Some confusions

[kalash]

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/334646-im-confused-help-russia-clark/
"...Now, from what I've read about her, Clinton seems to be a serial warmonger and 'regime changer' whose actions in government caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people (including women and black people) and have undoubtedly made the world a more dangerous place.

Gary Leupp documented Mrs Clinton's foreign policy record in this 2015 article. Among Hillary's boasts are that she 'urged' her husband to bomb the Federal Republic Yugoslavia. The innocent civilians killed in the illegal 'humanitarian' bombing of Yugoslavia of 1999 which Clinton 'urged' included passengers on a train, staff at Serbian television and 73 Kosovan Albanians in a convoy - an attack that NATO had attempted to blame on Yugoslav forces.

Four years later, Hillary sided with hard-right Republican Party hawks and supported the illegal invasion of Iraq.

Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa. But in 2011 Clinton, now Secretary of State, helped destroy all that and turn Libya into a failed state and a base for IS. You don't have to a cheerleader for Muammar Gaddafi to condemn the brutal way he was murdered, but Clinton thought it was all rather funny. "We came. We saw. He died!"

Last week on George Galloway's Sputnik show on RT, the Green Party's Dr Jill Stein told us 'Hillary Clinton never found a war she didn't support'.

How does Clinton's record make her 'progressive'? Or has the word 'progressive' today been redefined to mean 'an enthusiastic for war whose campaign is bankrolled by Wall Street
and the hedge-fund billionaire George Soros.

I'm confused. Can anyone help me?..."

[quiller]

Close your eyes, count to ten and clear your mind. Reopen them and now say out loud:

"Follow the money."

[je_freedom]

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/334646-im-confused-help-russia-clark/
"...Now, from what I've read about her, Clinton seems to be a serial warmonger and 'regime changer' whose actions in government caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people (including women and black people) and have undoubtedly made the world a more dangerous place.

Gary Leupp documented Mrs Clinton's foreign policy record in this 2015 article. Among Hillary's boasts are that she 'urged' her husband to bomb the Federal Republic Yugoslavia. The innocent civilians killed in the illegal 'humanitarian' bombing of Yugoslavia of 1999 which Clinton 'urged' included passengers on a train, staff at Serbian television and 73 Kosovan Albanians in a convoy - an attack that NATO had attempted to blame on Yugoslav forces.

Four years later, Hillary sided with hard-right Republican Party hawks and supported the illegal invasion of Iraq.

Libya had the highest standard of living in Africa. But in 2011 Clinton, now Secretary of State, helped destroy all that and turn Libya into a failed state and a base for IS. You don't have to a cheerleader for Muammar Gaddafi to condemn the brutal way he was murdered, but Clinton thought it was all rather funny. "We came. We saw. He died!"

Last week on George Galloway's Sputnik show on RT, the Green Party's Dr Jill Stein told us 'Hillary Clinton never found a war she didn't support'.

How does Clinton's record make her 'progressive'? Or has the word 'progressive' today been redefined to mean 'an enthusiastic for war whose campaign is bankrolled by Wall Street
and the hedge-fund billionaire George Soros.

I'm confused. Can anyone help me?..."

"Progressive" means the same thing now
as it has since Woodrow Wilson.

[kit saginaw]

She just verbalized she's a progressive.  She's pandering...

" A sand-worm dreaming of power. "  -1001 Arabian Nights

Just clear your mind and look at her kid... suddenly performing with the Washington Ballet in 1997.  No sacrifices, no tribulations, no talent honed with hard work.

Accepted at Stanford University, which is almost impossible.  -Yet misses-out on the technology-boom which was happening all around her at the time.  Then is miraculously accepted at Oxford University for a degree in 'international affairs', whatever that means.

But:  "I woke up and thought, Wow, I love this. Do I want to do a PhD? And then I realized, I'm going to be 27 and know a whole lot about one thing. So I did what everyone I knew was doing when they didn't know what the right professional answer was for them and applied to different consulting firms. I thought that might help sort out if I wanted to have a professional track in health and public health, or an academic track, or something else altogether."

-Getting the picture about her mother's progressivism?

 

[Cali Contrarian]

No, I'm the one who's confused. I'm confused about why it's OK for Kalash to be a Kremlin troll and nobody says anything about it, because he slyly couches it to make it look like an attack on a discredited liberal American politician.

[quiller]

No, I'm the one who's confused. I'm confused about why it's OK for Kalash to be a Kremlin troll and nobody says anything about it, because he slyly couches it to make it look like an attack on a discredited liberal American politician.

Now prove your case.

[Cali Contrarian]

Now prove your case.

Or you could just backtrack and find out that every thread he's ever started is a pro-Russian talking point, or that he cites RT as his source on a regular basis. But that would require actual effort, wouldn't it? Not a good fit to your bailiwick of cheap insults and the ever-facinating jpeg rolodex.

[quiller]

Or you could just backtrack and find out that every thread he's ever started is a pro-Russian talking point, or that he cites RT as his source on a regular basis. But that would require actual effort, wouldn't it? Not a good fit to your bailiwick of cheap insults and the ever-facinating jpeg rolodex.

I refuse to do your homework for you, Clyde. PROVE YOUR CASE.

[Cali Contrarian]

I refuse to do your homework for you, Clyde. PROVE YOUR CASE.

I refuse to do your bidding. Goodbye.

[quiller]

One of my Unprovoked Outbreaks of the Truth™ here is that Moderate Republican here is saying the management here is allowing posts from pro-Russian sources. He just hasn't got the stones to stand up and say it directly.

[quiller]

I refuse to do your bidding. Goodbye.

Yet it was your claim! My, what exquisitely bad thinking on your part, saying it without thinking!

Is this site so terrible that you must flee when challenged? Shall we hire a choir to see you off, on the S.S. Pity Party?

[Cryptic Bert]

I figured no one knows what the hell he's talking about.

[walkstall]

I figured no one knows what the hell he's talking about.

[Solar]

I figured no one knows what the hell he's talking about.

Yep. To be honest, I was too lazy to read this shit, which it usually is, with a hidden agenda, one too meaningless, about a one time Sooper Power that collapsed on on itself.
A subject most people could care less about.....

[Cryptic Bert]

Yep. To be honest, I was too lazy to read this shit, which it usually is, with a hidden agenda, one too meaningless, about a one time Sooper Power that collapsed on on itself.
A subject most people could care less about.....

If we have to have a weird Russian why can't it be Rytis?