Now this is going to be interesting, it takes a gossip rag to expose it.
So Jerry, ya going to retract your statements?
Meg Whitman: My Maid's Full of It (http://www.tmz.com/2010/09/29/meg-whitman-housekeeper-allegations-gloria-allred-california-governor/)
The documents, which Whitman claims Nicky filled out and signed back in 2000 during her application for employment, appear to show that the maid stated under the penalty of perjury that she was a "lawful permanent resident" of the United States.
Whitman also claims Nicky provided her with a social security card and valid California Driver's License with her employment application ... which Meg kept and has now handed over to TMZ.
Quote from: Pagan on September 29, 2010, 07:58:00 PM
Now this is going to be interesting, it takes a gossip rag to expose it.
So Jerry, ya going to retract your statements?
Meg Whitman: My Maid's Full of It (http://www.tmz.com/2010/09/29/meg-whitman-housekeeper-allegations-gloria-allred-california-governor/)
The documents, which Whitman claims Nicky filled out and signed back in 2000 during her application for employment, appear to show that the maid stated under the penalty of perjury that she was a "lawful permanent resident" of the United States.
Whitman also claims Nicky provided her with a social security card and valid California Driver's License with her employment application ... which Meg kept and has now handed over to TMZ.
I heard this on the news this morning on my drive. The woman was sobbing saying how she had been just tossed out like garbage...
If she lied then Whitman did the right thing. 8)
Hmmm, fired over a year ago, and suddenly this is news?
No one is falling for the lefts tricks anymore.
Pathetic. The left has no real plan for this election...
You got to hand it to Meg for doing a CYA with the documents ;D
Quote from: Pagan on September 29, 2010, 08:26:06 PM
You got to hand it to Meg for doing a CYA with the documents ;D
It was a good move on her part. Unfortunately it is out there...placing doubt. If I had any respect for Jerry Brown I would say I respected him less for such a cheap shot. ???
Quote from: Pagan on September 29, 2010, 08:26:06 PM
You got to hand it to Meg for doing a CYA with the documents ;D
Proves shes smarter then dems they dont cover anything and get busted
Quote from: zip on September 29, 2010, 09:00:26 PM
Proves shes smarter then dems they dont cover anything and get busted
Well let's see where the story goes, so far I've only seen the TMZ site reporting the valid documents.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100929/pl_nm/us_usa_elections_whitman (http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100929/pl_nm/us_usa_elections_whitman)
The Whitman campaign moved quickly to counter the allegations by Nicky Diaz, saying the housekeeper from Mexico lied about her immigration status when she was hired in 2000, providing a Social Security card and other documents that appeared to show she could legally work in the United States.
The Whitman campaign released a U.S. Immigration and Naturalization employment eligibility verification form signed by Diaz when she was hired by Whitman in which she asserts under penalty of perjury that she is a lawful permanent resident.
he campaign also released copies of the Social Security Card and California driver's license supplied by Diaz at the time she was hired, and an employment questionnaire in which she checked a box saying that she could legally accept employment.
This is another dirty trick by the dems as we reach the final weeks prior to the election. Dirty tricks is one thing that the dems do quite well. I expect to see more of them as the next few weeks go by. A lot of the time the dirty tricks work and that encourages the dems to continue doing them. The dems know that they can't win this year on their record.
Here is the documentation:
http://media.nbclosangeles.com/documents/Diaz+Forms.pdf (http://media.nbclosangeles.com/documents/Diaz+Forms.pdf)
Quote from: republicans2 on September 30, 2010, 08:11:06 AM
Here is the documentation:
http://media.nbclosangeles.com/documents/Diaz+Forms.pdf (http://media.nbclosangeles.com/documents/Diaz+Forms.pdf)
Armstrong and Getty made a ring tone out of the "You don't know me and I don't know you" comment made by the maid. Too funny. It would be great for numbers you don't recognize.
I guess the main thoughts I had were: If she is an illegal - why is she still in the country? Why is her English still this bad if she has been here 10 years? And since she only worked for Whitman 15 hours a week who else was she working for? ???
Quote from: Solars Toy on September 30, 2010, 09:42:35 PM
Armstrong and Getty made a ring tone out of the "You don't know me and I don't know you" comment made by the maid. Too funny. It would be great for numbers you don't recognize.
