Quote from: daidalos on May 28, 2015, 12:01:40 PM
Look, the voters of the United States elected Obama, even after the media showed us all the church he sat in for twenty years.

We all knew exactly what he would do in the M.E. because we all knew he attended a madrasas. And that he has a muslim father.

Obama had the entire MSM running cover for him. Romney didn't.

QuoteMitt Romney had zero chance in hell of being elected. Especially after the whole "if you criticize Obama you are racist" crap started up.

If that were true, the DNC and the MSM wouldn't have needed the "If you criticize Obama you're a racits" B.S.. The Libs will always tell you what they are the most afraid of - in this case, they were afraid of Romney engaging Obama Mano a mano! The reason Romney lost was because he was stupid enough to take the other side's advice on how to win!

QuoteI mean WTF? Two candidates can run, but only one is allowed to be critical or point out the errors in the platform of their opposition?

If you wait for your opponent's blessing to criticize his platform and/or his performance, you are going to be waiting a very long time! 

QuoteThese riots we've seen, and Obama's stirring the pot to create them aside. He even used race baiting to get elected in the first place.

Obama is not concerned that his actions might cause a race war in the U.S.... he is counting on it!

So then, Coulter's thrashing is exactly whats needed. Someone who isn't afraid to tell the truth about Obama, and Sharpton etc...I don't think yet however, that on a fundamental level Americans as a whole would ever tolerate it. I think most Americans can see who's holding the spoon, stirring the pot, and overwhelmingly deplore it.