Conservative Political Forum

General Category => Political Discussion and Debate => Topic started by: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 08:17:10 AM

Title: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 08:17:10 AM
QuoteThe federal prosecutor Attorney General Bill Barr tapped to investigate whether Obama administration officials improperly requested the unmasking of individuals during the 2016 election has concluded his probe without "finding any substantive wrongdoing," The Washington Post reported Tuesday.

Barr appointed U.S. Attorney John Bash to review whether there was wrongdoing by the Obama administration in requesting the identities of individuals — in particular Trump allies — whose names are redacted in intelligence reports during the heated election.

The practice, known as unmasking, is common and done to help government officials make sense of the intelligence documents they are reviewing, but President Trump and his allies have alleged that Obama-era officials acted improperly in making a series of unmasking requests that ultimately led to former Trump campaign aide Michael Flynn's name being unmasked.

According to the Post, Bash and his team reviewed unmasking practices as well as whether officials at the time improperly leaked information to reporters. Bash reportedly turned over his findings to Barr, whose office chose not to publicly release them. The findings did not rise to the allegations Trump and his allies have made about wrongdoing, according to the report.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/520922-unmasking-probe-concludes-without-finding-any-substantive-wrongdoing


Will Trump fire Barr on twitter? Barr is such an anti-MAGA tool. He won't release the report? Why, it must be a conspiracy! What did the MAGA prophet Q tell us about the unmasking?
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 10:06:37 AM
QuoteThe U.S. Justice Department has ended its probe into whether Obama administration officials improperly "unmasked" associates of now-President Donald Trump mentioned in intelligence reports, two congressional sources said on Wednesday.

It found no wrongdoing, one of the sources said.

Unmasking refers to the naming of U.S. citizens whose identities were blacked out in reports from the National Security Agency that captured their communications with a foreign national.

Trump and his allies have sought to portray the use of the process during the administration of his Democratic predecessor, President Barack Obama, as a misuse of government authority.

It is a routine practice, and Trump administration officials have made thousands of such requests, government statistics show.

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/u-s--quietly-ends-probe-of-obama-era--unmasking--of-trump-allies--sources/46097378
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: supsalemgr on October 14, 2020, 11:18:33 AM
Quote from: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 10:06:37 AM
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/u-s--quietly-ends-probe-of-obama-era--unmasking--of-trump-allies--sources/46097378

I am sure you are aware this info is from unnamed sources.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 11:44:09 AM
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 14, 2020, 11:18:33 AM
I am sure you are aware this info is from unnamed sources.

Spin away. Unmasking is a nothingburger. Or was a "secret report" passed from Barr to Trump in prep for the "Q Storm"?  :lol:
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 14, 2020, 11:51:09 AM
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 14, 2020, 11:18:33 AM
I am sure you are aware this info is from unnamed sources.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Nailed it! Just more fake news.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: supsalemgr on October 14, 2020, 12:13:51 PM
Quote from: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 11:44:09 AM
Spin away. Unmasking is a nothingburger. Or was a "secret report" passed from Barr to Trump in prep for the "Q Storm"?  :lol:

You should be grateful you have found a forum that allows folks to share their OPINIONS.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: walkstall on October 14, 2020, 03:47:01 PM
Quote from: supsalemgr on October 14, 2020, 12:13:51 PM
You should be grateful you have found a forum that allows folks to share their OPINIONS.

OPINIONS?  All this time I was thinking it's a LEFT BS agenda.  Sleepy Joe is in deep shit and he knows it. 
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: taxed on October 14, 2020, 06:51:11 PM
Quote from: Barricade on October 14, 2020, 08:17:10 AM
https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/520922-unmasking-probe-concludes-without-finding-any-substantive-wrongdoing


Will Trump fire Barr on twitter? Barr is such an anti-MAGA tool. He won't release the report? Why, it must be a conspiracy! What did the MAGA prophet Q tell us about the unmasking?