I guess the main thoughts I had were: If she is an illegal - why is she still in the country? Why is her English still this bad if she has been here 10 years? And since she only worked for Whitman 15 hours a week who else was she working for? ???
At $24.00 an hour no less.
At that rate, Whitman obviously wasn't hiring an illegal, illegals will work for a third of that.
Mark Levin had Allred on his show. Old Gloria is taking advantage of this woman for political purposes:
http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364 (http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364)
Quote from: republicans2 on September 30, 2010, 10:03:36 PM
Mark Levin had Allred on his show. Old Gloria is taking advantage of this woman for political purposes:
http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364 (http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364)
Yes she is but I am sure she has also made sure this woman will be well compensated for doing this. Half of what she said sounded like the well coached phrases of Allred. ::)
Quote from: republicans2 on September 30, 2010, 10:03:36 PM
Mark Levin had Allred on his show. Old Gloria is taking advantage of this woman for political purposes:
http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364 (http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364)
Wow. That was pathetic...
Quote from: republicans2 on September 30, 2010, 10:03:36 PM
Mark Levin had Allred on his show. Old Gloria is taking advantage of this woman for political purposes:
http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364 (http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1970739&spid=32364)
Sorry R2, I never saw your post, before I posted a thread on this.
Levin made her look like the hypocritical lib that she is.
What is funny about this is Whitman did absolutely nothing wrong, and I have no idea what Allred is doing or trying to represent.
Quote from: taxed on October 01, 2010, 11:25:38 AM
What is funny about this is Whitman did absolutely nothing wrong, and I have no idea what Allred is doing or trying to represent.
That's just it, she did absolutely nothing wrong.
It's akin to hiring a landscaping company, and they employ illegals.
The guy that owns the business is solely responsible, not the person that hired the company.
Meg did the same, she employed a company that sent her an applicant that they had cleared.
If I buy a gun from a reputable dealer, that turns out to be hot, I am the victim, as is meg.
Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2010, 11:34:57 AM
That's just it, she did absolutely nothing wrong.
It's akin to hiring a landscaping company, and they employ illegals.
The guy that owns the business is solely responsible, not the person that hired the company.
Meg did the same, she employed a company that sent her an applicant that they had cleared.
If I buy a gun from a reputable dealer, that turns out to be hot, I am the victim, as is meg.
It really is a no win situation. Unfortunately from what I have understood, even if you (your company) didn't know they were undocumented and you let them go when you found out you can still be fined. So it seems the only way around this and your best bet to avoid it is to never hire anyone Hispanic. :P :P
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 08:25:31 PM
It really is a no win situation. Unfortunately from what I have understood, even if you (your company) didn't know they were undocumented and you let them go when you found out you can still be fined. So it seems the only way around this and your best bet to avoid it is to never hire anyone Hispanic. :P :P
;D ;D ;D ;D
Good point.
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 08:25:31 PM
It really is a no win situation. Unfortunately from what I have understood, even if you (your company) didn't know they were undocumented and you let them go when you found out you can still be fined. So it seems the only way around this and your best bet to avoid it is to never hire anyone Hispanic. :P :P
You mean if the company didn't check in the first place?
Quote from: taxed on October 01, 2010, 11:25:38 AM
What is funny about this is Whitman did absolutely nothing wrong, and I have no idea what Allred is doing or trying to represent.
Shes just trying to smear her doesnt matter if its true if it turns a few voters away..allred is a sceive I cant stand her
Quote from: zip on October 01, 2010, 08:30:36 PM
Shes just trying to smear her doesnt matter if its true if it turns a few voters away..allred is a sceive I cant stand her
She is a total loser. It amazes me how some people don't care that they look like idiots.
Quote from: taxed on October 01, 2010, 08:29:45 PM
You mean if the company didn't check in the first place?
I was listening to my favorite news talk this morning and one of the callers said they worked for a construction company. If they accepted the documents they provided and it later came back that they weren't - even if they let them go they were fined... At least that's how I understood it... This appears to be a ST research project... :-\ :-\
ST
If this situation existed in a state where common sense and decency prevailed this would not be an issue. Once again the left can't win on issues so they attack or smear. It's back to square one for California and the liberals prove the last thing they want is change.
