Bret Baier: FBI Sources Believe Clinton Foundation Case Moving Towards "Likely an Indictment"

snip~
Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

more and video @
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html


Adjusted font size on address.

The only thing good in all of this, is we're alive to witness history. Good or bad, it's all unfolding before our very eyes.
The two worst leftist politicians in American history. Trump, a lib propped up by the leftist media to get Hillary elected as well as nominated by the RNC to keep a Conservative from beating Hillary and Righting the Nation, and we're here to witness the biggest fraud in American politics.
It's been a Hell of a ride....

Yes friends, the RNC is just another branch of the DNC.

Link?

Quote from: mrclose on November 03, 2016, 01:41:49 AM
1. The Clinton Foundation investigation is far more expansive than anybody has reported so far and has been going on for more than a year.

2. The laptops of Clinton aides Cherryl Mills and Heather Samuelson have not been destroyed, and agents are currently combing through them. The investigation has interviewed several people twice, and plans to interview some for a third time.

3. Agents have found emails believed to have originated on Hillary Clinton's secret server on Anthony Weiner's laptop. They say the emails are not duplicates and could potentially be classified in nature.

4. Sources within the FBI have told him that an indictment is "likely" in the case of pay-for-play at the Clinton Foundation, "barring some obstruction in some way" from the Justice Department.

5. FBI sources say with 99% accuracy that Hillary Clinton's server has been hacked by at least five foreign intelligence agencies, and that information had been taken from it.

Quote from: mrclose on November 03, 2016, 02:05:43 AM
If you go to the link in Walks post .. It's all there.

So we were required to guess this, as you did not say so? Get serious with links.

Quote from: walkstall on November 02, 2016, 09:20:52 PM
Adjusted font size on address.

Showing off the new bifocals, are you? Or is 5-pt. reserved for only you and 8-pt. is all we peons are offered here, hey? 

Quote from: quiller on November 03, 2016, 07:04:02 AM
Showing off the new bifocals, are you? Or is 5-pt. reserved for only you and 8-pt. is all we peons are offered here, hey? 

I move over to Transitions Bifocal Lenses years ago.  I now need to go in and have my cataract removed soon.  I need to have that done before getting new lenses.  After that I may be able to use 2-pt. 

Quote from: walkstall on November 03, 2016, 07:34:56 AM
I move over to Transitions Bifocal Lenses years ago.  I now need to go in and have my cataract removed soon.  I need to have that done before getting new lenses.  After that I may be able to use 2-pt.

That's the HEADLINE size our Noose Media will use if the feds ever do go after the Foundation. By now Bubba and Shrill have probably moved everything but petty cash offshore.

Quote from: quiller on November 03, 2016, 07:44:28 AM

That's the HEADLINE size our Noose Media will use if the feds ever do go after the Foundation. By now Bubba and Shrill have probably moved everything but petty cash offshore.

The average citizen would be behind bars long ago on all criminal counts.  Be they black or white.

Quote from: mrclose on November 03, 2016, 02:17:35 PM
I'm guessing that Walks, and those of us who post links to articles is for us to go to the site to Read the article!

I did and I picked out the highlights for discussion.

Why in #ell would I post the same link that Walks had just posted?
Or am I supposed to read the article for you and then tell you that I took the highlights from the article that you didn't bother to take the time to read?

Those 5 points of interest were The 'Focal Point' of the entire article!
Staring you right in the face when you go to the link!

So no, You aren't "required" to guess on anything!

The only requirement is to actually 'click on the link', read the entire article then try to have an honest discussion .. about what you have read on the subject!

I'd suggest that you "get serious" and brush up on your clicking and reading skills?

I generally preface my post with "from the link", that way people know it wasn't your work or that of another site. no big

Quote from: mrclose on November 03, 2016, 02:17:35 PM
I'm guessing that Walks, and those of us who post links to articles is for us to go to the site to Read the article!

I did and I picked out the highlights for discussion.

Why in #ell would I post the same link that Walks had just posted?
Or am I supposed to read the article for you and then tell you that I took the highlights from the article that you didn't bother to take the time to read?

Those 5 points of interest were The 'Focal Point' of the entire article!
Staring you right in the face when you go to the link!

So no, You aren't "required" to guess on anything!

The only requirement is to actually 'click on the link', read the entire article then try to have an honest discussion .. about what you have read on the subject!

I'd suggest that you "get serious" and brush up on your clicking and reading skills?

I've been on-line 15 years. I know the rules of posting by now, and you didn't.

I've seen so many people forget to include a link, but use one ANYWAY from a different source, that I'll just snicker at your post and say, have a nice day.