Where did the DOJ say no indictments or wrongdoing with the unmasking probe?  Post it.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: redbeard on October 14, 2020, 07:03:37 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 06:51:11 PM
Where did the DOJ say no indictments or wrongdoing with the unmasking probe?  Post it.
My understanding is this report is where the investigation is not that its over! the man quit his position and i believe it is just a status report! Time will tell if Barr appoints someone to finish the investigation! Last week their were rumors his next in command would.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: taxed on October 14, 2020, 07:23:07 PM
Quote from: redbeard on October 14, 2020, 07:03:37 PM
My understanding is this report is where the investigation is not that its over! the man quit his position and i believe it is just a status report! Time will tell if Barr appoints someone to finish the investigation! Last week their were rumors his next in command would.

All of this is fake news until we here it from Barr or Kupec.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 14, 2020, 07:36:20 PM
I heard it on the radio this evening. My question is how in the world can there not be substantial wrongdoing?
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 14, 2020, 07:44:18 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 07:23:07 PM
All of this is fake news until we here it from Barr or Kupec.
I think this is why Barr said it may not be released before the election, everything was fucked up by the idiot that bailed.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: taxed on October 14, 2020, 07:50:27 PM
Quote from: RV on October 14, 2020, 07:36:20 PM
I heard it on the radio this evening. My question is how in the world can there not be substantial wrongdoing?

List the crimes to their statues, and post the evidence you're holding.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 14, 2020, 08:08:48 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 07:50:27 PM
List the crimes to their statues, and post the evidence you're holding.

Apparently you either could not or did not read what my post said. I stated quite clearly that I heard it on the RADIO. I cannot "post anything" that I heard.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: redbeard on October 14, 2020, 08:14:58 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 07:50:27 PM
List the crimes to their statues, and post the evidence you're holding.
Any prosecutor in this case would have a real problem proving intent! The people that did the unmasking had the power to do it and for it to be a crime you have to prove they were doing it for elicit reasons! Doesn't mean you can charge someone for it but someone in the chain of custody needs to roll over! What information they have found here could very well be used by John Durum as pieces of the puzzle he is putting together. Just because there is no indictment doesn't mean there isn't usable evidence and timelines to help the main probe!
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: taxed on October 14, 2020, 08:16:31 PM
Quote from: redbeard on October 14, 2020, 08:14:58 PM
Any prosecutor in this case would have a real problem proving intent! The people that did the unmasking had the power to do it and for it to be a crime you have to prove they were doing it for elicit reasons! Doesn't mean you can charge someone for it but someone in the chain of custody needs to roll over! What information they have found here could very well be used by John Durum as pieces of the puzzle he is putting together. Just because there is no indictment doesn't mean there isn't usable evidence and timelines to help the main probe!

The point with him is he's just screaming "arrest them" without knowing shit of what's going on.  This is turning into a RICO thing, and Durham is piercing the veil of the SSCI connection with the media.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Bronx on October 14, 2020, 08:52:48 PM
Yogi Berra said it best...."it ain't over until it's over"................ :thumbsup:


Acting US Attorney Gregg Sofer will pick up 'unmasking' probe: report

Acting US Attorney Gregg Sofer will take up the investigation into the "unmasking" of former national security adviser Michael Flynn after Sofer's predecessor resigned from the Justice Department, according to a report Tuesday.

Sofer was named by Attorney General William Barr to replace John Bash, the US attorney for the Western District of Texas, who announced Monday he is stepping down to take a job in the private sector.

"Without commenting on any specific investigation, any matters that John Bash was overseeing will be assumed by Gregg Sofer," a senior Justice Department official told Fox News.

READ MORE HERE..........
https://nypost.com/2020/10/06/acting-us-attorney-gregg-sofer-to-pick-up-unmasking-probe-report/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: redbeard on October 14, 2020, 08:58:30 PM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 08:16:31 PM
The point with him is he's just screaming "arrest them" without knowing shit of what's going on.  This is turning into a RICO thing, and Durham is piercing the veil of the SSCI connection with the media.
:thumbup:
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 15, 2020, 07:06:14 AM
Quote from: taxed on October 14, 2020, 08:16:31 PM
The point with him is he's just screaming "arrest them" without knowing shit of what's going on.  This is turning into a RICO thing, and Durham is piercing the veil of the SSCI connection with the media.

