This will be used against him in the debates.
QuoteA conservative activist has formed a new group to push for a right-to-work law in Wisconsin.
In a written statement, Lorri Pickens announced the formation of a group called Right to Work Wisconsin on Monday, saying its goal would be advancing freedom in the workforce. Pickens, who has worked for the conservative Americans for Prosperity, did not return a call or email seeking comment.
Right-to-work laws ban mandatory union shops in the private sector. Scot Ross of the liberal group One Wisconsin Now said that would make it harder for workers to make sure their working conditions are safe and equitable.
"You know, it's the same playbook from four years ago that tore Wisconsin apart," said Ross. "We saw Governor (Scott) Walker say anything to get elected. Now he and his Republican groups are launching this frontal assault on Wisconsin's middle class working men and women."
Unions warned this year that if Gov. Scott Walker won re-election, it would lead to right-to-work in Wisconsin. Three months ago, Walker flatly rejected that claim.
http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin (http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin)
Quote from: Solar on April 18, 2015, 09:59:05 AM
This will be used against him in the debates.
http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin (http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin)
Why'd he even answer the question to start with?
I mean why borrow the trouble, when clearly the federal constitution, leaves it to the states themselves to address?
Quote from: daidalos on April 18, 2015, 02:28:08 PM
Why'd he even answer the question to start with?
I mean why borrow the trouble, when clearly the federal constitution, leaves it to the states themselves to address?
It is this propensity Walker has for saying the wrong things that will make him a very weak candidate in the General Election if we nominate him! His track record has been less than impressive.
Quote from: kroz on April 18, 2015, 03:12:51 PM
It is this propensity Walker has for saying the wrong things that will make him a very weak candidate in the General Election if we nominate him! His track record has been less than impressive.
Yep, and that was a running theme by the people commenting on many of the articles relating to his statement.
If Walker's running, he'd better announce soon because he's starting to seen as a bit of a flip-flopper. The air is leaving the room...
Quote from: kit saginaw on April 18, 2015, 04:04:52 PM
If Walker's running, he'd better announce soon because he's starting to seen as a bit of a flip-flopper. The air is leaving the room...
Yeah, I noticed Cruz has managed to keep a low profile, while staying on everyone's lips with a few interviews a week.
Walker hasn't said a word in over a week. That's not good while your competition cements their support.
I touched on this in another thread concerning Walker, but I see this as a major problem, Walker is gonna be portrayed as Anti Union, a union buster etc etc, the left is gonna scare the hell out of the otherwise regular Joe or Jane who is a Union member into voting democrap. I love Walker standing up to those thugs, but I always thought the GOP would be a lot better off if they adopted a better attitude toward the Union rank and file, lots of good people in the Union, but the gangster bosses and commies scare them to the Dems every time.
If walker is the nod for Prez I guarentee you he will lose.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 18, 2015, 05:09:15 PM
I touched on this in another thread concerning Walker, but I see this as a major problem, Walker is gonna be portrayed as Anti Union, a union buster etc etc, the left is gonna scare the hell out of the otherwise regular Joe or Jane who is a Union member into voting democrap. I love Walker standing up to those thugs, but I always thought the GOP would be a lot better off if they adopted a better attitude toward the Union rank and file, lots of good people in the Union, but the gangster bosses and commies scare them to the Dems every time.
If walker is the nod for Prez I guarentee you he will lose.
Regardless of who we nominate, the Unions will be against him and try to intimidate their members into voting democrat once again. So, I don't see that as Walker's Achilles Heel. I think he will not do well in debates and will be plagued with "foot in mouth" disease.
Quote from: kroz on April 18, 2015, 06:48:57 PM
Regardless of who we nominate, the Unions will be against him and try to intimidate their members into voting democrat once again. So, I don't see that as Walker's Achilles Heel. I think he will not do well in debates and will be plagued with "foot in mouth" disease.
Agree. Big union money will always go to the democrats. However, hard working union people also are capable of thinking for themselves. Reagan went directly to the rank and file and received a lot of support from union members. Placing forth solid conservative values will attract union members.
Quote from: supsalemgr on April 19, 2015, 05:15:52 AM
Agree. Big union money will always go to the democrats. However, hard working union people also are capable of thinking for themselves. Reagan went directly to the rank and file and received a lot of support from union members. Placing forth solid conservative values will attract union members.
