I never thought she was really running. Looks like she is. Nothing but condemnation for her boss. They all move to the right when they're campaigning -- even Communists.
She seems to now see the threat of "one of the world's 'GREAT' religions" :lol:
I still say she's just too nasty and unlikable to win much support. Elizabeth Warren seems to appeal to the uneducated, America Hating masses that elected the current Communist
QuoteIn an interview with the Atlantic published on Sunday, the former secretary of state says the "failure" of the United States to help those protesting the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad led to the rise of al-Qaida-inspired groups like ISIL, the militants currently creating havoc in Syria and Iraq.
"The failure to help build up a credible fighting force of the people who were the originators of the protests against Assad — there were Islamists, there were secularists, there was everything in the middle — that failure left a big vacuum, which the jihadists have now filled," Clinton said.
The former first lady and U.S. senator said she fears the jihadist groups currently gaining strength in the Middle East will expand their sights to Europe and the U.S.
"One of the reasons why I worry about what's happening in the Middle East right now is because of the breakout capacity of jihadist groups that can affect Europe, can affect the United States," she continued. "Jihadist groups are governing territory. They will never stay there, though. They are driven to expand. Their raison d'etre is to be against the West, against the Crusaders, against the fill-in-the-blank — and we all fit into one of these categories. How do we try to contain that? I'm thinking a lot about containment, deterrence and defeat."
http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html (http://news.yahoo.com/hillary-clinton-obama-foreign-policy-isis-gaza-failure-141410915.html)
She was the face of his foreign policy. If she disagreed with it why didn't she resign?
She's responsible for Obama's 'failed foreign policy', but the masses are too ignorant to figure that out.
If we let her, why wouldn't she lie like hell and win ? We know that somewhere between 30 & 55% are illiterate, immoral, and radical enough to believe whatever she says and vote for her.
If we (GOP / TP)do the work, it stays down at 30....if we don't, it may get up to 55. She'll even get votes from conservative women, the devout, other seemingly rational people.....just for the FWP scam and her well-worn 'stand by your man' / 'devoted first lady & mother' playbook.
Satire Alert...
Despite serving four years as Obama's Secretary of State and traveling almost a million miles, Hillary has decided to admit, "Whenever I saw him, I hid. I hated to see him. That's why I traveled so much. I had to get away from him."
Quote from: AndyJackson on August 11, 2014, 05:46:34 AM
If we let her, why wouldn't she lie like hell and win ? We know that somewhere between 30 & 55% are illiterate, immoral, and radical enough to believe whatever she says and vote for her.
If we (GOP / TP)do the work, it stays down at 30....if we don't, it may get up to 55. She'll even get votes from conservative women, the devout, other seemingly rational people.....just for the FWP scam and her well-worn 'stand by your man' / 'devoted first lady & mother' playbook.
Conservative women stand by their man when they cheat and prey on girls? If I did that my christian wife would divorce me for sure and leave me bloodied in a corner in the process :laugh:
Quote from: carlb on August 10, 2014, 07:35:01 PM
I never thought she was really running. Looks like she is. Nothing but condemnation for her boss. They all move to the right when they're campaigning -- even Communists.
She seems to now see the threat of "one of the world's 'GREAT' religions" :lol:
I still say she's just too nasty and unlikable to win much support. Elizabeth Warren seems to appeal to the uneducated, America Hating masses that elected the current Communist
Yeah right! I take it that she's gonna' fess up huh? We all want to know about the Benghazi event. :rolleyes: Talk about some that may need to grow a "set"?
Ole' Hitlery has enough for her and a few more. She needs to sit her big arse at the house and consider all she's done-truthfully,if possible-to destroy America.
Warren has even less chance in the conservative world. It's no wonder the dems would want to trot her out there to run, they've about played their last hand in this crap shoot.
I still think it is too soon to cast opinions about who the next president should be.
We have a much more serious event coming in Nov. and trying to clean house in the congress.
Quote from: The Boo Man... on August 10, 2014, 07:57:56 PM
She was the face of his foreign policy. If she disagreed with it why didn't she resign?
I thought the same thing, Pot meet the kettle, kettle meet the pot. :)
Quote from: daidalos on August 11, 2014, 09:34:00 PM
I thought the same thing, Pot meet the kettle, kettle meet the pot. :)
Actually it's pot meet cankle, cankle meet mumu...
Quote from: tac on August 11, 2014, 04:26:53 AM
She's responsible for Obama's 'failed foreign policy', but the masses are too ignorant to figure that out.
Yup.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.fotki.com%2F1_p%2Crswqbwfdsdktdftxbqfqsbrwqdbw%2Cvi%2Fsqbddwtwtxkfkkgwgs%2F1%2F1595431%2F12751927%2Flary_2016enlightened_statesmen-vi.png&hash=0aa856656f15aa88562f1461c95891a75d4c01e9)
There is certainly a lot of speculation going on that she is going to run and she certainly is trying to distance herself from Obama although they both are experts at avoiding responsibility...at this point "what difference does it make"...right?