The truth is that I never scream, never raise my voice and never get excited nor upset by what some nameless, faceless, idiot says/posts on the Internet to nor about me. I learned a long time ago that people will say or post anything. Sometimes they are trying to cover up, sometimes they believe themselves to be "clever", sometimes they are talking out of an abundance of ignorance and sometimes they are talking/posting to incite others to their dogpile. Whatever, I find that things are usually not what they seem so it is best not to get excited by anything that someone claims on the Internet.

Remember that bullies love to travel in packs rather than to stand up by themselves...
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 15, 2020, 07:21:26 AM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 07:06:14 AM
The truth is that I never scream, never raise my voice and never get excited nor upset by what some nameless, faceless, idiot says/posts on the Internet to nor about me. I learned a long time ago that people will say or post anything. Sometimes they are trying to cover up, sometimes they believe themselves to be "clever", sometimes they are talking out of an abundance of ignorance and sometimes they are talking/posting to incite others to their dogpile. Whatever, I find that things are usually not what they seem so it is best not to get excited by anything that someone claims on the Internet.

Remember that bullies love to travel in packs rather than to stand up by themselves...
Wow, yet you get your panties knotted when called on it! But it don't effect you, no sirree... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 15, 2020, 11:23:09 AM
Quote from: Solar on October 15, 2020, 07:21:26 AM
Wow, yet you get your panties knotted when called on it! But it don't effect you, no sirree... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Just because I respond when dolts ASSUME nonsensical rubbish does not mean that "my panties were knotted". Since you don't know me you obviously think that everyone wears "panties" since you do, nothing could be further from the truth. "Called on it"? No, no one called me on anything! A couple of morons assumed that I was upset, assumed that I was like them and wore panties and assumed that the nonsense they were spewing "upset" me.

I will say it again, God has got this and I trust Him completely. That does not mean that I won't do my part, it merely means that I will trust Him with the outcome. There are numerous accounts in scripture where people did what was right and trusted God for the rest.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 15, 2020, 04:04:00 PM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 11:23:09 AM
Just because I respond when dolts ASSUME nonsensical rubbish does not mean that "my panties were knotted". Since you don't know me you obviously think that everyone wears "panties" since you do, nothing could be further from the truth. "Called on it"? No, no one called me on anything! A couple of morons assumed that I was upset, assumed that I was like them and wore panties and assumed that the nonsense they were spewing "upset" me.

I will say it again, God has got this and I trust Him completely. That does not mean that I won't do my part, it merely means that I will trust Him with the outcome. There are numerous accounts in scripture where people did what was right and trusted God for the rest.
Yet, here you are again whining over a comment?

I agree, God is behind Trump's reelection.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:07:23 PM
Quote from: Solar on October 15, 2020, 04:04:00 PM
Yet, here you are again whining over a comment?

I agree, God is behind Trump's reelection.

"Whining?" So you mean anything that anyone says which is not in agreement with you? I haven't "whined" since I was a kid although it's nice that someone is gullible enough to think that I'm still young enough to do that...
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 15, 2020, 04:10:45 PM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:07:23 PM
"Whining?" So you mean anything that anyone says which is not in agreement with you? I haven't "whined" since I was a kid although it's nice that someone is gullible enough to think that I'm still young enough to do that...
Go back and reread your posts. You are probably one of the most sensitive members this forum has ever had.
So, Check your "feelings" at the door, or learn to debate without taking every post personal.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:15:05 PM
Quote from: Solar on October 15, 2020, 04:04:00 PM
I agree, God is behind Trump's reelection.

The creator of the Universe is NOT "behind President Trump's reelection". God is in control regardless of who wins the Presidential election. I guess you pride yourself on twisting other's words, misinterpreting what is written and/or deliberately making assumptions about people. Hmmmm, I was thinking that those traits were only found in the other party...
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 15, 2020, 04:40:46 PM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:15:05 PM
The creator of the Universe is NOT "behind President Trump's reelection". God is in control regardless of who wins the Presidential election. I guess you pride yourself on twisting other's words, misinterpreting what is written and/or deliberately making assumptions about people. Hmmmm, I was thinking that those traits were only found in the other party...

