Ann Coulter did an interview with mexican Jorge Ramos and walked all over him....   

https://youtu.be/l4lsOb-j3o0

Unfortunately I can't watch it. But something like this raises more questions than it answers.
Who had the pull to orchestrate this interview with a person that carried water for Mitten and made herself irrelevant over night, trashed TEA and has yet to apologize for it?

Answer: GOPe, the rino are behind this Coulter revival, and regardless of the outcome, Coulter stabbed the base (TEA) in the back. 
Sure, like Carly Fiorina, not having a chance in Hell of taking the POTUS slot, but I appreciate the message and what she does to the left, but the difference in her and a Coulter type character, is Fiorina is sincere, Coulter is a pawn of the Establishment.

I just wanted to clarify this point to our readers that aren't familiar with the inner workings of the GOP and it's so called leadership.
Oh, and for those of you not familiar with the moniker Mitten, that's a reference to a soft rino, Mitt Romney, a weak man with soft hands, so weak, they need to be protected by mittens.

I view all these rino as Mittens. It's time to take the gloves off and smack the shit out of these Marxists.

Quote from: Solar on May 27, 2015, 05:11:43 AM
Unfortunately I can't watch it. But something like this raises more questions than it answers.
Who had the pull to orchestrate this interview with a person that carried water for Mitten and made herself irrelevant over night, trashed TEA and has yet to apologize for it?

Answer: GOPe, the rino are behind this Coulter revival, and regardless of the outcome, Coulter stabbed the base (TEA) in the back. 
Sure, like Carly Fiorina, not having a chance in Hell of taking the POTUS slot, but I appreciate the message and what she does to the left, but the difference in her and a Coulter type character, is Fiorina is sincere, Coulter is a pawn of the Establishment.

I just wanted to clarify this point to our readers that aren't familiar with the inner workings of the GOP and it's so called leadership.
Oh, and for those of you not familiar with the moniker Mitten, that's a reference to a soft rino, Mitt Romney, a weak man with soft hands, so weak, they need to be protected by mittens.

I view all these rino as Mittens. It's time to take the gloves off and smack the shit out of these Marxists.

While I agree that Romney is a RINO, I would be reticent to call him "soft". Look at the way he took out his opponents in the Republican Primary. He can be tough as nails when he wants to be.

The reason he lost in 2012, was simple. He refused to engage Obama! I think there are two reasons for this. First, was the campaign advisers. They were all retreads from the McCain election run in 2008. They basically ran the same campaign for Romney that they did for McCain - with similar results.

The Second, and less known reason (IMHO) has to do with Romney's Mormon religion. LDS teaching says that the Black Race are descendents of Cain and are a "cursed" race. Indeed, blacks weren't allowed to become full members of the Church until the mid-1970s. I think it was this history of the Mormon Church and fear that it would rise to the surface during the campaign, that kept Romney from going after Obama the way he went after his Republican competitors during the primary.

Quote from: Solar on May 27, 2015, 05:11:43 AM
Unfortunately I can't watch it. But something like this raises more questions than it answers.
Who had the pull to orchestrate this interview with a person that carried water for Mitten and made herself irrelevant over night, trashed TEA and has yet to apologize for it?

Answer: GOPe, the rino are behind this Coulter revival, and regardless of the outcome, Coulter stabbed the base (TEA) in the back. 
Sure, like Carly Fiorina, not having a chance in Hell of taking the POTUS slot, but I appreciate the message and what she does to the left, but the difference in her and a Coulter type character, is Fiorina is sincere, Coulter is a pawn of the Establishment.

I just wanted to clarify this point to our readers that aren't familiar with the inner workings of the GOP and it's so called leadership.
Oh, and for those of you not familiar with the moniker Mitten, that's a reference to a soft rino, Mitt Romney, a weak man with soft hands, so weak, they need to be protected by mittens.

I view all these rino as Mittens. It's time to take the gloves off and smack the shit out of these Marxists.

I appreciate your perspective on Coulter.  Although I have most of her books in my library and feel that she has done some phenomenal research..... I too agree that she has been inconsistent and down right irritating at times.  I was furious when she backed Christie earlier.  Now she is against Christie because of his stance on amnesty.

If she is indeed a shill for the Establishment, why is she so adamantly against amnesty?

But she has indeed been disrespectful of TEA at times, and at other times she has been a seeming supporter (in our early days).  She is the epitome of the current dichotomy within the GOP.   

The splintering of the Party is in fact a good sign.  We must first divide before we can conquer.

Quote from: Darth Fife on May 27, 2015, 06:27:35 AM

The Second, and less known reason (IMHO) has to do with Romney's Mormon religion. LDS teaching says that the Black Race are descendents of Cain and are a "cursed" race. Indeed, blacks weren't allowed to become full members of the Church until the mid-1970s. I think it was this history of the Mormon Church and fear that it would rise to the surface during the campaign, that kept Romney from going after Obama the way he went after his Republican competitors during the primary.

I really don't think enough Americans have that much knowledge of the LDSs to have made a significant difference in the race.

It was the GOP base that thought Romney was a retread of McCain... and didn't bother to vote!  They were disgusted with the Party's no fight in the belly to win.

Quote from: kroz on May 27, 2015, 06:55:07 AM
I really don't think enough Americans have that much knowledge of the LDSs to have made a significant difference in the race.

It was the GOP base that thought Romney was a retread of McCain... and didn't bother to vote!  They were disgusted with the Party's no fight in the belly to win.

I think you would be surprised how many do.  Also when the LSM and Dem's got through with it they would for sure.