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 08:33:18 PM
I was listening to my favorite news talk this morning and one of the callers said they worked for a construction company. If they accepted the documents they provided and it later came back that they weren't - even if they let them go they were fined... At least that's how I understood it... This appears to be a ST research project... :-\ :-\
ST
Let me know if you hear more about that, because I wonder if that is a state thing.
Quote from: republicans2 on October 01, 2010, 08:34:29 PM
If this situation existed in a state where common sense and decency prevailed this would not be an issue. Once again the left can't win on issues so they attack or smear. It's back to square one for California and the liberals prove the last thing they want is change.
They are going to get change in CA, once the State goes bankrupt in a couple of years.
So I checked a couple of sites...
With today's complex immigration and labor laws, an employer with foreign workers must be careful to avoid violating immigration and anti-discrimination laws at all stages of the employer/employee relationship. Issues regarding immigration and anti-discrimination laws can occur during the hiring period, the employment phase, and at termination. For example, if a worker presents a temporary work authorization document from the Immigration Service at the time the worker is hired, the employer must not only make a good faith effort to verify the legitimacy of the document, but also re-verify the employee's work authorization at the time the initial authorization expires.
The employer could also be fined $100 to $1,000 for each individual "paperwork" violation.
So even if you make the good faith effort and the paperwork comes back hinky you can still be fined....
http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/penaltiesforemployingundocumentedworkers/ (http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/penaltiesforemployingundocumentedworkers/)
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 08:40:26 PM
So I checked a couple of sites...
With today's complex immigration and labor laws, an employer with foreign workers must be careful to avoid violating immigration and anti-discrimination laws at all stages of the employer/employee relationship. Issues regarding immigration and anti-discrimination laws can occur during the hiring period, the employment phase, and at termination. For example, if a worker presents a temporary work authorization document from the Immigration Service at the time the worker is hired, the employer must not only make a good faith effort to verify the legitimacy of the document, but also re-verify the employee's work authorization at the time the initial authorization expires.
The employer could also be fined $100 to $1,000 for each individual "paperwork" violation.
So even if you make the good faith effort and the paperwork comes back hinky you can still be fined....
http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/penaltiesforemployingundocumentedworkers/ (http://www.nvo.com/beaulier/penaltiesforemployingundocumentedworkers/)
hinky lol you don't hear that word much ST but I do like it. 8)
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
So Whitman claims to know nothing about her maid being an illegal alien,
all but accuses her maid of stealing a letter from Social Security re: her immigration status
so that Whitman and her husband wouldn't know that she was an illegal,
and then when the letter turns up with her husband's handwritten note acknowledging
receipt of the letter, she tap dances around the issue as if she has no responsibility
for hiring an illegal alien and then lying about not knowing about it? She's going down in flames.
Welcome back, Governor Brown!
Link?
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
So Whitman claims to know nothing about her maid being an illegal alien,
all but accuses her maid of stealing a letter from Social Security re: her immigration status
so that Whitman and her husband wouldn't know that she was an illegal,
and then when the letter turns up with her husband's handwritten note acknowledging
receipt of the letter, she tap dances around the issue as if she has no responsibility
for hiring an illegal alien and then lying about not knowing about it? She's going down in flames.
Welcome back, Governor Brown!
Beau, you really do have it all wrong, seriously.
If you can keep an open mind, put yourself in Meg's place, her nanny gets a letter from immigration and the husband sees it and puts a note on the bottom for the nanny to check up on it, that was the last they ever heard about it.
Now keep in mind, the nanny lied to the employment agency, lied to the Whitmans, and showed false identification.
As an employer, with a friend of the family employed, that they trust with the care of their children, do you really think they knew she was an illegal?
Keep in mind, they trusted this woman implicitly.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
So Whitman claims to know nothing about her maid being an illegal alien,
all but accuses her maid of stealing a letter from Social Security re: her immigration status
so that Whitman and her husband wouldn't know that she was an illegal,
and then when the letter turns up with her husband's handwritten note acknowledging
receipt of the letter, she tap dances around the issue as if she has no responsibility
for hiring an illegal alien and then lying about not knowing about it? She's going down in flames.
Welcome back, Governor Brown!
