Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2012, 11:03:04 AM
By inferring I would even consider Hussein.

Okay, I apologize then. I can understand why you might find it insulting that I inferred that you had totally lost your mind! 

Vote to get Obama out of office. Vote the Republican Party Candidate. Vote because you like Romney. My vote goes to Ron Paul whom I think would make the best President of the candidates being presented. Voting any other way is not being true to my convictions.

Quote from: Possumpoint on May 30, 2012, 11:09:40 AM
Vote to get Obama out of office. Vote the Republican Party Candidate. Vote because you like Romney. My vote goes to Ron Paul whom I think would make the best President of the candidates being presented. Voting any other way is not being true to my convictions.

So you're willing to waste a vote on Ron Paul and risk 4 more years of Obama?

That's the craziest thing I've ever heard. I sure hope you're talking about the primary and not the presidential election.

I mean think about it. To prove that you like Ron Paul, you're willing to give Obama the edge???

I understand you're point, but 4 more years of Obama, and we're likely to be screwed beyond fixing.

Quote from: mdgiles on May 30, 2012, 11:09:16 AM
Okay, I apologize then. I can understand why you might find it insulting that I inferred that you had totally lost your mind! 

OK, you got me on the loss of mind.

Quote from: kramarat on May 30, 2012, 11:23:54 AM
So you're willing to waste a vote on Ron Paul and risk 4 more years of Obama?

That's the craziest thing I've ever heard. I sure hope you're talking about the primary and not the presidential election.

I mean think about it. To prove that you like Ron Paul, you're willing to give Obama the edge???

I understand you're point, but 4 more years of Obama, and we're likely to be screwed beyond fixing.

Pauletts are a small minority and were never even considered part of the equation in the first place.

Quote from: Eccles102 on May 30, 2012, 10:18:26 AM
Point.  Set.  Match.

To amplify my point, Sonya Sotomayor is 57 years old; Elena Kagan is only 52. Barring failed health, these wrong-headed hacks will both likely serve for 25 years or more. THAT is the importance of 2012 -- to keep this from happening twice more.

Can you imagine how long it could take to overcome a 6-3 majority lib/prog Supreme Court?

Quote from: tbone0106 on May 29, 2012, 08:27:26 PM
Did you think Ron Paul was going to stage a last-minute comeback?

Unlikely.  Most of his base isn't of voting age.

Quote from: lessthantolerant on May 30, 2012, 03:46:17 AM
WE all have to remember that we have more to win than just the White House. We need to replace most if not all poilitician in the house and senate with citizen statesmen not career politicians and lawyers.

I fear we are too far gone to fix it though.

Yes!!

Quote from: Solar on May 30, 2012, 12:12:59 PM
Pauletts are a small minority and were never even considered part of the equation in the first place.

It would be pretty scary if everyone that wanted someone other than Romney, felt the same way.

Quote from: kramarat on May 30, 2012, 02:28:49 PM
It would be pretty scary if everyone that wanted someone other than Romney, felt the same way.

If Paul wasn't such a LIBertarian, he could have easily made a difference.
Though it's those lib qualities that appeal to the moderate voter, which is a lot of his base.

Quote from: kramarat on May 30, 2012, 11:23:54 AM
So you're willing to waste a vote on Ron Paul and risk 4 more years of Obama?

That's the craziest thing I've ever heard. I sure hope you're talking about the primary and not the presidential election.

I mean think about it. To prove that you like Ron Paul, you're willing to give Obama the edge???

I understand you're point, but 4 more years of Obama, and we're likely to be screwed beyond fixing.

I will vote for whom I think is the best man/woman. I don't play the game of holding my nose and voting for crap to get sh*t out of office.

Quote from: Possumpoint on May 30, 2012, 03:21:28 PM
I will vote for whom I think is the best man/woman. I don't play the game of holding my nose and voting for crap to get sh*t out of office.

Do what you want. The current sh*t, defies explanation. I'm happy to report that I don't know one democrat that's voting for him. Just stay home.

Even a protest vote for Paul sends a message to both parties, though I doubt he would get enough to make a difference in the general election one way or the other.
If I wasn't so afraid of another Hussein term, I'd vote Paul as a protest vote myself, I really can't take much more Rinoism...
Hey, I coined a new term, Rinoism.

Quote from: kramarat on May 30, 2012, 09:08:42 AM
Let's just say that I'm tired of picking the least crappy choice, as opposed to having someone running that will do what they're supposed to do.

Exactly! America deserves better!

QuoteBased on your take......................Hillary would look good right now.

Even on her best day (and that is long since past) Hillary never looked "good" - politically or otherwise!

-Dr Watt

Quote from: Dr_Watt on May 30, 2012, 05:43:47 PM
Exactly! America deserves better!

Even on her best day (and that is long since past) Hillary never looked "good" - politically or otherwise!

-Dr Watt

Just sayin'.................in hindsight, she looks a lot better than the full bore Marxist/Socialist/Narcissist/Sociopath nut job that's in there now........................and then there's Mr Stumbles, (Biden)......................I won't even get into that mess. He's like the crazy uncle that dumps his f*ckin potatoes on his lap every Thanksgiving.