• Welcome, Guest. Please login.

CONFIRMED: Lindell baited the enemy with fake "pcap" data

Started by taxed, June 10, 2021, 03:08:38 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

taxed


Solar

Quote from: taxed on June 14, 2021, 01:52:42 PMI hope he didn't give them money.  Usually the gullible get suckered.
I can't believe people even turn on the TV anymore. :glare:
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

taxed

Quote from: Solar on June 14, 2021, 01:54:03 PMI can't believe people even turn on the TV anymore. :glare:

Walter needs it.  It helps him know what to think.

Solar

Quote from: taxed on June 14, 2021, 01:54:55 PMWalter needs it.  It helps him know what to think.
Yep, FUX Snooze, where we tell you what, and how to think.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

je_freedom

Quote from: taxed on June 14, 2021, 01:54:55 PMWalter needs it.  It helps him know what to think.

Maybe he needs a better pillow.
Here are the 10 RINOs who voted to impeach Trump on Jan. 13, 2021 - NEVER forget!
WY  Liz Cheney      SC 7  Tom Rice             WA 4  Dan Newhouse    IL 16  Adam Kinzinger    OH 16  Anthony Gonzalez
MI 6  Fred Upton    WA 3  Jaime Herrera Beutler    MI 3  Peter Meijer       NY 24  John Katko       CA 21  David Valadao

T Hunt

Quote from: sataspa on June 11, 2021, 02:46:30 AMAt the risk of sounding as stupid as some here seem to think Lindell wants to seem or sound, I have to agree. I didn't see any MSM coverage of Lindell's data dump, and when I tried to talk about it with people here, nobody knew anything about it. So the Left wasn't fooled. They weren't running around making a big deal about it. But here and other places like this, people were believing everything Lindell seemed to be telling them. If Trump won and still should be President, you'd think that it would be easier to provide straight forward evidence. Where can I find that evidence?

So still no comment on all the hard evidence we showed you against your claim that there was no evidence of election cheating? Why are you ignoring it?

Why do you get quite when the evidence has been presented?
Are you trying to get us to forget we showed it too you so you can come back later and still claim there is none?

sataspa

Quote from: T Hunt on June 16, 2021, 12:16:04 AMSo still no comment on all the hard evidence we showed you against your claim that there was no evidence of election cheating? Why are you ignoring it?

Why do you get quite when the evidence has been presented?
Are you trying to get us to forget we showed it too you so you can come back later and still claim there is none?
I am reading and listening to everything I can find on this topic. If you are asking me if I find your arguments to be convincing or your evidence to be overwhelming, I will have to say not yet.

taxed

Quote from: sataspa on June 16, 2021, 03:19:59 AMI am reading and listening to everything I can find on this topic. If you are asking me if I find your arguments to be convincing or your evidence to be overwhelming, I will have to say not yet.

We're still waiting on an answer to this:

Quote from: taxed on June 11, 2021, 03:04:14 AMWhat would you consider to be "straight forward" evidence?


taxed


T Hunt

Quote from: sataspa on June 16, 2021, 03:19:59 AMI am reading and listening to everything I can find on this topic. If you are asking me if I find your arguments to be convincing or your evidence to be overwhelming, I will have to say not yet.

Are you kidding me with this feigned ignorance crap?

Did you miss this post with tons of hard evidence?
https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/index.php?msg=464824

Now that you have seen it will you retract your claim that there is no evidence of election cheating?

RV

Quote from: T Hunt on June 16, 2021, 09:07:05 AMAre you kidding me with this feigned ignorance crap?

Did you miss this post with tons of hard evidence?
https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/index.php?msg=464824

Now that you have seen it will you retract your claim that there is no evidence of election cheating?

I'm having trouble distinguishing between "fake pcap data" and the blatant lies that the MSM and DNC is pushing out. It seems like we need factual truth rather than "fake" anything from anyone. Maybe Lindell had something in mind, maybe he was trying to excite the Liberals or maybe he was just trying to smoke the criminals out. Whatever his purpose was is not clear to me. As I said, there is far too much fake news, what needs to be pushed out are facts, truth and real data showing either that fraud happened, (as I suspect), or that the Libs were right and everything is on the up and up.
RV

"Trust in the Lord with all of your heart and lean not unto thine own understanding. In all thy ways acknowledge Him and He shall direct thy path."

sataspa

Quote from: RV on June 16, 2021, 12:46:09 PMI'm having trouble distinguishing between "fake pcap data" and the blatant lies that the MSM and DNC is pushing out. It seems like we need factual truth rather than "fake" anything from anyone. Maybe Lindell had something in mind, maybe he was trying to excite the Liberals or maybe he was just trying to smoke the criminals out. Whatever his purpose was is not clear to me. As I said, there is far too much fake news, what needs to be pushed out are facts, truth and real data showing either that fraud happened, (as I suspect), or that the Libs were right and everything is on the up and up.
I basically agree. Fancy graphics are not hard evidence. Neither is any website which exists to tell you what you want to hear. If Biden is not supposed to be President, show me something which is not inane, arcane, profane or insane. Where I live, people believe that Biden won and Trump lost. If Lindell has proof and is holding on to it for whatever reason, he should produce it immediately if not sooner.

taxed

Quote from: sataspa on June 16, 2021, 01:36:55 PMI basically agree. Fancy graphics are not hard evidence.

That's like saying a fancy graphic of a stock market crash is not evidence of a market crash.  Your desire to build straw-men will not be effective here, just FYI.

QuoteNeither is any website which exists to tell you what you want to hear.

Please post evidence from a website that Biden won from a website that doesn't tell us what we want to hear.

QuoteIf Biden is not supposed to be President,

You need to cut this "if" shit out.  FACT: You have no evidence that Creepy won, yet we have an ocean of evidence that Trump won.


Quoteshow me something which is not inane, arcane, profane or insane.

Post an example.


QuoteWhere I live, people believe that Biden won and Trump lost.

No. Nobody believes that outside of a handful of anti-Trump radicals and losers.


QuoteIf Lindell has proof and is holding on to it for whatever reason, he should produce it immediately if not sooner.

He is.  He's doing a massive convention with cyber-security professionals to come and scrutinze the data that you will ignore.

If you don't have the ballots, you didn't win the election.  It's that simple.

sataspa

https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/28/politics/poll-qanon-election-conspiracies/index.html

Here in urban and suburban NJ, most people believe this. People who still insist that Trump is still President are increasingly considered crackpots who are being marginalized. I joined here hoping to get information that I could take back to my people so that they might reconsider, but instead I find myself being mocked or called a liberal. We are never going to get Trump back in the WH with the evidence and arguments that I am reading here.

taxed

Quote from: sataspa on June 16, 2021, 02:07:29 PMhttps://www.cnn.com/2021/05/28/politics/poll-qanon-election-conspiracies/index.html

I didn't ask about crackpot fake-news websites like CNN.  I asked you to provide a piece of data that you believe supports Creepy won, or a piece of evidence provided by us that you don't believe or is wrong.


QuoteHere in urban and suburban NJ, most people believe this. People who still insist that Trump is still President are increasingly considered crackpots who are being marginalized. I joined here hoping to get information that I could take back to my people so that they might reconsider, but instead I find myself being mocked or called a liberal. We are never going to get Trump back in the WH with the evidence and arguments that I am reading here.

You are unable to provide a piece of data for discussion.  You know we know that, right?