presidential race

[supsalemgr]

Not really, compared to Sanders, Clinton is pretty moderate.   

Sanders is to Cruz as Clinton is to Jeb

I respectfully disagree. Clinton is just as far left as Sanders, but she won't tell us that.

[gandb77]

OK, the first time you spewed your idiocy I assumed you were taking a break from lucidity.
But to actually repeat something so ignorant after having been given the results of the last two midterms, kind of screams dare I say, "Stupid"?

Here's how it's going to play out, Hitlery will be the chosen one because the Dim party quelled any chance of a left wing TEA movement starting, but the GOP'e exposed their hatred for the base/TEA, called us all kinds of names, as well as the enemy, essentially cementing their demise and despite their attempts to suppress, even after helping the Marxist use the IRS against us, we flat out told the crony socialists to take their Jeb and shove it up their ass.

If you had any sense whatsoever, you'd see that in the end Cruz will prevail, that the nation had it's fill of politics as usual, and that's why the Dim party has been on life support since Hussein's second anointing.

I guess that anyone that disagrees with you is STUPID.   Much as your WISHFUL THINKING prefers Cruz, in the end the party insiders will place Bush in the final. 
How far did the Tea Party get with choosing the Speaker of the House???

[Solar]

I guess that anyone that disagrees with you is STUPID.   Much as your WISHFUL THINKING prefers Cruz, in the end the party insiders will place Bush in the final. 
How far did the Tea Party get with choosing the Speaker of the House???

TEA didn't have candidates running in all that many races, check your stats, furthermore, TEA has taken more than 1000 Legislative seats from the Dims across the country.
Now with that in mind, how is the Establishment going to find the votes to elect Jebby, show me your magical stats.
Yeah, Clinton is a given, I explained that at the beginning of summer, that she would take the fall for the party's loss, so as to protect Marxist ideals, that her troubles is what lost the election, and not leftist policy.

I've given you solid evidence since last year as to why a Conservative will seize 2016, and in this case the base wants a Constitutionalist, and what did you give to support your theory?
" final analysis it will be a Bush - Clinton race."....
Really, and what I wrote is stupid?

[gandb77]

TEA didn't have candidates running in all that many races, check your stats, furthermore, TEA has taken more than 1000 Legislative seats from the Dims across the country.
Now with that in mind, how is the Establishment going to find the votes to elect Jebby, show me your magical stats.
Yeah, Clinton is a given, I explained that at the beginning of summer, that she would take the fall for the party's loss, so as to protect Marxist ideals, that her troubles is what lost the election, and not leftist policy.

I've given you solid evidence since last year as to why a Conservative will seize 2016, and in this case the base wants a Constitutionalist, and what did you give to support your theory?
" final analysis it will be a Bush - Clinton race."....
Really, and what I wrote is stupid?

Actually I do support the TEA party but I am also realistic. Unlike you, I can see what is realistic and not colored by my wishful thinking.
If only wishing it were true, it would be great and we would not have Ryan as speaker. But, power being what it is, the party powerful will prevail and Jeb will be their candidate.
When the TEA party allowed itself to be incorporated into the republican party it was the end of TEA party effectiveness.

[kit saginaw]

Actually I do support the TEA party but I am also realistic. Unlike you, I can see what is realistic and not colored by my wishful thinking.
If only wishing it were true, it would be great and we would not have Ryan as speaker. But, power being what it is, the party powerful will prevail and Jeb will be their candidate.
When the TEA party allowed itself to be incorporated into the republican party it was the end of TEA party effectiveness.

Those are unrealistic assessments.  Also unrealistic is starting a new thread called 'presidential race', then simply stating it'll be Bush vs. Clinton. 

Reanimate one of the dozens of previous threads and type-in your opinion.  The subject has been exhaustively debated already.

And since you haven't gotten the memo, the TEA Party isn't a 'Party'.  It's a philosophy based on Conservative and traditional principles. 

[Solar]

Actually I do support the TEA party but I am also realistic. Unlike you, I can see what is realistic and not colored by my wishful thinking.
If only wishing it were true, it would be great and we would not have Ryan as speaker. But, power being what it is, the party powerful will prevail and Jeb will be their candidate.
When the TEA party allowed itself to be incorporated into the republican party it was the end of TEA party effectiveness.