And that is exactly what Cruz is capable of doing! :biggrin:
Didn't Walker sign the bill making Wisconsin RTW several weeks ago? I'm wondering why this December 2014 piece is even relevant if the legislation is already law??
Quote from: Solar on April 18, 2015, 09:59:05 AM
This will be used against him in the debates.
http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin (http://www.wpr.org/newly-formed-group-will-push-right-work-law-wisconsin)
Wisconsin NPR station? pretty lousy source! It is also dated Monday, December 1, 2014, 4:00pm!
This is a lot more to the point!!
Quote Gov. Walker signs bill making Wisconsin right-to-work state
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/09/wisconsin-gov-walker-to-sign-right-to-work-bill/ (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03/09/wisconsin-gov-walker-to-sign-right-to-work-bill/)
I would say He has a great argument in support of Right to work! Wisconsin is a right to work state because of the support he gave the legislation!
Quote from: Bowhntr on April 19, 2015, 01:35:20 PM
Didn't Walker sign the bill making Wisconsin RTW several weeks ago? I'm wondering why this December 2014 piece is even relevant if the legislation is already law??
I do not have the source. However, I remember seeing a piece where Walker had already beaten the unions three times and was not going to push RTW in WI. What he had already done had neutralized the unions. The legislature is the one who was the leader in this.
Quote from: supsalemgr on April 19, 2015, 01:41:50 PM
I do not have the source. However, I remember seeing a piece where Walker had already beaten the unions three times and was not going to push RTW in WI. What he had already done had neutralized the unions. The legislature is the one who was the leader in this.
I'd like to see the source for that. He fully supported tis bill and made statements he would sign it before it came to his desk! Remember the Lib media in that state hates him and I would double check the source because of that. I defiantly wouldn't use NPR They would crucify any conservative especially a anti union one!!
Quote from: Bowhntr on April 19, 2015, 01:35:20 PM
Didn't Walker sign the bill making Wisconsin RTW several weeks ago? I'm wondering why this December 2014 piece is even relevant if the legislation is already law??
Yes he did, but the point of posting this is to show that Walker in a sense was forced into signing it.
Just like his position on illegals, he flip flopped..
Point is, this is not the person we want to back, regardless of the good he's done as Governor, he hasn't a chance at winning, and will only split the vote in the end.
walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-a...The Wall Street Journal
Mar 26, 2015 - Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said at a private dinner he backed the idea of allowing undocumented immigrants to eventually become eligible.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-at-private-new-hampshire-dinner-1427390295 (http://www.wsj.com/articles/walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-at-private-new-hampshire-dinner-1427390295)
Walker said fixing the legal immigration system should come first, but said the next step is we "gotta embrace" a "legal pathway" for those here unlawfully. He did not elaborate on what he meant.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/scott-walker-supports-path-to-citizenship-87960.html (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/scott-walker-supports-path-to-citizenship-87960.html)
Quote from: Solar on April 19, 2015, 02:28:56 PM
Yes he did, but the point of posting this is to show that Walker in a sense was forced into signing it.
Just like his position on illegals, he flip flopped..
Point is, this is not the person we want to back, regardless of the good he's done as Governor, he hasn't a chance at winning, and will only split the vote in the end.
walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-a...The Wall Street Journal
Mar 26, 2015 - Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker said at a private dinner he backed the idea of allowing undocumented immigrants to eventually become eligible.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-at-private-new-hampshire-dinner-1427390295 (http://www.wsj.com/articles/walker-backs-path-to-citizenship-at-private-new-hampshire-dinner-1427390295)
Walker said fixing the legal immigration system should come first, but said the next step is we "gotta embrace" a "legal pathway" for those here unlawfully. He did not elaborate on what he meant.
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/scott-walker-supports-path-to-citizenship-87960.html (http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/scott-walker-supports-path-to-citizenship-87960.html)
QuoteGov. Walker backs push to make Wisconsin right-to-work state
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Gov. Scott Walker backed a surprise move Friday by Republican legislators to quickly vote on making Wisconsin a right-to-work state, an action the likely 2016 presidential candidate initially said should be delayed to avoid re-igniting massive pro-union protests.