Where did I twist your words?
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: T Hunt on October 15, 2020, 07:52:24 PM
Quote from: RV on October 14, 2020, 07:36:20 PM
I heard it on the radio this evening. My question is how in the world can there not be substantial wrongdoing?

Dont worry, we already know there is.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: T Hunt on October 15, 2020, 07:55:51 PM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 07:06:14 AM
The truth is that I never scream, never raise my voice and never get excited nor upset by what some nameless, faceless, idiot says/posts on the Internet to nor about me. I learned a long time ago that people will say or post anything. Sometimes they are trying to cover up, sometimes they believe themselves to be "clever", sometimes they are talking out of an abundance of ignorance and sometimes they are talking/posting to incite others to their dogpile. Whatever, I find that things are usually not what they seem so it is best not to get excited by anything that someone claims on the Internet.

Remember that bullies love to travel in packs rather than to stand up by themselves...

Are you capable of having a conversation where you dont act condescending and self centered?
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: T Hunt on October 15, 2020, 07:57:11 PM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:15:05 PM
The creator of the Universe is NOT "behind President Trump's reelection". God is in control regardless of who wins the Presidential election. I guess you pride yourself on twisting other's words, misinterpreting what is written and/or deliberately making assumptions about people. Hmmmm, I was thinking that those traits were only found in the other party...

God is definitely  using trump to drain the swamp of evil leftism which is harming his children.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: taxed on October 15, 2020, 07:59:06 PM
Quote from: RV on October 14, 2020, 08:08:48 PM
Apparently you either could not or did not read what my post said. I stated quite clearly that I heard it on the RADIO. I cannot "post anything" that I heard.

I heard Trump was a Russian agent on the radio. Is that true?
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: Solar on October 16, 2020, 07:02:41 AM
Quote from: taxed on October 15, 2020, 07:59:06 PM
I heard Trump was a Russian agent on the radio. Is that true?
I heard Trump was Putin's puppet too. Why do idiots take everything at face value? They read a headline and assume it's true, never once actually reading the article, only to discover everything was taken out of context and backed by "Unknown Sources".
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: MichaelJ on October 16, 2020, 08:05:52 AM
Quote from: RV on October 15, 2020, 04:07:23 PM
"Whining?" So you mean anything that anyone says which is not in agreement with you? I haven't "whined" since I was a kid although it's nice that someone is gullible enough to think that I'm still young enough to do that...

If you TRULY love Jesus, there is no way you could vote for a man that wants to keep and even expand the killing of God's children, namely babies.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: T Hunt on October 16, 2020, 08:18:56 AM
Quote from: MichaelJ on October 16, 2020, 08:05:52 AM
If you TRULY love Jesus, there is no way you could vote for a man that wants to keep and even expand the killing of God's children, namely babies.

The Canaanites that lived in Israel before the Jews moved in sacrificed their babies to Baal. The language literally says they, "Made their sons and daughters pass thru the fire"

Because of this, when God had the Jews invade Palistine and take it from the Canaanites, he told the israelites to kill every last one of them, even their animals, to wipe out every last trace of them for their abhorrent cruelty.

Deuteronomy
Quote16 However, in the cities of the nations the Lord your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes. Completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—as the Lord your God has commanded you. 18 Otherwise, they will teach you to follow all the detestable things they do in worshiping their gods, and you will sin against the Lord your God.
Quote34 And we captured all his cities at that time and devoted to destruction every city, men, women, and children. We left no survivors.

That is what we are now witnessing happening to the dem party/rino establishment and the deepstate globalists.
History repeats. God wins.
Title: Re: 'Unmasking' probe concludes without 'finding any substantive wrongdoing'
Post by: RV on October 17, 2020, 09:13:58 AM
Quote from: taxed on October 15, 2020, 07:59:06 PM
I heard Trump was a Russian agent on the radio. Is that true?

The Leftists will say, claim, post or feed ANY accusation regardless of outlandish nor ridiculous it may be. Is it true? Not to my knowledge but, it COULD be true of China Joe...