What's it gonna take before Congress gets a backbone and stops this power mad branch of GODvernment?
Quote"Every time an alien votes, it may not steal an election, but it will cancel out a vote of a U.S. citizen," Kobach said.
http://www3.atr.rollcall.com/supreme-court-victory-for-voting-rights-advocates/?dcz=
People should learn the word Court.
The 9 Kings on the Supreme Court Declare State Voter ID Laws Illegal
Don't you mean the nine fools.
Quote from: red_dirt on June 29, 2015, 05:30:39 PM
The 9 Kings on the Supreme Court Declare State Voter ID Laws Illegal
Don't you mean the nine fools.
You're right, but they rule as kings.
Actually, we have 3 very good ones. People should read what Clarence Thomas wrote (since the left mocks him as "stupid")
Well after their last two rulings we shouldn't be too surprised that they would vote this way. :cursing:
Quote from: carlb on June 29, 2015, 03:39:31 PM
What's it gonna take before Congress gets a backbone and stops this power mad branch of GODvernment?
http://www3.atr.rollcall.com/supreme-court-victory-for-voting-rights-advocates/?dcz=
The topic of this thread is absolutely misleading. A state can still require proof of legal status to vote, when you go to vote.
They just can't do so, when you are at first registering to be on the rolls to vote. And even then, they only cannot do so, when you are using one particular kind of form the states may or can use to register people to vote.
Use one of the other's you still have to show proof of legal status to vote.
That's a huge difference than saying that the
Court has declared all voter ID laws to be Illegal as the title of this thread suggests.
I mean seriously, did you even bother to read your own link?
If you had you should have noted this,
QuoteThe Kansas and Arizona laws stand, meaning that people wishing to register to vote with state forms are required to show proof of citizenship. Kobach said more than 99 percent of Kansans use the state forms. "But because of the Supreme Court decision not to review the case," he added, "we do have a small limited loophole." The slim majority that uses the federal form can "refuse to provide proof of citizenship," he said, "but that will only suffice for federal elections."
Your own link says the laws stand, not that the court declared them illegal as you claim in your title. I know it's all the rage to be anti-SCOTUS, but seriously, there's enough about the truth of what SCOTUS does that should concern and even anger the people. We don't need folks flat out, bald faced lying just to throw some criticisms at a very important, equal, branch of our government. :glare: :rolleyes: :thumbdown:
Quote from: daidalos on June 29, 2015, 11:39:35 PM
The topic of this thread is absolutely misleading. A state can still require proof of legal status to vote, when you go to vote.
They just can't do so, when you are at first registering to be on the rolls to vote. And even then, they only cannot do so, when you are using one particular kind of form the states may or can use to register people to vote.
Use one of the other's you still have to show proof of legal status to vote.
That's a huge difference than saying that the
Court has declared all voter ID laws to be Illegal as the title of this thread suggests.
I mean seriously, did you even bother to read your own link?
If you had you should have noted this,
Your own link says the laws stand, not that the court declared them illegal as you claim in your title. I know it's all the rage to be anti-SCOTUS, but seriously, there's enough about the truth of what SCOTUS does that should concern and even anger the people. We don't need folks flat out, bald faced lying just to throw some criticisms at a very important, equal, branch of our government. :glare: :rolleyes: :thumbdown:
Thanx, that's what I got from this post as well. It is citing the difference in the forms you have to fill out before voting. State vs Federal forms. Also in just the two states. I know that future law suits can be pursued using these two states as the precedent but for now this was just the first steps. Sounds familiar to me in the way the left does things.
Nine Supreme Court Justices...
Nine Nazgul in the service of the Dark Lord Sauron...
Coincidence? I think not!
Quote from: daidalos on June 29, 2015, 11:39:35 PM
The topic of this thread is absolutely misleading. A state can still require proof of legal status to vote, when you go to vote.
They just can't do so, when you are at first registering to be on the rolls to vote. And even then, they only cannot do so, when you are using one particular kind of form the states may or can use to register people to vote.
Use one of the other's you still have to show proof of legal status to vote.
That's a huge difference than saying that the
Court has declared all voter ID laws to be Illegal as the title of this thread suggests.
I mean seriously, did you even bother to read your own link?
If you had you should have noted this,
Your own link says the laws stand, not that the court declared them illegal as you claim in your title. I know it's all the rage to be anti-SCOTUS, but seriously, there's enough about the truth of what SCOTUS does that should concern and even anger the people. We don't need folks flat out, bald faced lying just to throw some criticisms at a very important, equal, branch of our government. :glare: :rolleyes: :thumbdown:
Didn't the voter ID law in Wisconsin just get upheld? Why don't all these states pattern their law exactly to that one? As far as the federal voter registration form, they have to sign it under penalty of perjury. Why not beef up and enforce the perjury statute? I am sure Sherriff Joe has plenty of room and pink underwear waiting! Enforce the laws and penalties on the books! Interesting concept!
Quote from: redbeard on June 30, 2015, 11:54:49 AM
Didn't the voter ID law in Wisconsin just get upheld? Why don't all these states pattern their law exactly to that one? As far as the federal voter registration form, they have to sign it under penalty of perjury. Why not beef up and enforce the perjury statute? I am sure Sherriff Joe has plenty of room and pink underwear waiting! Enforce the laws and penalties on the books! Interesting concept!
The federal government has no interest in enforcing these laws. That's why they're throwing up roadblocks. I'll deal with Ds comments when I have access to a real computer. He really is turning into a Supremes apologist!
Okay "D" (looks like dildo to me, so I'll call you "D").
Here's what the Daily Caller says about it:
QuoteIn throwing out the case, SCOTUS uphold a Nov. 2014 ruling by the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, stating that the Election Assistance Commission — the federal agency overseeing changes to states' voter registration processes — was, "not required to grant the states' request that proof of citizenship be added to registration requirements," reports Reuters. The court believed that the federal registration form — requiring applicants to swear they are citizens under the threat of perjury — was a sufficient safe-guard against voter fraud.
Both the Obama administration and various voter-rights groups — including the League of Women Voters and the League of United Latin-American Citizens — urged the Supreme Court not the hear the case
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/29/supreme-court-throws-out-arizona-kansas-voter-id-appeal/#ixzz3eaZpDbeQ
Now, is this ruling GOOD for America, or not? Does it prevent voter fraud, or increase it?
I rest my case! :laugh: