Should The Tea Party Split From The Republicans and form their own party?

[TeeMan]

Your on and I have not moved you to The Pit yet.

Thats only because I keep flattering you.   bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

[walkstall]

Thats only because I keep flattering you.   bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    You haven't even laid a glove on me Shill!   

[Solar]

Now you must be trying to convince me you are a dumbass--first of all.....'Irregardless'........is a woid.

Not only is "irregardless" a word, but it's probably the best word of all time. Here's why.

"Irregardless" is a word. It is, at least according to Merriam-Webster and Scrabble.

But I'm not going to stop there. No. I would also like to contend that "irregardless" is the baddest-ass word of all time. This is for several reasons, which I will now explain.


1.It's the only word where attaching the "ir-" prefix to the root word has the exact same meaning as the root word: Throwing an "ir-" in front of normal, less bad-ass words that begin with "R" changes the meaning to the opposite of the word. Irrefutable. Irreverent. Irrelevant. Irresponsible. Not "irregardless." It doesn't care what the rules of grammar are. It means exactly the same thing as "regardless," and that's the way it likes it.


2.Against all odds, against all logic, and (ir)regardless of everyone hating it, it has achieved official word status: How can you not pull for the underdog in this case? "Irregardless" went up against the rules of grammar, stick-by-the-book lexicographers, and the fact that it's a completely redundant word. Didn't matter. Whatever didn't kill it made it stronger. It's the hardest-working word in the dictionary, and it should have earned your respect by now.


3.Even though it's a word, Merriam-Webster says you shouldn't use it: Can you name another word in the dictionary that the dictionary says you shouldn't use? Even really bad swear words don't have a dictionary-imposed boycott. That just makes me want to use it more.


4.It simultaneously makes sense and doesn't make sense: You can think of the word in one of two ways: (1) it should mean the opposite of "regardless," or something along the lines of "keeping the facts in regard," or (2) it could mean "regardless of the fact that something is regardless." The latter of the two is like double-super regardless, and it's the meaning I prefer. "Irregardless" really, really doesn't care what the facts are or what you think. It should only be used in extreme circumstances, such as when a course of action is ridiculously counterintuitive. "Irregardless of the fact that you are very thirsty, you should eat this pile of salt." Stuff like that.


5.It practices what it preaches: Irregardless of the rules of grammar, "irregardless" is a word. It's self-reflexive. It's the exception that proves the rule. It talks the talk and walks the walk. Is there another word like that? No, because "irregardless" is bad-ass. It is a text-based Chuck Norris, roundhouse-kicking everything else in the dictionary into submission....TimMonihyan


Now in regards...to and I quote   "it's not "rich people" who think the government is taxing and spending too much.  It's anyone who is not a criminal who advocates the forced confiscation and redistribution of money from people who earned it to people who didn't.  You are supporting the forces of evil."


Nevertheless.....for the government to function someone must pay taxes....and guess what who has the best ability to pay taxes? 

Jesus said:  "Render unto Caesar the things that are Ceasar's"  ....but of course no one likes to have to pay taxes...and no earthly government is perfect nor will they ever be.

It is not the taxing and spending that is so bad in America.....it is what and who they are spending it on. 

I agree that it is unfair...taxing one class more than others....but life is not fair and nothing anyone ever does will make it fair.

In a nutshell....most voters...aka the overwhelming numbers of voters are not rich thus...to try and win an election with the slogan of "smaller government and lower taxes is not a winning formula"  and that seems to be a point too many...maybe the majority of tea partiers cannot get beyond."

Now of course they have every right to want that, to pursue it and lobby for it but to fail to understand they will never win a Presidential election with that slogan is pathetic.

Now basically I am talking to republicans....as a libertarian you are irrlevant in regards to being a factor in the next election.

However, any one who has any hopes whatever for a  fair tax system should definitely stay away from the democratic party.

In other words, in the world of politics one must learn the art of compromise.  What it comes down to  is the reality that any party that champions the minorities and the poor will be motivated to distrubute more tax money to those groups and take more from your group.  So anyone who wants to keep more of their money should advocate for the most conservative party possible.

Now what the elitist republicans fail to comprehend is that there are many factions in the republican party but the largest faction and the one that has the key to a republican victory is the White Working Class.

In order to win that crucial vote they must learn who they are and what they want.

If you're going to quote other peoples bull shit, then post a link.
But REGARDLESS, you're still an idiot! using a double negative is the epitome of illiterate.
What you are saying when you say "irregardless" is "without without regard".
Now stop wasting our time and grow up!

[Cryptic Bert]

If you're going to quote other peoples bull shit, then post a link.
But REGARDLESS, you're still an idiot! using a double negative is the epitome of illiterate.
What you are saying when you say "irregardless" is "without without regard".
Now stop wasting our time and grow up!

Everyone sing it with me!

Bang, bang, Solar's silver hammer
Came down upon her head
Bang, bang, Solar's silver hammer
Made sure that she was dead

[Solar]

Everyone sing it with me!

Bang, bang, Solar's silver hammer
Came down upon her head
Bang, bang, Solar's silver hammer
Made sure that she was dead

You know I can tolerate ignorance, because ignorance is curable, stupidity on the other hand, is forever.
He appears to be at that impetuous age of early 20s. He needs to slow down and listen.

[Cryptic Bert]

You know I can tolerate ignorance, because ignorance is curable, stupidity on the other hand, is forever.
He appears to be at that impetuous age of early 20s. He needs to slow down and listen.

It would be easier to just drop a 8500 pound version of the constitution on him. Then plant some daisies around him.

[Kaz]

Now in regards...to and I quote   "it's not "rich people" who think the government is taxing and spending too much.  It's anyone who is not a criminal who advocates the forced confiscation and redistribution of money from people who earned it to people who didn't.  You are supporting the forces of evil."


Nevertheless.....for the government to function someone must pay taxes....and guess what who has the best ability to pay taxes? 

Jesus said:  "Render unto Caesar the things that are Ceasar's"  ....but of course no one likes to have to pay taxes...and no earthly government is perfect nor will they ever be.

Irregardless is only a word in the sense that "aint" is a word.  I hope you don't use it at work, taxpayers don't need another welfare recipient on our backs.

As for the quote, LOL.  Your content lite posts are amusing.  I didn't say "taxes" are stealing, I said confiscation and redistribution is.  That's welfare man!   

Also, I love how the left try to use Jesus to justify socialism.   Jesus did not say ever anywhere that charity is the job of government to do with forcibly confiscated money.  You can look it up.  He said it is for ... you ... to do it ... voluntarily ... with your own money.

Whenever it seems like liberals look as clueless as you can possibly look, you double down and start quoting Jesus.  You're a gas, man, keep up the good work!  LOL.  That's funny.

[quiller]

Yes you are. And everyone knows it and mocks you.

He'd better have some sharp crayons to fight back. Some of us internet bullies leave welts on youngsters like this.

[quiller]

I have responded to their personal attacks...some like to dish it out but can't take it.

You were saying, Cupcake?

[walkstall]

I have responded to their personal attacks...some like to dish it out but can't take it.

I said I like your youtube cartoons.  I sit and watch them with my grandkids also. 

[TeeMan]

He'd better have some sharp crayons to fight back. Some of us internet bullies leave welts on youngsters like this.

Talk is cheap!   chump....put up or shut up.

[Solar]

Talk is cheap!   chump....put up or shut up.

Let me guess. You're in your early 20s, right?

[walkstall]

Let me guess. You're in your early 20s, right?

We have been looking at Cartoon together. 

[TeeMan]

Irregardless is only a word in the sense that "aint" is a word.  I hope you don't use it at work, taxpayers don't need another welfare recipient on our backs.

As for the quote, LOL.  Your content lite posts are amusing.  I didn't say "taxes" are stealing, I said confiscation and redistribution is.  That's welfare man!   

Also, I love how the left try to use Jesus to justify socialism.   Jesus did not say ever anywhere that charity is the job of government to do with forcibly confiscated money.  You can look it up.  He said it is for ... you ... to do it ... voluntarily ... with your own money.

Whenever it seems like liberals look as clueless as you can possibly look, you double down and start quoting Jesus.  You're a gas, man, keep up the good work!  LOL.  That's funny.

Your posts are so discombotulated(is that a woid? if not tell it to the marines)....as in I don't know if you just want to coinfuse the issue or you really are that coinfused.

Anyone who can read my writings even just the ones that have not been deleted and still claim I am a socialist is either serious retarded or a propagandist aka putting out red herrings to try and protect this board from the truth.

Anyhow, just for the record I quoted Jesus not to justify socialism but to show the legitimatcy of government and their right to tax.

I do agree with you on charity....and again that was in my post on what a true conservative is....ask solar why it was deleted. 

This will be my last day on here....in fact this may be my last post...solar is set to pull the switch but even if he doesn't I am leaving....i prefer a bigger pond...i post on another board where i get over a thousand hits in one day.

So if you have anything else to say...best make it quick.

[TeeMan]

I said I like your youtube cartoons.  I sit and watch them with my grandkids also.

Life is not a cartoon pal....life is a beach...heh heh   Which is where I am headed right now.  byeeeeeeeeeeeeee