Quote from: Solar on April 20, 2015, 08:15:36 AM
Exactly!!!
I know a lot of this comes as a surprise to many of us, but in the game of politics, it really shouldn't be a shock to anyone.
I say this, because we have to question why the Establishment rino haven't made a point of exposing it.

Answer is, they plan to use it when the time is right, which is why I had to search through lib sites to find it.
It's for this reason I despise FOX news, they will always support the Establishment, Murdoch is a huge rino, despite having solid Conservatives like Kelly in the line up.

The "E" has a plan of "Divide and Conquer", they will meticulously go about this by picking off our candidates one by one, leaving only their choice as a final option (think Mitten).
We need to be several steps ahead of their game by cutting off their supply chain so to speak, as well as killing off their candidates early on, which I think we're winning in that aspect of the war, hence the introduction of Grahmnesty.

They're possibly throwing Bush under the bus for another failure, or is that to literal of an interpretation? I don't know, but they're up to something.

I would encourage people to write emails directly to the pundits on Fox News when they undermine our candidate.  Believe it or not, it can get a response.

About four years ago I fired off an email to Karl Rove about his comments on Fox News.  To my amazement he actually replied to my email.  We then exchanged a series of about six emails.  I was furious at the way he was portraying Romney as the inevitable nominee

More recently I have emailed Brit Hume, Juan Williams, Greta Van Susteren and the Fox Newsroom.  The Newsroom actually replied to me about my comments.  It was not a form letter, but a personal exchange of information.  They even asked me to continue to provide my perspective on their work.

So, my point is that you should NEVER think your input does not matter!   People actually read their mail!  Imagine that!

Quote from: kroz on April 20, 2015, 09:00:43 AM
I would encourage people to write emails directly to the pundits on Fox News when they undermine our candidate.  Believe it or not, it can get a response.

About four years ago I fired off an email to Karl Rove about his comments on Fox News.  To my amazement he actually replied to my email.  We then exchanged a series of about six emails.  I was furious at the way he was portraying Romney as the inevitable nominee

More recently I have emailed Brit Hume, Juan Williams, Greta Van Susteren and the Fox Newsroom.  The Newsroom actually replied to me about my comments.  It was not a form letter, but a personal exchange of information.  They even asked me to continue to provide my perspective on their work.

So, my point is that you should NEVER think your input does not matter!   People actually read their mail!  Imagine that!

I forgot to mention that Megyn Kelly is NOT  that conservative.  She is in favor of gay marriage!

Walker has come out with his own immigration policy.  It is good that he is getting around to the big issues.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/


I think the weak link in this position is that it keeps all illegals and finds them all jobs.  Walker says that no new immigrants should be allowed into the Country unless they can do a job that our unemployed will not do..... that includes the current illegals.

Will that play in Peoria?

Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 02:47:20 PM
Walker has come out with his own immigration policy.  It is good that he is getting around to the big issues.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/


I think the weak link in this position is that it keeps all illegals and finds them all jobs.  Walker says that no new immigrants should be allowed into the Country unless they can do a job that our unemployed will not do..... that includes the current illegals.

Will that play in Peoria?

I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.

Quote from: Solar on April 21, 2015, 05:59:37 PM
I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.

I read the article and it is addressed! Besides regular deportation he is in favor of Self Deportation. That is accomplished by removing the reasons to stay!
An example would be to remove state benefits for illegals and to remove work permits this won't force them all, but it would force quite a few to leave like they did when the economy went south in the construction trades! Between this and regular deportations you could put a real dent in the illegal here already. This is Walkers weakest point but he is working on it!

Quote from: Solar on April 21, 2015, 05:59:37 PM
I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.

You are right.  He did not mention his intentions toward the illegals.  I misread it the first time through.

Must have been reading too fast.   

Quote from: redbeard on April 21, 2015, 06:23:06 PM
I read the article and it is addressed! Besides regular deportation he is in favor of Self Deportation. That is accomplished by removing the reasons to stay!
An example would be to remove state benefits for illegals and to remove work permits this won't force them all, but it would force quite a few to leave like they did when the economy went south in the construction trades! Between this and regular deportations you could put a real dent in the illegal here already. This is Walkers weakest point but he is working on it!

Sounds good and all, and I understand his need to clarify his stance after the mess he created over the years in flipping on the issue.
But he should have simply said, he'd finish the fence and enforce the law.

Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 06:34:27 PM
You are right.  He did not mention his intentions toward the illegals.  I misread it the first time through.

Must have been reading too fast.   

Did you watch the Video? The article was not all direct quotes. The video was him directly answering some of his intended policies. I want to see more but I don't have issue with what he said!

Quote from: redbeard on April 21, 2015, 07:12:52 PM
Did you watch the Video? The article was not all direct quotes. The video was him directly answering some of his intended policies. I want to see more but I don't have issue with what he said!

Ah-so, I just read the text.  I will go back and watch the video.  Thanks

Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 07:30:10 PM
Ah-so, I just read the text.  I will go back and watch the video.  Thanks

Could not get the video to work.  That is very strange.

Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 07:33:06 PM
Could not get the video to work.  That is very strange.

Some reason I have trouble with that site a lot too! So many video ads use a lot of your computer recourses I guess!
Scott Walker Answer On Immigration]

Here is a great interview! Answers a lot of questions!

Chris Wallace Grills Scott Walker On Immigration. Walker Admits He's 'Changed' View on Immigration

Chris Wallace Grills Scott Walker On Immigration. Walker Admits He's 'Changed' View on Immigration



Fixed links.
walks

Quote from: kit saginaw on April 18, 2015, 04:04:52 PM
If Walker's running, he'd better announce soon because he's starting to seen as a bit of a flip-flopper.  The air is leaving the room...

Ah yeah, we're used to that in Ohio, well at least in Cincy we are. Our wonderful Kasich is doing the very same thing. 
Although, to ban them from stating their opinions, would violate their First amendment rights. Let me tell ya's, the first and fastest way to turn a Free America, into the first trans American Empire, ban free speech. Particularly political free Speech.