It will be interesting. Clinton will try to run on her record and I think all of her baggage will catch up to her. Warren will be running on her lack of record so to speak and I hope people aren't stupid enough to vote for someone with those credentials again; we all know too painfully how that turned out.
Quote from: suzziY on August 12, 2014, 05:05:39 AM
There is certainly a lot of speculation going on that she is going to run and she certainly is trying to distance herself from Obama although they both are experts at avoiding responsibility...at this point "what difference does it make"...right?
It will be interesting. Clinton will try to run on her record and I think all of her baggage will catch up to her. Warren will be running on her lack of record so to speak and I hope people aren't stupid enough to vote for someone with those credentials again; we all know too painfully how that turned out.
Ask yourself one simple question.
Did the party keep the rock star image alive?
Considering all the lies and broken promises by an entire party that put a Marxist in the WH.
How do you suppose they will regain the trust of their base, let alone generate the tiniest amount excitement behind anyone in the Dim party?
Seriously, give that some consideration, then look at the base on the Right, when was the last time you've seen anything remotely close to this kind of motivation?
Now tell me, after a bloody slaughter in Nov, who will win 2016?
Quote from: suzziY on August 12, 2014, 05:05:39 AM
I think all of her baggage will catch up to her.
Her exciting new
Goose Chase-line of carpetbags will be released next Fall...
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com%2F131d4b66886f11e38be512bcfd5e32a4_6.jpg&hash=00c991867aeb9d3aea3502a7f76f472901136687)
Shillery is trying to distance herself from Obama, but it won't work. Too many of his most embarrassing Foreign Policy failures happen on her watch as Sec of State. Benghazi, anyone!
Quote from: kit saginaw on August 12, 2014, 05:41:36 AM
Her exciting new Goose Chase-line of carpetbags will be released next Fall...
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com%2F131d4b66886f11e38be512bcfd5e32a4_6.jpg&hash=00c991867aeb9d3aea3502a7f76f472901136687)
Any bets how fast this thread derails by me asking how you
EVER stumbled onto that image? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Mountainshield on August 11, 2014, 08:34:47 AM
Conservative women stand by their man when they cheat and prey on girls? If I did that my christian wife would divorce me for sure and leave me bloodied in a corner in the process :laugh:
lol, some will vote for her because that was their favorite song at some point, not because of the truth about the Clintons.
Quote from: kit saginaw on August 12, 2014, 05:41:36 AM
Her exciting new Goose Chase-line of carpetbags will be released next Fall...
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fdistilleryimage0.s3.amazonaws.com%2F131d4b66886f11e38be512bcfd5e32a4_6.jpg&hash=00c991867aeb9d3aea3502a7f76f472901136687)
Put a picture of Ambassador Stevens on that thing....that's what's needed. And one with the dead border agents, and one with the other Benghazi victims.
Time to be as dirty as the dems. But will we / they ?
Quote from: mdgiles on August 12, 2014, 06:01:54 AM
Shillery is trying to distance herself from Obama, but it won't work. Too many of his most embarrassing Foreign Policy failures happen on her watch as Sec of State. Benghazi, anyone!
She has to careful. If she goes too far on Obama the far left will do what they did in 2008 - abandon her. Then Warren becomes the darling of the left. She is the one that concerns me as MSM will shine her and coverup her leftist ways.
Rush's theory today (and he's usually right!) is that Hillary is now dissing Obama and the media are helping her out.
Be on the watch for it. Obama won't run again, and they want another Democrat (obviously), so they will help her by here and there throwing their creation, Obama, under the bus.
He takes this as a clear sign she is gearing up to run.
DaisyJane :huh:
Quote from: DaisyJane on August 12, 2014, 01:57:09 PM
Rush's theory today (and he's usually right!) is that Hillary is now dissing Obama and the media are helping her out.
Be on the watch for it. Obama won't run again, and they want another Democrat (obviously), so they will help her by here and there throwing their creation, Obama, under the bus.
He takes this as a clear sign she is gearing up to run.
DaisyJane :huh:
Rush is Right and here's why.
The party is literally imploding in on itself because of Hussein's Marxist policies. Warren was his pick to carry on the destruction, something the constituents want no part of, in turn a guaranteed loss for 2016.
Hitlery on the other hand sees this as an opportunity to set herself apart from the leftist plunge, claiming she's the "New Face of the Dim Party".
And yes, the LSM is in her corner and will happily back her. Though they will do this slowly over the next 18 months so as to not saturate the airwaves with Hitlery and cause Hitlery fatigue.
They'll pretend to make it look close until the end when they put their full support behind the little commie bitch.
But regardless, this is still not going to bring back the excitement that was generated for Hussein, simply because Hitlery just isn't likable, aside the fact that an entire generation was lied to by the party, a wound that will not heal.
