you a small list of states that admitted that fraud occurred there,

Quote from: Possum on January 30, 2022, 03:59:11 PMWe don't believe in just sitting on our butt and waiting for the court. We can see the evidence and make up our own mind. States are changing their laws to make sure this does not happen again. I gave you a small list of states that admitted that fraud occurred there,

Wouldn't that violate the essence of the rule of law that the founders established? It is the same as the rule that a person is presumed to be innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 30, 2022, 03:55:43 PMAs I keep saying, that is a question best answered by the court.

Nope! In this country, we're a Republic, a govt of laws, and the law comes before the court!
When we're ready, the election will be voided, it really is that simple.

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 30, 2022, 06:35:11 PMWouldn't that violate the essence of the rule of law that the founders established? It is the same as the rule that a person is presumed to be innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.

The constitution gives the states the right to set their election laws. The states have found convincing evidence fraud occurred so they are changing their laws to prevent it from happening again. Explain how that is a violation of the rule of law? 

Quote from: Possum on January 31, 2022, 04:05:50 AMThe constitution gives the states the right to set their election laws. The states have found convincing evidence fraud occurred so they are changing their laws to prevent it from happening again. Explain how that is a violation of the rule of law?

It is not. As long as it conforms to the Constitution, it is legal.

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 31, 2022, 05:28:28 AMIt is not. As long as it conforms to the Constitution and the allegations are upheld by the court, it is legal.

And we just ignore that Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Michigan among others have all uncovered fraud in the voting in their states? Let me try it from this angle, if you see someone uninvited in your home taking your computer and running off with it without your permission, did a theft occur or do you need a court to tell you if one did? 

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 31, 2022, 05:28:28 AMIt is not. As long as it conforms to the Constitution, it is legal.

It is, it's called States Rights!

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 31, 2022, 05:28:28 AMIt is not. As long as it conforms to the Constitution, it is legal.

What laws in which state might be illegal?

Quote from: Tory Potter on January 31, 2022, 05:28:28 AMIt is not. As long as it conforms to the Constitution, it is legal.

Possum asked how it was a violation of the rule of law. I said it is not (a violation of the rule of law. I am agreeing with you.