;D Conservatives are like puppies. We have a short attention span. :)

Quote from: AmericanFlyer on October 23, 2010, 08:10:45 AM
How did the original topic (O'Donnell) get transformed into a debate about homos?  Is O'Donnell a lesbian or something?   :o

Re-reading the thread, crepe05 first mentioned homosexuals in any context.

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/index.php?topic=440.47

That didn't immediately shift things. My refusal to send Candygrams to the deviates may have helped it along a bit.

(Paraphrasing Obama about Hillary Clinton), O'Donnell is not a lesbian as far as I know.

That's foul and catty, but that's what liberals think is a fair comment about a woman politician. They sure as hell let Bubba get away with it.

Quote from: quiller on October 23, 2010, 09:26:21 AM
Re-reading the thread, crepe05 first mentioned homosexuals in any context.

http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/index.php?topic=440.47

That didn't immediately shift things. My refusal to send Candygrams to the deviates may have helped it along a bit.

(Paraphrasing Obama about Hillary Clinton), O'Donnell is not a lesbian as far as I know.

That's foul and catty, but that's what liberals think is a fair comment about a woman politician. They sure as hell let Bubba get away with it.

Yep, just like there is no proof to the roomer that Barney Fwank sucked on Bills Cigar.

Isn't that the shit the leftists pull?

It's easy to establish a fake rumor and pin it on people you can't find later. (Ask our old pal Dan Rather to find the source of that TANG memo for Bush, for example.)

And since John Edwards was the hard-left darling, it was easy to ignore the Rielle Hunter rumors because the hard left who dominate U.S. media wanted that little scumbag to win. But then by some divine comedic touch, it all turned real and Edwards was busted, nearly-inflagrante, all by lowly wretches from a supermarket laughingstock.

Quote from: zip on October 19, 2010, 04:20:16 AM
   Ive been paying special attention to listening to Odonnell...I dont like her one bit...does that mean I wouldnt vote for her over coontz...NO..she would get my vote.
She would have never been my choice to run...shes whacky, she says the same thing over and over...and offers no answers when asked how shes going to do anything she says she wants too....she was absolutely the wrong candidate to put forward....a big teaparty mistake.
    Ok ill let you all go off and tell me how wrong I am.. :)
If someone would have used their heads and did some homework..the teaparty would have supported someone else in the primary and the GOP would OWN that seat in delaware lock stock and barrel....

They all say the same thing over and over. How about Obama and his car analogy. It's part of campaigning. You repeat a certain talking point over and over to drill it into the minds of the voters.

What I don't see you talking about is the issues she's talking about. Is there anything you disagree with or is it a personality issue?