Quote from: quiller on August 12, 2014, 07:00:52 AM
Any bets how fast this thread derails by me asking how you EVER stumbled onto that image? :lol: :lol: :lol:
The thread's continuing quite flowingly... Reading Suzzy's
baggage comment, I thought of former Washington Post political-cartoonist, Herbert Block's caustic 'carpetbag' swipes at RFK, so I googled
Herblock, carpetbag and that image was one of the first ones presented.
There is no way they will stir up the excitement they were able to for Obama. He was their creation after all. They never even investigated him like other candidates.
Hillary has been in the public eye since 1992. She is way too well known already. She has been investigated. Her personality puts off some people.
She will need a different kind of help.
DaisyJane :blink:
Quote from: Solar on August 12, 2014, 02:20:11 PM
Rush is Right and here's why.
The party is literally imploding in on itself because of Hussein's Marxist policies. Warren was his pick to carry on the destruction, something the constituents want no part of, in turn a guaranteed loss for 2016.
Hitlery on the other hand sees this as an opportunity to set herself apart from the leftist plunge, claiming she's the "New Face of the Dim Party".
And yes, the LSM is in her corner and will happily back her. Though they will do this slowly over the next 18 months so as to not saturate the airwaves with Hitlery and cause Hitlery fatigue.
They'll pretend to make it look close until the end when they put their full support behind the little commie bitch.
But regardless, this is still not going to bring back the excitement that was generated for Hussein, simply because Hitlery just isn't likable, aside the fact that an entire generation was lied to by the party, a wound that will not heal.
"Hitlery on the other hand sees this as an opportunity to set herself apart from the leftist plunge, claiming she's the "New Face of the Dim Party"."
To me it is a repeat of what Bubba did to win in 1992. The democrat party had run off the rails and gone full scale leftist with Dukakis and Mondale. Clinton came to the rescue with the DNC or whatever it was called. It worked. Moving back to center is their MO until they get elected. The past is the best indicator of the future, but most of America does not see that.
Quote from: supsalemgr on August 12, 2014, 06:11:05 PM
"Hitlery on the other hand sees this as an opportunity to set herself apart from the leftist plunge, claiming she's the "New Face of the Dim Party"."
To me it is a repeat of what Bubba did to win in 1992. The democrat party had run off the rails and gone full scale leftist with Dukakis and Mondale. Clinton came to the rescue with the DNC or whatever it was called. It worked. Moving back to center is their MO until they get elected. The past is the best indicator of the future, but most of America does not see that.
Exactly right! She will run to the right as the moderate, the one who claims to unite the people, when we all know the truth, they'll just enforce all of the Marxists policies.
You're right though, the past is a predictor of the future.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Clinton Apologizes to Obama for Foreign Policy Firestorm
"Earlier today, the Secretary called President Obama to make sure he knows that nothing she said was an attempt to attack him, his policies, or his leadership. Secretary Clinton has at every step of the way touted the significant achievements of his Presidency, which she is honored to have been part of as his Secretary of State. While they've had honest differences on some issues, including aspects of the wicked challenge Syria presents, she has explained those differences in her book and at many points since then. Some are now choosing to hype those differences but they do not eclipse their broad agreement on most issues," said a statement from Nick Merrill, a Clinton spokesman.
more @
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/clinton-apologizes-obama-foreign-policy-firestorm-n179001 (http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/first-read/clinton-apologizes-obama-foreign-policy-firestorm-n179001)
Ok so Shrillary criticizes his foreign policy, yet for most of his administration SHE was the voice shaping it. SHE was the Secretary of State, her job was to do nothing but ADVISE the President on foreign policy issues.
As I said before, the pot calls the kettle black, well pot meet the kettle, kettle meet the pot.
They're both two sides of the same coin.
Hopefully this next election season the American people will know it's time to throw that coin out. ;)
Quote from: daidalos on August 12, 2014, 08:58:14 PM
Ok so Shrillary criticizes his foreign policy, yet for most of his administration SHE was the voice shaping it. SHE was the Secretary of State, her job was to do nothing but ADVISE the President on foreign policy issues.
As I said before, the pot calls the kettle black, well pot meet the kettle, kettle meet the pot.
They're both two sides of the same coin.
Hopefully this next election season the American people will know it's time to throw that coin out. ;)
The American people will believe the MSM unless we and like-minded conservatives keep the social media hot. The different voting pools get their news from places like facebook instead of the local newspaper or the various leftists leaning news stations on TV. This forum is near an excellent source of truth in politics and does have a rather large viewing audience.
Americans are getting edgy with all of the problems that are coming about, here and abroad. These same people will want to protect themselves and one way to do that is to listen to search out different opinions. They are seeing already that
terrorism is a threat that just isn't going away and they are wondering what would happen if more incidents like 9-11 were to happen here. Who could forget 9-11? It is a painful reminder of just what could happen again if the threat remains as it now is. With no border security, terrorism is assured. With no counsel, the masses will fall. Bozo has to go.