I am still trying to understand what she did wrong? She went through an agency so wasn't it their responsibility to verify? You are making her, Whitman, damned if she does and damned if she don't... If you hire a Mexican gardener and he hires undocumented workers are you responsible? :-\ :-\ :-\
Personally I will do my best to keep Brown out.
Alred was on Greta Van Susteran's show tonight. Greta a fellow lawyer destroyed Alred's argument, simply by reading the document Alred claims is a smoking gun. Alred is not stupid. She's a good lawyer she simply cannot defend nor explain her client's position because there is no defense. That is because there is no case. This whole thing is a political calculation. I think Alred knows she screwed up but is in too deep...
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on October 01, 2010, 08:55:56 PM
Alred was on Greta Van Susteran's show tonight. Greta a fellow lawyer destroyed Alred's argument, simply by reading the document Alred claims is a smoking gun. Alred is not stupid. She's a good lawyer she simply cannot defend nor explain her client's position because there is no defense. That is because there is no case. This whole thing is a political calculation. I think Alred knows she screwed up but is in too deep...
GRETA VAN SUSTEREN DESTROYS GLORIA ALLRED (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utL6L_ByCgs#)
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on October 01, 2010, 08:55:56 PM
Alred was on Greta Van Susteran's show tonight. Greta a fellow lawyer destroyed Alred's argument, simply by reading the document Alred claims is a smoking gun. Alred is not stupid. She's a good lawyer she simply cannot defend nor explain her client's position because there is no defense. That is because there is no case. This whole thing is a political calculation. I think Alred knows she screwed up but is in too deep...
I agree, she has lost every argument when the interviewer actually knows something about the law.
You're right, she is looking for the exit about now.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
So Whitman claims to know nothing about her maid being an illegal alien,
all but accuses her maid of stealing a letter from Social Security re: her immigration status
so that Whitman and her husband wouldn't know that she was an illegal,
and then when the letter turns up with her husband's handwritten note acknowledging
receipt of the letter, she tap dances around the issue as if she has no responsibility
for hiring an illegal alien and then lying about not knowing about it? She's going down in flames.
Welcome back, Governor Brown!
Where did she accuse her maid of stealing the letter?
The full video...
http://video.foxnews.com/#/v/4357012/whitman-scandal-smoking-gun-or-dirty-politics/?playlist_id=87937 (http://video.foxnews.com/#/v/4357012/whitman-scandal-smoking-gun-or-dirty-politics/?playlist_id=87937)
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:01:55 PM
Still, a couple days ago Whitman was denying any knowledge of her maid's status
as well as denying knowledge of the letter that her husband read and wrote a note on.
She fairly accused her maid of stealing or concealing the letter which she had to know about.
Either she is lying, or her husband knew about it and didn't tell her even after this became an issue.
No matter what you choose to believe, it doesn't bode well for a billionaire trying to become the
next governor on the premise that she is an all together organizational business maveness.
If she ever had a chance, I don't believe that she has one now. Get used to Brown 2010.
I can barely remember what I did two weeks ago let alone 7 years ago... :) :) :)
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:01:55 PM
Still, a couple days ago Whitman was denying any knowledge of her maid's status
as well as denying knowledge of the letter that her husband read and wrote a note on.
She fairly accused her maid of stealing or concealing the letter which she had to know about.
Either she is lying, or her husband knew about it and didn't tell her even after this became an issue.
No matter what you choose to believe, it doesn't bode well for a billionaire trying to become the
next governor on the premise that she is an all together organizational business maveness.
If she ever had a chance, I don't believe that she has one now. Get used to Brown 2010.
Did it ever occur to you that maybe he didn't think it was that big of a deal?
After all, it was addressed to her, so he made sure she saw it and figured she would deal with it.
If it was me, I would think they get letters like that all the time, considering immigration issues and how screwed up our system is.
A lot of people don't realize how common names don't match up with their SSN. My name didn't match, for instance. it is pretty common, and doesn't mean the person is not legal.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:14:04 PM
You'd remember if your maid's immigration status was being investigated by Social Security or not.
Or if you received a letter questioning that status, or if you read it and wrote on it, or if you ever
took the time to follow up on it to make sure that she was indeed a legally registered alien.
You'd especially remember it if you were running for Governor and it had come up as an issue
that you had chosen to ignore or deflect or obfuscate or lie about. At least you should be able
to remember it if you are claiming to be qualified to be the Governor of the most populous state in
the Union. And if you can't remember, or worse yet if you did remember and then lied about it,
then you shouldn't be surprised if you are not elected Governor of that very same state.