Walker had expressed concerns to leaders in the GOP-controlled Legislature that rushing the divisive proposal could distract from his agenda, and in September — during the heat of his re-election campaign — he said he wouldn't support it this session. But after a series of private meetings with lawmakers, followed by an announcement that the bill would be voted on next week, Walker's spokeswoman said he would sign it.
"Governor Walker continues to focus on budget priorities to grow our economy and to streamline state government," his spokeswoman Laurel Patrick said in an email. "With that said, Governor Walker co-sponsored right-to-work legislation as a lawmaker and supports the policy."
This article is more to the point! He wasn't against this legislation! He didn't like the timing of it because it was distracting from his budget priorities. He was just asking for them to postpone it but when they wouldn't he supported it!
Quote from: redbeard on April 19, 2015, 01:40:11 PM
Wisconsin NPR station? pretty lousy source! It is also dated Monday, December 1, 2014, 4:00pm!
This is a lot more to the point!!I would say He has a great argument in support of Right to work! Wisconsin is a right to work state because of the support he gave the legislation!
Granted it is PBS, but most right wing sites aren't telling the whole story, and covering for him will only cause us headaches in the long run.
Point is, Walker wasn't enthusiastic about signing the Bill as we've been led top believe, fact is, he asked the legislature to hold off on bringing the bill forward, and they complied up until recently when he did sign it.
Case in point, and this is probably the article I should have posted,, but haven't a clue as to why I didn't.
The vote came after Walker said in September, during his re-election campaign, that right-to-work was not a priority and wouldn't come up this session. Walker called it a distraction and feared that protests would grow as large as those in 2011 when he effectively ended collective bargaining for most public workers.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982695/Wisconsin-Republicans-send-right-work-bill-fiercely-opposed-unions-GOP-Gov-Scott-Walker-signature.html#ixzz3XnLv8lFe (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2982695/Wisconsin-Republicans-send-right-work-bill-fiercely-opposed-unions-GOP-Gov-Scott-Walker-signature.html#ixzz3XnLv8lFe)
When the debates come, you can bet this issue will come up, along with his waffling on immigration, an even bigger point of contention.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-02-23/leading-from-behind-how-years-of-denials-got-scott-walker-in-position-to-approve-right-to-work (http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2015-02-23/leading-from-behind-how-years-of-denials-got-scott-walker-in-position-to-approve-right-to-work)
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 18, 2015, 05:09:15 PM
I touched on this in another thread concerning Walker, but I see this as a major problem, Walker is gonna be portrayed as Anti Union, a union buster etc etc, the left is gonna scare the hell out of the otherwise regular Joe or Jane who is a Union member into voting democrap. I love Walker standing up to those thugs, but I always thought the GOP would be a lot better off if they adopted a better attitude toward the Union rank and file, lots of good people in the Union, but the gangster bosses and commies scare them to the Dems every time.
If walker is the nod for Prez I guarentee you he will lose.
You seem to be laboring under the delusion that most union members are union supporters. In reality most people join the union because they have to join, to hold the job. In states where they have passed Right To Work laws, the unions quickly lose over half their membership. Look at the teachers union in Wisconsin.
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on April 18, 2015, 05:09:15 PM
I touched on this in another thread concerning Walker, but I see this as a major problem, Walker is gonna be portrayed as Anti Union, a union buster etc etc, the left is gonna scare the hell out of the otherwise regular Joe or Jane who is a Union member into voting democrap. I love Walker standing up to those thugs, but I always thought the GOP would be a lot better off if they adopted a better attitude toward the Union rank and file, lots of good people in the Union, but the gangster bosses and commies scare them to the Dems every time.
If walker is the nod for Prez I guarentee you he will lose.
He has won 3 times now in a heavy union blue state. Once after taking bargaining rights from the public employee union! The real killer in his elections is he draws votes even from democrats that crossed over to support him. Go Figure!!
Okay I'm lost. Is this good or bad for Walker?
Quote from: mdgiles on April 19, 2015, 04:31:02 PM
You seem to be laboring under the delusion that most union members are union supporters. In reality most people join the union because they have to join, to hold the job. In states where they have passed Right To Work laws, the unions quickly lose over half their membership. Look at the teachers union in Wisconsin.
I'm speaking from my own experience with Unions and harkening back to my Union official Father, who was a staunch Democrat probably more conservative than anyone on this board but who hated republicans for the simple fact "they were against unions". It took a complete asshole like Lyndon B Johnson to give him a wake up call and quit voting for Dems.
