Now, another 'social experiment gone right', according to 'The Queen'.

Next, it will be some bulldyke nicknamed 'Butch' that will give new meaning to the term Prom 'King'.  :)) ;D

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/DC-Gay-Student-Crowned-Prom-Queen-at-Va-High-School-122872164.html

Quote from: MAC Man on May 31, 2011, 07:29:55 PM
Now, another 'social experiment gone right', according to 'The Queen'.

Next, it will be some bulldyke nicknamed 'Butch' that will give new meaning to the term Prom 'King'.  :)) ;D

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/DC-Gay-Student-Crowned-Prom-Queen-at-Va-High-School-122872164.html

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the study body elect a prom king and queen? That seems to be insinuated in the article.

TV commercials have gone full Pro Diversity at any cost with Smarmy Metrosexuial Canadien looking Guys and Gals who look as though there was not only a Kiowa Commanchee but also an Armenian in the woodpile and notice how none of the folks really fit the scenarios they are put in (Really) ...

Quote from: GreyRaceGlobalist on May 31, 2011, 07:33:29 PM
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the study body elect a prom king and queen? That seems to be insinuated in the article.

Yes, and it show how vulgar and demented "democracy," particularly when one lets minors participate in it, has become.  "Democracy" is bad enough when majors who have the brains of minors practice it.

Quote from: Berggeist on May 31, 2011, 07:45:30 PM
Yes, and it show how vulgar and demented "democracy," particularly when one lets minors participate in it, has become.  "Democracy" is bad enough when majors who have the brains of minors practice it.

Objectively it can be said that gender conventions are breaking down.

The value we place on that is a matter of opinion.

It is pragmatic to say that a male/female coupling is required for the necessary act of procreation. To say that any deviation from that pattern at any time and any mixing of roles even outside of sexual acts is unnatural is a subjective judgement.

Quote from: GreyRaceGlobalist on May 31, 2011, 07:57:02 PM
Objectively it can be said that gender conventions are breaking down.

The value we place on that is a matter of opinion.

It is pragmatic to say that a male/female coupling is required for the necessary act of procreation. To say that any deviation from that pattern at any time and any mixing of roles even outside of sexual acts is unnatural is a subjective judgement.

Subjective?
Don't kid yourself, its about sex, and nothing more!
http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/

Quote from: Solar on May 31, 2011, 08:01:18 PM
Subjective?
Don't kid yourself, its about sex, and nothing more!
http://www.zombietime.com/folsom_sf_2007_part_1/

Obviously gender identity is tied to sex, but I don't think Prom Queen is a position involving mandatory acts. They we're voting on who sleeps with the Prom King, they very voting on the prettiest most popular girl at the boy... and they voted for a boy.

The fact that some homosexuals express themselves graphically and publicly doesn't make everything about gender identity and sexual preference about graphic public displays.

My guess would be this "lady boy" was elected prom queen much in the same "thought" process that the Kenyan menace was elected president....somebody thought it would be soooo cool.... ::)


Billy

Quote from: GreyRaceGlobalist on May 31, 2011, 08:09:54 PM
Obviously gender identity is tied to sex, but I don't think Prom Queen is a position involving mandatory acts. They we're voting on who sleeps with the Prom King, they very voting on the prettiest most popular girl at the boy... and they voted for a boy.

The fact that some homosexuals express themselves graphically and publicly doesn't make everything about gender identity and sexual preference about graphic public displays.

But it is about sex, and nothing else.
Public or private, its always about sex.

Quote from: Solar on June 01, 2011, 06:51:40 AM
But it is about sex, and nothing else.
Public or private, its always about sex.

Sex as in gender or sex as in intercourse?

Quote from: GreyRaceGlobalist on June 01, 2011, 06:54:14 AM
Sex as in gender or sex as in intercourse?

I don't think gender is an issue for fags.

Quote from: GreyRaceGlobalist on June 01, 2011, 06:54:14 AM
Sex as in gender or sex as in intercourse?

You present a false dichotomy.  The true dichotomy is sex versus asexual.  Certain creatures reproduce asexually; others reproduce sexually, i.e. a male and a female.  Sex as "gender" is a meaningless abstraction.  As a meaningless abstraction, it is, as you suggested in a post supra, subjective.  Its subjectivity is comensurate with its meaninglessness.  Without a male or female, there is no sex.  At the level of DNA where we are defined there are no gays or lesbians, no transgendered, etc.  One is either a male or female, regardless of an phenomological quirkiness.  There are three-legged chickens and two-headed snakes; but they are freaks; and nature disposes of them quite rapidly.

Quote from: Berggeist on June 01, 2011, 08:13:46 AM

You present a false dichotomy.  The true dichotomy is sex versus asexual.  Certain creatures reproduce asexually; others reproduce sexually, i.e. a male and a female.  Sex as "gender" is a meaningless abstraction.  As a meaningless abstraction, it is, as you suggested in a post supra, subjective.  Its subjectivity is comensurate with its meaninglessness.  Without a male or female, there is no sex.  At the level of DNA where we are defined there are no gays or lesbians, no transgendered, etc.  One is either a male or female, regardless of an phenomological quirkiness.  There are three-legged chickens and two-headed snakes; but they are freaks; and nature disposes of them quite rapidly.

The phenomenology of hermaphroditic sexuality aside, I agree with you on a level. It is perhaps worth considering that we are operating with an exogenous technology in addition DNA. Just because DNA doesn't turn a male into a female doesn't mean that it doesn't happen in the natural world: We are making it happen.

All of this is somewhat removed form the OP. I agree that my words were poorly chosen, and while my intent was certainly not to use a logical fallacy as deceptive rhetoric, a false dichotomy is indeed what I presented.

I should have been more specific and simply asked more specifically what was intended by the use of the word "sex."

It is being said that this issue is "all about sex." I repeat that I don't believe the title of Prom Queen conveys mandatory sexual acts.

Quote from: BILLY-bONNEY on May 31, 2011, 09:30:06 PM
My guess would be this "lady boy" was elected prom queen much in the same "thought" process that the Kenyan menace was elected president....somebody thought it would be soooo cool.... ::)


Billy

Precisely.  Election for shock value alone.  It probably won't happen again now that it's no longer "new and exciting"...

Quote from: Shanghai Dan on June 01, 2011, 08:32:25 AM
Precisely.  Election for shock value alone.  It probably won't happen again now that it's no longer "new and exciting"...

Yes it will!!  I don't remember where or when it was.  But this same BS thing happy once before, so this is not the first time or will it be the last time.