It didn't question her status.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:14:04 PM
You'd remember if your maid's immigration status was being investigated by Social Security or not.
Or if you received a letter questioning that status, or if you read it and wrote on it, or if you ever
took the time to follow up on it to make sure that she was indeed a legally registered alien.
You'd especially remember it if you were running for Governor and it had come up as an issue
that you had chosen to ignore or deflect or obfuscate or lie about. At least you should be able
to remember it if you are claiming to be qualified to be the Governor of the most populous state in
the Union. And if you can't remember, or worse yet if you did remember and then lied about it,
then you shouldn't be surprised if you are not elected Governor of that very same state.
But it was merely a form letter inquiry, it was not an investigation.
The guy in charge of immigration said that it was the first letter sent out when they have questions, he said they do a follow up letter to the employer, a letter they never got.
They paid the woman $24.00 an hour, how many illegals get that kind of money?
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:14:04 PM
You'd remember if your maid's immigration status was being investigated by Social Security or not.
Or if you received a letter questioning that status, or if you read it and wrote on it, or if you ever
took the time to follow up on it to make sure that she was indeed a legally registered alien.
You'd especially remember it if you were running for Governor and it had come up as an issue
that you had chosen to ignore or deflect or obfuscate or lie about. At least you should be able
to remember it if you are claiming to be qualified to be the Governor of the most populous state in
the Union. And if you can't remember, or worse yet if you did remember and then lied about it,
then you shouldn't be surprised if you are not elected Governor of that very same state.
So you get one letter you give it to her and never hear anything back from the government. Why only one letter - this is the government after all. If there was no follow up letter then you figure it was taken care and there was nothing to worry about. That is of course until the offending party comes back to finally confess to you they are undocumented when they realize you are running for office and this could maybe be a problem.
And yes Bama Beau - as a female I can tell you selective memory comes in very handy. ;) ;)
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 09:21:42 PM
So you get one letter you give it to her and never hear anything back from the government. Why only one letter - this is the government after all. If there was no follow up letter then you figure it was taken care and there was nothing to worry about. That is of course until the offending party comes back to finally confess to you they are undocumented when they realize you are running for office and this could maybe be a problem.
And yes Bama Beau - as a female I can tell you selective memory comes in very handy. ;) ;)
That's it exactly, you would figure she handled it, seeing how immigration services never came out in person.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:30:36 PM
Of course it did. It was an inquiry regarding a possibly phony or incorrect SS#
being used by a resident alien to obtain employment. And Whitman and her husband
knew about it even though they claimed that they didn't right up until the letter
was produced with his handwritten note on the letter. You'd think that the
"tough on immigration" candidate would be aware of or recollect such a letter,
especially after denying that she was aware of it right up until the time that it
was produced by the maid's attorney (whom I dislike) for all to see.
None of this has been proven..
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:30:36 PM
Of course it did. It was an inquiry regarding a possibly phony or incorrect SS#
being used by a resident alien to obtain employment. And Whitman and her husband
knew about it even though they claimed that they didn't right up until the letter
was produced with his handwritten note on the letter. You'd think that the
"tough on immigration" candidate would be aware of or recollect such a letter,
especially after denying that she was aware of it right up until the time that it
was produced by the maid's attorney (whom I dislike) for all to see.
Hey at least we agree that Allred is a cunt. :) :)
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:30:36 PM
Of course it did.
No it didn't.
Quote
It was an inquiry regarding a possibly phony or incorrect SS#
being used by a resident alien to obtain employment.
Nope.
Quote
And Whitman and her husband
knew about it even though they claimed that they didn't right up until the letter
was produced with his handwritten note on the letter.
Wrong.
Quote
You'd think that the
"tough on immigration" candidate would be aware of or recollect such a letter,
especially after denying that she was aware of it right up until the time that it
was produced by the maid's attorney (whom I dislike) for all to see.
No. You make the letter sound like a big deal.