I know lots of (union) people who voted for Obamao first time round simply because he was a Dem.
And whatever goes on in Wisconsin cannot be compared with the rest of America.
Bottom line is the Pubs need to court the union rank and file Like Reagan did
Quote from: The Boo Man... on April 19, 2015, 05:25:17 PM
Okay I'm lost. Is this good or bad for Walker?
Horrible, if you're referring to Reply #16.
He's in a sense, a flip flopper
Wanting the legislators to hold off on the issue, due to items Walker deemed higher priority is significantly different from opposing the issue. Walker has not once made statements in opposition to right-to-work, just in the timing of pushing it through in Wisconsin. And when the legislature went ahead and handed him the hot potato, he signed the bill into law, and went full stream ahead in defending the law.
And, as has been pointed out, not all union members are pro-union. I myself have been forced into paid membership of unions on more than one occasion, just to hold a job. The experiences has NOT left me a fan of unions. And I would be willing to wager there are more people out there who resent being forced into association than those who are grateful.
In short, IMO, Walker is no flip-flopper on the union issue, and if he were to declare candidacy, it will be more of a benefit than a hindrance.
Quote from: Solar on April 19, 2015, 06:21:59 PM
Horrible, if you're referring to Reply #16.
He's in a sense, a flip flopper
postponing while he puts the states fiscal house in order is not flip flopping. especially if you know it will pass later. I don't see why he should have to defend that. His major problem ,I agree, is in his prior stance on immigration reform. That seems to be a flip flop but I thought he had a good answer for it.
Quote from: redbeard on April 19, 2015, 02:47:45 PM
This article is more to the point! He wasn't against this legislation! He didn't like the timing of it because it was distracting from his budget priorities. He was just asking for them to postpone it but when they wouldn't he supported it!
Thanks redbeard. That was the piece I was referring to.
Quote from: zewazir on April 19, 2015, 08:56:10 PM
Wanting the legislators to hold off on the issue, due to items Walker deemed higher priority is significantly different from opposing the issue. Walker has not once made statements in opposition to right-to-work, just in the timing of pushing it through in Wisconsin. And when the legislature went ahead and handed him the hot potato, he signed the bill into law, and went full stream ahead in defending the law.
And, as has been pointed out, not all union members are pro-union. I myself have been forced into paid membership of unions on more than one occasion, just to hold a job. The experiences has NOT left me a fan of unions. And I would be willing to wager there are more people out there who resent being forced into association than those who are grateful.
In short, IMO, Walker is no flip-flopper on the union issue, and if he were to declare candidacy, it will be more of a benefit than a hindrance.
On it's face, it can easily be explained away, and that issue coupled with his stance on illegal immigration is what garners him the flip flopper label.
"It's all is about the 11 million [undocumented immigrants]," Walker told the Daily Herald. "You hear some people talk about border security and a wall and all that. To me, I don't know that you need any of that if you had a better, saner way to let people into the country in the first place."
Walker also said, "If people want to come here and work hard in this country, I don't care if you come from Mexico or Canada or Ireland or Germany or South Africa or anywhere else. I want them here."
http://immigration.usattorneys.com/conservatives-emerge-support-immigration-reform/ (http://immigration.usattorneys.com/conservatives-emerge-support-immigration-reform/)
Quote from: Solar on April 20, 2015, 05:28:17 AM
On it's face, it can easily be explained away, and that issue coupled with his stance on illegal immigration is what garners him the flip flopper label.
"It's all is about the 11 million [undocumented immigrants]," Walker told the Daily Herald. "You hear some people talk about border security and a wall and all that. To me, I don't know that you need any of that if you had a better, saner way to let people into the country in the first place."
Walker also said, "If people want to come here and work hard in this country, I don't care if you come from Mexico or Canada or Ireland or Germany or South Africa or anywhere else. I want them here."
http://immigration.usattorneys.com/conservatives-emerge-support-immigration-reform/ (http://immigration.usattorneys.com/conservatives-emerge-support-immigration-reform/)
So how do you predetermine if someone wants to work hard??
But the bigger question is WHY DO WE NEED MORE IMMIGRANTS with this high unemployment rate?
On what planet does he live?
Quote from: kroz on April 20, 2015, 06:59:48 AM
So how do you predetermine if someone wants to work hard??
