Quote from: joesixpack on November 23, 2019, 07:28:08 AM
Yes. The time. The White House already knew they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

The reason I say that The White House knew is because the whistleblower complaint was given to the Acting DNI on 8/26/19.

In his testimony, the Acting DNI claimed that he didn't forward it to Congress, as legally obligated, because the complaint was against the President and had Executive Privilege.

He instead went to The White House and told them about the complaint. They summarily, told him not to forward it along to Congress.

During that 4 hour gap between text messages you posted on 09/09/19, Sondland called Trump directly, and that's when Trump emphatically denied a quid pro quo after having Sondland et al. working hard towards it.

That's the same day that Congress was finally informed by the ICIG.

When the Acting DNI was asked directly if he had spoken with President Trump about the whistleblower complaint, he neither confirmed nor denied.

Doing what?? The transcript of the phone call was released, we have all seen there is NOTHING. The hearings are over, there were no actual witnesses to ANYTHING! There was one jackass who PRESUMED there was a bribe, which means he made it up. If you have proof, please share it, the democrats are waiting for something.

Quote from: s3779m on November 23, 2019, 02:13:19 PM
Doing what?? The transcript of the phone call was released, we have all seen there is NOTHING. The hearings are over, there were no actual witnesses to ANYTHING! There was one jackass who PRESUMED there was a bribe, which means he made it up. If you have proof, please share it, the democrats are waiting for something.

They're biting at anything now. Hell, I'm surprised I wasn't called as a witness, since I didn't hear anything either.

Quote from: joesixpack on November 23, 2019, 07:28:08 AM
Yes. The time. The White House already knew they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar.

The reason I say that The White House knew is because the whistleblower complaint was given to the Acting DNI on 8/26/19.

In his testimony, the Acting DNI claimed that he didn't forward it to Congress, as legally obligated, because the complaint was against the President and had Executive Privilege.

He instead went to The White House and told them about the complaint. They summarily, told him not to forward it along to Congress.

During that 4 hour gap between text messages you posted on 09/09/19, Sondland called Trump directly, and that's when Trump emphatically denied a quid pro quo after having Sondland et al. working hard towards it.

That's the same day that Congress was finally informed by the ICIG.

When the Acting DNI was asked directly if he had spoken with President Trump about the whistleblower complaint, he neither confirmed nor denied.

I asked you before not to post fake news, yet you keep doing it.  The first article, for example, recycles media-parroted lies.  For example, "the investigation was dormant".  If you knew anything about the story, you would have rejected the article.

You don't even have the story correct about the IG.  Quit posting lies.

If you wish to defend your pretend position about "the timeline", please do so.  You just posted fake news.  YOU need to defend your lies.

Also, do not embed your links.  Post them out in the open so people can see them.

Quote from: Solar on November 23, 2019, 02:18:49 PM


They're biting at anything now. Hell, I'm surprised I wasn't called as a witness, since I didn't hear anything either.

Well, can you make something up? That's just as good.

Also, Glenn Beck (who has been amazing as of late) posted a great rundown on Ukraine and the fake news that idiots circulate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J2A5YI_dsg

Quote from: s3779m on November 23, 2019, 02:46:59 PM
Well, can you make something up? That's just as good.

Not unlike the Marxist Dims, mine too is merely "Opinion". 

John Solomon nails 28 facts to Vindman's fat ass:

https://johnsolomonreports.com/responding-to-lt-col-vindman-about-my-ukraine-columns-with-the-facts/

Quote from: ldub23 on November 22, 2019, 03:51:46 PM
If quid pro quo is an impeachable  offence wouldnt everyone  in congress  be  impeached?

Not to mention every president and every ambassador because quid pro quo is the backbone of foreign policy and foreign aid.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on November 23, 2019, 05:10:39 PM
Not to mention every president and every ambassador because quid pro quo is the backbone of foreign policy and foreign aid.

I know - right? If Trump was leveraging for a personal gain / favor, like Biden did for his son, that's a problem. Clearly illegal.

But Trump is POTUS that we elected to enforce the law. Even if he were holding aid as leverage, it would be to coerce into upholding the law. But, as the transcript shows, there was no indication of him using this tactic. So Trump is clean either way.

I don't understand what possible charge the Dims are making - other than they don't want Trump as POTUS. The Dims are embarrassing. It's good of them to help re-elect Trump.

Quote from: Bronx on November 21, 2019, 07:34:59 AM
You gotta be friggin' kidding me right......? Is your mind that corrupt you can't see the light of day.

These text are in "real time" and now you are saying Trump is covering his tracks because he got "caught"........caught is when something happened already.





C'mon man I believe you are smarter then that or I'm I misstaken. Maybe, just maybe Sondland changed his mind because his hotel business were being destroyed by protested lead Democrat Congressman Earl Blumenauer which after Sondland testimony called off his war dogs and said..."welcome to the resistance".

https://www.wweek.com/news/2019/11/20/congressman-earl-blumenauer-tweets-gordon-sondland-welcome-to-the-resistance/

Quote from: Sauce on November 21, 2019, 11:24:24 AM
Well of course PDJT jumped in his uncle's time machine, the original Electric Tesla, and hacked into Sondland and Taylors texts to fit the narrative ;-)

Quote from: Bronx on November 21, 2019, 12:19:36 PM
What you don't like the Deleon........

I understand people have sides but when I heard Sondland state there was quid pro quo I also said rot roh now let's hear the hard evidence and bingo as you can see from above Sondland testimony got shot down.

I really believe he wanted the boycott of his hotel business to stop so he reverse course. When  he did the boycott stopped.

But hell I take a ride in the Deleon every once in a while also......

Bronx,

Gotta look up Trumps uncle and his crossing paths with Nikola Tesla.....intriguing to ay the least

Here is a leaning leftist video breakdown of the theory, but its a humorous watch if nothing else.

Interesting that it mentions 4chan and predates Q's arrival

https://youtu.be/ZdBrlu7nUhs


(edited to add previous conversation quotes for context)

Quote from: Sauce on November 24, 2019, 05:44:41 PM


Bronx,

Gotta look up Trumps uncle and his crossing paths with Nikola Tesla.....intriguing to ay the least

Here is a leaning leftist video breakdown of the theory, but its a humorous watch if nothing else.

Interesting that it mentions 4chan and predates Q's arrival

https://youtu.be/ZdBrlu7nUhs


(edited to add previous conversation quotes for context)

That was hilarious.

Like a couple of comments stated ......it's more believable than CNN and the Russian hoax.