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 09:30:36 PM
Of course it did. It was an inquiry regarding a possibly phony or incorrect SS#
being used by a resident alien to obtain employment. And Whitman and her husband
knew about it even though they claimed that they didn't right up until the letter
was produced with his handwritten note on the letter. You'd think that the
"tough on immigration" candidate would be aware of or recollect such a letter,
especially after denying that she was aware of it right up until the time that it
was produced by the maid's attorney (whom I dislike) for all to see.
Maybe they thought someone was using her SS number.
You forget, they were paying this lady high wages, even for Southern Ca, and they trusted the woman implicitly.
If you were looking to hire an illegal, wouldn't you pay as little as possible?
Wasn't this maid found through a legitimate employment service?
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on October 01, 2010, 10:00:06 PM
Wasn't this maid found through a legitimate employment service?
Yep, but were supposed to think she specifically wanted an illegal, so she could pay her an above average wage.
Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2010, 10:04:06 PM
Yep, but were supposed to think she specifically wanted an illegal, so she could pay her an above average wage.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
www.hireillegalsforbucketsofmoney.com (http://www.hireillegalsforbucketsofmoney.com)
Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2010, 10:04:06 PM
Yep, but were supposed to think she specifically wanted an illegal, so she could pay her an above average wage.
That explains that 30 page application she filled out...
Quote from: Cryptic Bert on October 01, 2010, 10:06:36 PM
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
www.hireillegalsforbucketsofmoney.com (http://www.hireillegalsforbucketsofmoney.com)
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
And to think, I actually clicked on it. ;D
Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2010, 10:13:22 PM
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
And to think, I actually clicked on it. ;D
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Quote from: taxed on October 01, 2010, 10:07:28 PM
That explains that 30 page application she filled out...
Good illegals are hard to find, especially ones you can trust to help raise your children.
Quote from: Solar on October 01, 2010, 10:15:03 PM
Good illegals are hard to find, especially ones you can trust to help raise your children.
They are so expensive...
Quote from: bama_beau_redux on October 01, 2010, 08:45:01 PM
So Whitman claims to know nothing about her maid being an illegal alien,
all but accuses her maid of stealing a letter from Social Security re: her immigration status
so that Whitman and her husband wouldn't know that she was an illegal,
and then when the letter turns up with her husband's handwritten note acknowledging
receipt of the letter, she tap dances around the issue as if she has no responsibility
for hiring an illegal alien and then lying about not knowing about it? She's going down in flames.
Welcome back, Governor Brown!
You are aware that the handwritten note from the husband said something like, "Take care of this". From what I understand, the Whitman's thought it was a mistake, which you do know occasionally happens when working with fed employees, don't you? The Whitman's never did get a follow up letter, did they? If I had been them, I would have assumed that the maid had taken care of it.
If the maid's an illegal, why is she still in the country now that it's all been discovered? II'll admit I haven't read all of the respnses yet, and maybe that's already been mentioned..
Quote from: Solars Toy on October 01, 2010, 09:06:11 PM
I can barely remember what I did two weeks ago let alone 7 years ago... :) :) :)
You can remember two weeks ago? mr crepe and I have a saying that if we've had a night's sleep, there's a good chance we don't remember. ;D
Quote from: crepe05 on October 02, 2010, 03:22:29 AM
You can remember two weeks ago? mr crepe and I have a saying that if we've had a night's sleep, there's a good chance we don't remember. ;D
Sometimes.... :o :o :o
Quote from: crepe05 on October 02, 2010, 03:22:29 AM
You can remember two weeks ago? mr crepe and I have a saying that if we've had a night's sleep, there's a good chance we don't remember. ;D
Called old age memory loss. lol Sometimes it thats me 2 week to remember what the good wife ask me to do. ST that where the H/D/List comes in play. lol
Quote from: crepe05 on October 02, 2010, 03:22:29 AM
You can remember two weeks ago? mr crepe and I have a saying that if we've had a night's sleep, there's a good chance we don't remember. ;D
I can remember all and everything all the way back to my birth, every event, like yesterday, I had a an omelet, for breakfast, and a glass of orange juice, when I sat down the glass a fly landed on the table, I used the paper to swat at it, the paper had a picture of a flower on it, the ink rubbed off on my hands, I wiped my hands on my shirt, and had to wash it, the laundry soap made me sneeze, I hate sneezing, it always makes my throat hurt.
Remember that movie, deep throat?
By the way, what in the Hell was I talking about? ::) ;D
Oh yeah, senility...