http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_ (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_)
Opinions?
Quote from: new_one on November 01, 2012, 01:44:05 PM
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_ (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_)
Opinions?
Can you post an article written by someone intelligent?
Oh great, another Keynesian.
You know the ones Taxed, supply and demand. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Only the Economist would think nothing of walking on the flag.
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.economist.com%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fimagecache%2Ffull-width%2Fimages%2Fprint-edition%2F20121103_LDP001_0.jpg&hash=82927608640f874e427056e8a885aa98917fea1b)
Quote from: Solar on November 01, 2012, 01:53:55 PM
Only the Economist would think nothing of walking on the flag.
Nothing makes a liberal warm and fuzzy like stepping on our flag:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagomag.com%2FChicago-Magazine%2FAugust-2001%2Ffeatures_ayers1.jpg&hash=bc9360ffbb04642e419feed8ed6c9a29f9b9092b)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8)
Quote from: taxed on November 01, 2012, 01:59:13 PM
Nothing makes a liberal warm and fuzzy like stepping on our flag:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagomag.com%2FChicago-Magazine%2FAugust-2001%2Ffeatures_ayers1.jpg&hash=bc9360ffbb04642e419feed8ed6c9a29f9b9092b)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8)
That's exactly the image that came to mind when I saw the headline pic.
Libs just don't get it! :glare:
Obama hasn't saved anything. He's spent almost $6 trillion, with nothing to show for it. Saying that it would have been worse without this disaster of a president is bullshit.
Romney has turned around failing businesses, a failing olympics, and the failed democrat policies of a state.......turning a deficit into a surplus.
There isn't a choice here. Obama sucks and he's got to go.
Quote from: kramarat on November 01, 2012, 02:27:42 PM
Obama hasn't saved anything. He's spent almost $6 trillion, with nothing to show for it. Saying that it would have been worse without this disaster of a president is bullshit.
Romney has turned around failing businesses, a failing olympics, and the failed democrat policies of a state.......turning a deficit into a surplus.
There isn't a choice here. Obama sucks and he's got to go.
That's a statement at least, not just emotive drivel, so thanks.
Quote from: new_one on November 01, 2012, 03:26:08 PM
That's a statement at least, not just emotive drivel, so thanks.
What did you expect? Husein is going down in a landslide.
All because he has made the economy worse using Keynesian policy, and you expect us to debate a stupid opinion hit piece by a bunch of people that have no clue?
Quote from: Solar on November 01, 2012, 01:51:43 PM
Oh great, another Keynesian.
You know the ones Taxed, supply and demand. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
Don't you mean demand and supply? :tounge:
Quote from: CubaLibre on November 01, 2012, 05:14:34 PM
Don't you mean demand and supply? :tounge:
You missed him... he popped in here yesterday....
Quote from: new_one on November 01, 2012, 01:44:05 PM
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_ (http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21565623-america-could-do-better-barack-obama-sadly-mitt-romney-does-not-fit-bill-which-one?fsrc=scn/rd_ec/which_one_)
Opinions?
It reads like an Obama 2012 commercial. It's also full of lies. The one about Obama saving us from a depression is the most egregious. The economy emerged from recession in June, 2009, which was months before he stimulated us.
This is a biased article.
Does that answer your question?
Here is just one incident of Obama vs romney and it came out of one of the three debates between these two.
Obama was digging into Romney about the rich and asked him about his money overseas but Romney jumped on that one with both feet. Romney returned the question with a reply that questioned where Obama had his money and investments
and what were the returns of them.
Just more trying by Obama to take over the debates by maliaious schemes. Romney directs the rest of that part of the debate by informing Obama that he shouldn't be attacking him as part of his debate. Now, that was funny, don't care who you are.
Quote from: new_one on November 01, 2012, 03:26:08 PM
That's a statement at least, not just emotive drivel, so thanks.
Sure thing. Here are some more facts:
Romney became rich in the private sector. Obama used his political position to write and sell books. He became rich while he was
supposed to be doing the work of the people.
Obama is shutting down US coal plants, while allowing a massive increase in coal exports to China. This is a transfer of energy and jobs, not a battle against global warming.
Obama has imposed a moratorium on oil production in the Gulf, has cut permits on government land, and put a stop to the Keystone pipeline. At the same time, he sent $5 billion to Brazil for oil exploration and development. This is a transfer of energy and jobs, not a battle against global warming.
If we follow the money on Obama's stimulus, it leads, (in almost all cases), back to his supporters,donors, and bundlers. Not to any meaningful help for the country.
The Obama administration has been complicit in the murder of US citizens, first during "Fast and Furious", and now with Benghazi. Questions are met with lies, cover ups and the use of executive privilege. This is not the transparent administration that we were promised. It more closely resembles a criminal enterprise.
Quote from: taxed on November 01, 2012, 01:59:13 PM
Nothing makes a liberal warm and fuzzy like stepping on our flag:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chicagomag.com%2FChicago-Magazine%2FAugust-2001%2Ffeatures_ayers1.jpg&hash=bc9360ffbb04642e419feed8ed6c9a29f9b9092b)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJgWMI0hch8)
You know Taxed, i'm not a violent man but i'll sure like to throw dukes with Mr. Bill Ayers
This "endorsement" of Obama told me everything I needed to know with the "devil I know" crack. Ignoring Romneys experience in the private sector, as Governor and with the Olympic Committee as if it doesn't matter. Obama came in with virtually zero executive nor private sector experience and now, four years later we are led to believe he is the better choice? The debt, unemployment numbers and his inability to do anything but ratchet hate among fellow Americans tells me he may very well be the devil who needs to go.
Quote from: taxed on November 01, 2012, 05:16:03 PM
You missed him... he popped in here yesterday....
I always miss the good stuff. :cry:
Quote from: new_one on November 01, 2012, 03:26:08 PM
That's a statement at least, not just emotive drivel, so thanks.
Here are few links for you. Remember when Obama said he was going to clean up corporate corruption? He hired them and enriched them instead.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/venture-capitalists-play-key-role-in-obamas-energy-department/2011/12/30/gIQA05raER_story.html (http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/venture-capitalists-play-key-role-in-obamas-energy-department/2011/12/30/gIQA05raER_story.html)
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/01/its_mostly_wonks.html (http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2011/01/its_mostly_wonks.html)
http://prof77.wordpress.com/politics/an-updated-list-of-goldman-sachs-ties-to-the-obama-government-including-elena-kagan/ (http://prof77.wordpress.com/politics/an-updated-list-of-goldman-sachs-ties-to-the-obama-government-including-elena-kagan/)
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/us/politics/ties-to-obama-aided-in-access-for-exelon-corporation.html?pagewanted=all (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/us/politics/ties-to-obama-aided-in-access-for-exelon-corporation.html?pagewanted=all)
Fighting the war on poverty:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/welfare-skyrockets-under-obama-1-trillion-in-2011/ (http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2012/10/welfare-skyrockets-under-obama-1-trillion-in-2011/)
Yep. Even some on the left are aware of the deep corruption within this administration:
http://rt.com/usa/news/white-house-monsanto-peer-991/ (http://rt.com/usa/news/white-house-monsanto-peer-991/)