But the bigger question is WHY DO WE NEED MORE IMMIGRANTS with this high unemployment rate?
On what planet does he live?
Yep. They broke the law, and he wants to give them a pass, while claiming they'll have to get in line like everyone else to apply for citizenship. WTF?
It's stuff like that which will split the vote. His die hard supporters will overlook this wishy washy spineless stupidity, while the rest of us, wanting for a solid Conservative we can trust not to flip on issues won't support him.
It's crap like this that split us up in 2012. Where we found out late in the campaign.
We need to vet these people right now and decide on a candidate.
Quote from: Solar on April 20, 2015, 07:29:21 AM
Yep. They broke the law, and he wants to give them a pass, while claiming they'll have to get in line like everyone else to apply for citizenship. WTF?
It's stuff like that which will split the vote. His die hard supporters will overlook this wishy washy spineless stupidity, while the rest of us, wanting for a solid Conservative we can trust not to flip on issues won't support him.
It's crap like this that split us up in 2012. Where we found out late in the campaign.
We need to vet these people right now and decide on a candidate.
Amen, bro!
Time is a critical and irreplaceable commodity.
Quote from: kroz on April 20, 2015, 07:42:39 AM
Amen, bro!
Time is a critical and irreplaceable commodity.
Exactly!!!
I know a lot of this comes as a surprise to many of us, but in the game of politics, it really shouldn't be a shock to anyone.
I say this, because we have to question why the Establishment rino haven't made a point of exposing it.
Answer is, they plan to use it when the time is right, which is why I had to search through lib sites to find it.
It's for this reason I despise FOX news, they will always support the Establishment, Murdoch is a huge rino, despite having solid Conservatives like Kelly in the line up.
The "E" has a plan of "Divide and Conquer", they will meticulously go about this by picking off our candidates one by one, leaving only their choice as a final option (think Mitten).
We need to be several steps ahead of their game by cutting off their supply chain so to speak, as well as killing off their candidates early on, which I think we're winning in that aspect of the war, hence the introduction of Grahmnesty.
They're possibly throwing Bush under the bus for another failure, or is that to literal of an interpretation? I don't know, but they're up to something.
Quote from: Solar on April 20, 2015, 08:15:36 AM
Exactly!!!
I know a lot of this comes as a surprise to many of us, but in the game of politics, it really shouldn't be a shock to anyone.
I say this, because we have to question why the Establishment rino haven't made a point of exposing it.
Answer is, they plan to use it when the time is right, which is why I had to search through lib sites to find it.
It's for this reason I despise FOX news, they will always support the Establishment, Murdoch is a huge rino, despite having solid Conservatives like Kelly in the line up.
The "E" has a plan of "Divide and Conquer", they will meticulously go about this by picking off our candidates one by one, leaving only their choice as a final option (think Mitten).
We need to be several steps ahead of their game by cutting off their supply chain so to speak, as well as killing off their candidates early on, which I think we're winning in that aspect of the war, hence the introduction of Grahmnesty.
They're possibly throwing Bush under the bus for another failure, or is that to literal of an interpretation? I don't know, but they're up to something.
I would encourage people to write emails directly to the pundits on Fox News when they undermine our candidate. Believe it or not, it can get a response.
About four years ago I fired off an email to Karl Rove about his comments on Fox News. To my amazement he actually replied to my email. We then exchanged a series of about six emails. I was furious at the way he was portraying Romney as the inevitable nominee
More recently I have emailed Brit Hume, Juan Williams, Greta Van Susteren and the Fox Newsroom. The Newsroom actually replied to me about my comments. It was not a form letter, but a personal exchange of information. They even asked me to continue to provide my perspective on their work.
So, my point is that you should NEVER think your input does not matter! People actually read their mail! Imagine that!
Quote from: kroz on April 20, 2015, 09:00:43 AM
I would encourage people to write emails directly to the pundits on Fox News when they undermine our candidate. Believe it or not, it can get a response.
About four years ago I fired off an email to Karl Rove about his comments on Fox News. To my amazement he actually replied to my email. We then exchanged a series of about six emails. I was furious at the way he was portraying Romney as the inevitable nominee
More recently I have emailed Brit Hume, Juan Williams, Greta Van Susteren and the Fox Newsroom. The Newsroom actually replied to me about my comments. It was not a form letter, but a personal exchange of information. They even asked me to continue to provide my perspective on their work.
