That would be a conservative wet dream, bases on the border.

But if we can get stuck with Obama for 8 years of marxist-jihadist-reparations wet dreams, we should be able to return the favor.

Quote from: Solar on April 03, 2013, 05:17:38 AM
Actually started in the 40s, but the left started courting them with freebies in the 60s here in Ca and the Pubs looked the other way.
By the 70s the leftists were pushing laws forcing the taxpayer to accept the fact that Mexicans could come here and have babies at our expense (instant citizen) and the rest is history.

But I see no mention of Reagan in the article, did that evil bastard drag 3 million over the boarder as slaves again?

Actually I mispelled Reagan (Regan). I'm a two finger typist. sometimes they don't hit where they're supposed to.

I was referring to the 1986 Amnesty Bill that Regan signed that was supposed to be for the 3.5 million Illegals already in the country, but it turned out to be more like 5 million. They have since been streaming in like water through a screen door.

If Americans were to pour into Mexico they'd be locked up in federal prisons for years before they could get a court date.

Now they are pouring into the US in anticipation of the next ill advised Amnesty plan or Amnesty Light if one is a Republican liberal.

PC=Undocuemnted Relocation and Affirmation Program or some such nonsense.

Now that I've phased it, I'll expect to see it in the news shortly.

IMHO

Quote from: BobH. on April 03, 2013, 04:41:17 PM
Actually I mispelled Reagan (Regan). I'm a two finger typist. sometimes they don't hit where they're supposed to.

I was referring to the 1986 Amnesty Bill that Regan signed that was supposed to be for the 3.5 million Illegals already in the country, but it turned out to be more like 5 million. They have since been streaming in like water through a screen door.

If Americans were to pour into Mexico they'd be locked up in federal prisons for years before they could get a court date.

Now they are pouring into the US in anticipation of the next ill advised Amnesty plan or Amnesty Light if one is a Republican liberal.

PC=Undocuemnted Relocation and Affirmation Program or some such nonsense.

Now that I've phased it, I'll expect to see it in the news shortly.

IMHO

Shock, stop the presses, the Dim House lied to Reagan about a border fence?
I remember it quite well, the libs have always let illegals in simply to vote, it's always been that way.
Reagan was willing to let those already here, stay under an agreement that there would be border controls, and as soon as he signed the Bill, the left reneged on the deal, as someone else pointed out earlier.

I really don't get your point, unless this is somehow new news to you that libs lie.

As long as there is not effective border control -- and there is now no effective border control, and there hasn't been, and there won't be as long as the Kenyan is in office -- immigration laws don't really matter that much. All the negative effects are in place.

Now we have the spectacle of the United States government more or less officially refusing to enforce its own immigration policies, AND we have the Administration Press (the AP) telling us that "illegal immigrant" is not a suitable term to use when "reporting news," as they call shilling for Democrats these days, AND we have waves of what some used to call "wetbacks" flooding across the border -- wet and dry -- in anticipation of possible (but unlikely) new restrictions on immigration and especially naturalization.

Quote from: TboneAgain on April 03, 2013, 10:55:01 PM
As long as there is not effective border control -- and there is now no effective border control, and there hasn't been, and there won't be as long as the Kenyan is in office -- immigration laws don't really matter that much. All the negative effects are in place.

Now we have the spectacle of the United States government more or less officially refusing to enforce its own immigration policies, AND we have the Administration Press (the AP) telling us that "illegal immigrant" is not a suitable term to use when "reporting news," as they call shilling for Democrats these days, AND we have waves of what some used to call "wetbacks" flooding across the border -- wet and dry -- in anticipation of possible (but unlikely) new restrictions on immigration and especially naturalization.

That's just it, it's all theater, it's more distraction from the real issue, economy and unemployment.
But what does Husein do? He tries to paint the Right as racist and claims we need new immigration laws,.

There is nothing wrong with the old ones, but using the issue as theater is all this is, pure distraction.

Hmm..."wetbacks"  A wetback is a wetback, NO matter what you call them.

Quote from: The Boo Man... on April 03, 2013, 12:09:42 PM
Jasmine had the easiest idea. Shoot themas they cross. They will soon get the message.

Arm some drones. Save the driving. The buzzards will clean up what's left.

If you want enforce the laws already on the books like immigration and gun control why pass another law that you want enforce.  Congress doesn't have a backbone.  All they do is pander to what ever group is loudest at that moment in time.

Quote from: quiller on April 04, 2013, 08:49:57 AM
Arm some drones. Save the driving. The buzzards will clean up what's left.

ehhh... some of those guys really stink...