Quote from: Darth Fife on May 27, 2015, 06:27:35 AM
While I agree that Romney is a RINO, I would be reticent to call him "soft". Look at the way he took out his opponents in the Republican Primary. He can be tough as nails when he wants to be.

The reason he lost in 2012, was simple. He refused to engage Obama! I think there are two reasons for this. First, was the campaign advisers. They were all retreads from the McCain election run in 2008. They basically ran the same campaign for Romney that they did for McCain - with similar results.

Translation: Weak! He is the one running, and if he doesn't have the balls to run his own campaign, that failure is his and his alone.

QuoteThe Second, and less known reason (IMHO) has to do with Romney's Mormon religion. LDS teaching says that the Black Race are descendents of Cain and are a "cursed" race. Indeed, blacks weren't allowed to become full members of the Church until the mid-1970s. I think it was this history of the Mormon Church and fear that it would rise to the surface during the campaign, that kept Romney from going after Obama the way he went after his Republican competitors during the primary.

Only a bigot would hold that nonsense against him, and a terribly obscure point that less than 1% of the nation would know, let alone care about.
That's like connection a Christian to that of the first century.

Quote from: kroz on May 27, 2015, 06:55:07 AM
I really don't think enough Americans have that much knowledge of the LDSs to have made a significant difference in the race.

It was the GOP base that thought Romney was a retread of McCain... and didn't bother to vote!  They were disgusted with the Party's no fight in the belly to win.

I agree, considering most people only see LDS as a part of Christianity and the fact that they don't force their ideology on anyone, and the fact that they believe in American culture where an intact family is concerned.

Quote from: kroz on May 27, 2015, 06:49:47 AM
I appreciate your perspective on Coulter.  Although I have most of her books in my library and feel that she has done some phenomenal research..... I too agree that she has been inconsistent and down right irritating at times.  I was furious when she backed Christie earlier.  Now she is against Christie because of his stance on amnesty.h

If she is indeed a shill for the Establishment, why is she so adamantly against amnesty?

But she has indeed been disrespectful of TEA at times, and at other times she has been a seeming supporter (in our early days).  She is the epitome of the current dichotomy within the GOP.   

The splintering of the Party is in fact a good sign.  We must first divide before we can conquer.

We who are true conservatives fully understand Coulter. However, she has value for the GOP for no other reason than she makes democrat heads explode. Therefore, she is a good distraction for democrats to spend time trying to discredit her.

She pretty much wiped the floor with Ramos, who couldn't even pass for a lib troll.  He's really bad.  Plus, during audience questions, they were all over the map.  One libtard tried to attribute a pro-abortion quote to Coulter, which anyone knows is ridiculous.  The funniest part was the guy who stood up and identified as illegal, and Coulter asked if he was legal, and he said he is undocumented, and she said "Good.  I'm going to call Sheriff Joe.".  For a millisecond, you could see fear in the guy's eyes.  That made me laugh my ass off.

Quote from: taxed on May 27, 2015, 05:23:05 PM
She pretty much wiped the floor with Ramos, who couldn't even pass for a lib troll.  He's really bad.  Plus, during audience questions, they were all over the map.  One libtard tried to attribute a pro-abortion quote to Coulter, which anyone knows is ridiculous.  The funniest part was the guy who stood up and identified, and Coulter asked if he was legal, and he said he is undocumented, and she said "Good.  I'm going to call Sheriff Joe.".  For a millisecond, you could see fear in the guy's eyes.  That made me laugh my ass off.

Quote from: Solar on May 27, 2015, 07:18:43 AM
Only a bigot would hold that nonsense against him, and a terribly obscure point that less than 1% of the nation would know, let alone care about.
That's like connection a Christian to that of the first century.

And we know that the Democrats and the MSM would never do anything like that!

Quote from: Darth Fife on May 28, 2015, 06:25:35 AM
And we know that the Democrats and the MSM would never do anything like that!

Does it really matter what an idiot is willing to believe? If they're that stupid, then they'd have voted Dim anyway.

Quote from: kroz on May 27, 2015, 06:49:47 AM
If she is indeed a shill for the Establishment, why is she so adamantly against amnesty?

To stay relevant and keep making money on conservatives. Which is perfectly fine, our side have a lot of pundits. Which I guess we need because in most other mediums we get pommeled with leftist bs.

Quote from: Darth Fife on May 27, 2015, 06:27:35 AM
While I agree that Romney is a RINO, I would be reticent to call him "soft". Look at the way he took out his opponents in the Republican Primary. He can be tough as nails when he wants to be.

The reason he lost in 2012, was simple. He refused to engage Obama! I think there are two reasons for this. First, was the campaign advisers. They were all retreads from the McCain election run in 2008. They basically ran the same campaign for Romney that they did for McCain - with similar results.

The Second, and less known reason (IMHO) has to do with Romney's Mormon religion. LDS teaching says that the Black Race are descendents of Cain and are a "cursed" race. Indeed, blacks weren't allowed to become full members of the Church until the mid-1970s. I think it was this history of the Mormon Church and fear that it would rise to the surface during the campaign, that kept Romney from going after Obama the way he went after his Republican competitors during the primary.

Look, the voters of the United States elected Obama, even after the media showed us all the church he sat in for twenty years.

We all knew exactly what he would do in the M.E. because we all knew he attended a madrasas. And that he has a muslim father.

Mitt Romney had zero chance in hell of being elected. Especially after the whole "if you criticize Obama you are racist" crap started up.

I mean WTF? Two candidates can run, but only one is allowed to be critical or point out the errors in the platform of their opposition?

These riots we've seen, and Obama's stirring the pot to create them aside. He even used race baiting to get elected in the first place.