Quote from: taxed on January 27, 2023, 08:38:23 AMYou never batted an eye when I said you didn't watch the video... you doubled and tripled down and continued to lie and assume "poaching" was in reference to Crowder.

At any point in the conversation you would think he would have gone back to check the post RIGHT BEFORE HIS OWN that had the relevant information.

But no, he just drove forward into idiocy without a second thought.

Quote from: ZenMode on January 27, 2023, 05:35:29 PMYou use those examples after the  You use the example of Walsh after the fact to try and cover your lying ass. All content means all content. You don't get to manipulate the meaning of words to try and cover for your dishonesty.

And where did you mention Candace Owens?

              

You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT(before and after joining DW)" and not "ALL CONTENT(made while with DW)". But instead of asking for clarification you just made a knee jerk assumption and ran with it thinking you could get even for your earlier embarrassment.

You know what they say about making ass-u-mptions....

Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 10:54:00 AMYou're equally irresponsible. I wasn't caught doing anything, other than responding before reading every post and watching every video. That's not lying. If I said "I watched the TMI (or whatever it was called) video, that would very likely be kying. Of course, honest people can acknowledge that. Dishonest people can't and won't.

Ok I guess we can let you slide with the dumbest dunce award instead of the lying award if thats what you really want...

I mean seriously, it was the post right above your own and at no point in the conversation did you ever go back and even look. You would still be in the dark about it if I hadn't pointed it out to you.

Quote from: T Hunt on January 28, 2023, 11:36:09 AM             

You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT(before and after joining DW)" and not "ALL CONTENT(made while with DW)". But instead of asking for clarification you just made a knee jerk assumption and ran with it thinking you could get even for your earlier embarrassment.

You know what they say about making ass-u-mptions....

"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....

This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!

Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT"  actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!

Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 12:33:45 PM"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....

This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!

Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT"  actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!

You have obviously not dealt with contracts and lawyers. Yes, when discussing contracts, words can have different meaning from everyday speaking. Get over it.

Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 06:25:32 AMde·lu·sion·al

adjective

characterized by or holding false beliefs or judgments about external reality that are held despite incontrovertible evidence to the contrary, typically as a symptom of a mental condition.

What to know what our definition of village idiot is?

Quote from: ZenMode on January 28, 2023, 12:33:45 PM"You just made an ASSUMPTION, assuming that "ALL CONTENT" meant "ALL CONTENT"....

This is some of the funniest, and most ironic, things I've ever read!!

Yah, what kind of moron would assume that the words "ALL CONTENT"  actually meant ALL CONTENT... Like you just did!?!

        

Im glad you can be good natured enough to laugh at yourself. Too many they send here would get embarrassed and run away after that large of a mistake. At least you havent completely fallen off the boat.

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on January 21, 2023, 10:07:01 PMIf that is true, and he get's $42 million a year in subscriptions, why would you even consider working for someone else and demanding/only wanting $30 million a year? It doesn't sound right. It also doesn't add up on the time frame of leaving "The Blaze", asking for the job, creating that website, and putting out the fake outrage.

I call bullshit.

In the infamous 3rd video, he said it's standard to not know how many subscribers you have, so there's no reason to believe he knows. The DW guy said the same

^^^I responded to the wrong post^^^