So, my point is that you should NEVER think your input does not matter! People actually read their mail! Imagine that!
I forgot to mention that Megyn Kelly is NOT that conservative. She is in favor of gay marriage!
Walker has come out with his own immigration policy. It is good that he is getting around to the big issues.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/)
I think the weak link in this position is that it keeps all illegals and finds them all jobs. Walker says that no new immigrants should be allowed into the Country unless they can do a job that our unemployed will not do..... that includes the current illegals.
Will that play in Peoria?
Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 02:47:20 PM
Walker has come out with his own immigration policy. It is good that he is getting around to the big issues.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/ (http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/04/21/liberals-sputter-as-scott-walker-proposes-bold-new-immigration-platform/)
I think the weak link in this position is that it keeps all illegals and finds them all jobs. Walker says that no new immigrants should be allowed into the Country unless they can do a job that our unemployed will not do..... that includes the current illegals.
Will that play in Peoria?
I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.
Quote from: Solar on April 21, 2015, 05:59:37 PM
I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.
I read the article and it is addressed! Besides regular deportation he is in favor of Self Deportation. That is accomplished by removing the reasons to stay!
An example would be to remove state benefits for illegals and to remove work permits this won't force them all, but it would force quite a few to leave like they did when the economy went south in the construction trades! Between this and regular deportations you could put a real dent in the illegal here already. This is Walkers weakest point but he is working on it! :popcorn: :popcorn:
Quote from: Solar on April 21, 2015, 05:59:37 PM
I couldn't find any mention of what he plans to do with all the illegals already here.
I think this was a bad move on his part, but I get his need to get out ahead of his previous stance.
You are right. He did not mention his intentions toward the illegals. I misread it the first time through.
Must have been reading too fast. :wink:
Quote from: redbeard on April 21, 2015, 06:23:06 PM
I read the article and it is addressed! Besides regular deportation he is in favor of Self Deportation. That is accomplished by removing the reasons to stay!
An example would be to remove state benefits for illegals and to remove work permits this won't force them all, but it would force quite a few to leave like they did when the economy went south in the construction trades! Between this and regular deportations you could put a real dent in the illegal here already. This is Walkers weakest point but he is working on it! :popcorn: :popcorn:
Sounds good and all, and I understand his need to clarify his stance after the mess he created over the years in flipping on the issue.
But he should have simply said, he'd finish the fence and enforce the law.
Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 06:34:27 PM
You are right. He did not mention his intentions toward the illegals. I misread it the first time through.
Must have been reading too fast. :wink:
Did you watch the Video? The article was not all direct quotes. The video was him directly answering some of his intended policies. I want to see more but I don't have issue with what he said!
Quote from: redbeard on April 21, 2015, 07:12:52 PM
Did you watch the Video? The article was not all direct quotes. The video was him directly answering some of his intended policies. I want to see more but I don't have issue with what he said!
Ah-so, I just read the text. I will go back and watch the video. Thanks
Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 07:30:10 PM
Ah-so, I just read the text. I will go back and watch the video. Thanks
Could not get the video to work. That is very strange.
Quote from: kroz on April 21, 2015, 07:33:06 PM
Could not get the video to work. That is very strange.
Some reason I have trouble with that site a lot too! So many video ads use a lot of your computer recourses I guess!
Scott Walker Answer On Immigration (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fylPNhEu7N4#ws)]
Here is a great interview! Answers a lot of questions!
Chris Wallace Grills Scott Walker On Immigration. Walker Admits He's 'Changed' View on Immigration Chris Wallace Grills Scott Walker On Immigration. Walker Admits He's 'Changed' View on Immigration (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uymMeeRV1RU#ws)
Fixed links.
walks
Quote from: kit saginaw on April 18, 2015, 04:04:52 PM
If Walker's running, he'd better announce soon because he's starting to seen as a bit of a flip-flopper. The air is leaving the room...
Ah yeah, we're used to that in Ohio, well at least in Cincy we are. Our wonderful Kasich is doing the very same thing. :thumbdown:
Although, to ban them from stating their opinions, would violate their First amendment rights. Let me tell ya's, the first and fastest way to turn a Free America, into the first trans American Empire, ban free speech. Particularly political free Speech.