Wrong! Mine is not simply wishful optimism, mine as proven is based in reality and backed up with fact.
Yours on the other hand bleeds pessimism and falsities.
Take your claim that the GOP usurped TEA, that is the dumbest thing you've posted to date, with the exception of this OP.
TEA was not taken over by the GOP, in fact it's the obverse, TEA is stealing the GOP from the Establishment, and as Kit pointed out, TEA is not a party, it's an ideology, and there is absolutely no way anyone or anything can usurp beliefs, it's an complete impossibility.

As to your claim you back TEA? Bull Shit! You don't even understand the movement, so there is no way you could possibly claim support status.

[Solar]

Those are unrealistic assessments.  Also unrealistic is starting a new thread called 'presidential race', then simply stating it'll be Bush vs. Clinton. 

Reanimate one of the dozens of previous threads and type-in your opinion.  The subject has been exhaustively debated already.

And since you haven't gotten the memo, the TEA Party isn't a 'Party'.  It's a philosophy based on Conservative and traditional principles.

Trolls tend to have a habit of stepping in it when they don't understand the subject matter.

[gandb77]

Wrong! Mine is not simply wishful optimism, mine as proven is based in reality and backed up with fact.
Yours on the other hand bleeds pessimism and falsities.
Take your claim that the GOP usurped TEA, that is the dumbest thing you've posted to date, with the exception of this OP.
TEA was not taken over by the GOP, in fact it's the obverse, TEA is stealing the GOP from the Establishment, and as Kit pointed out, TEA is not a party, it's an ideology, and there is absolutely no way anyone or anything can usurp beliefs, it's an complete impossibility.

As to your claim you back TEA? Bull Shit! You don't even understand the movement, so there is no way you could possibly claim support status.

So, the TEA PARTY    isn.t a PARTY.  Thats real good thinking.
All I can say is watch the results of the presidential race.   Who is this TEA Parties philosophies candidate of choice??
Or, Do you know?

[walkstall]

So, the TEA PARTY    isn.t a PARTY.  Thats real good thinking.
All I can say is watch the results of the presidential race.   Who is this TEA Parties philosophies candidate of choice??
Or, Do you know?

By the way, what is a troll??   

[Solar]

So, the TEA PARTY    isn.t a PARTY.  Thats real good thinking.

NO! TEA is not a party, it's a belief in a set principals.
Now, please tell me why in your mind that's a problem. This should be interesting.

All I can say is watch the results of the presidential race.   Who is this TEA Parties philosophies candidate of choice??
Or, Do you know?

Jeez, pay attention! It's Cruz for Christs sake! The same guy that WILL be the next POTUS.

[supsalemgr]

NO! TEA is not a party, it's a belief in a set principals.
Now, please tell me why in your mind that's a problem. This should be interesting.

Jeez, pay attention! It's Cruz for Christs sake! The same guy that WILL be the next POTUS.

gandb77 definitely does not comprehend what TEA is. He is still looking for the TEA Party.

[quiller]

What is a troll?

[Solar]

gandb77 definitely does not comprehend what TEA is. He is still looking for the TEA Party.

Yeah. I'm guessing recent lib convert, or kid, or even both, but most likely one that realized the Dims lied and he won't be suckered again, so he looked toward the LIBertarian movement as an alternative.

[gandb77]

Yeah. I'm guessing recent lib convert, or kid, or even both, but most likely one that realized the Dims lied and he won't be suckered again, so he looked toward the LIBertarian movement as an alternative.

Kid of 83.  lifelong republican and Reagan conservative.
Just don,t like this running down and ridiculing anyone that disagrees with you folks.
maybe you should stop trying to run a closed shop and give honest disageements, honest  answers

[quiller]

Kid of 83.  lifelong republican and Reagan conservative.
Just don,t like this running down and ridiculing anyone that disagrees with you folks.
maybe you should stop trying to run a closed shop and give honest disageements, honest  answers

A true "closed shop" is Democratic Underground or the odious children at The Daily Kos. There, a single conservative posting is often enough to get someone banned INSTANTLY. Liberals are liars if they say they allow freedom of speech. You have mistaken this site for their tactics.

"Running down and ridiculing" is also subject to some debate. I feel lately I haven't been doing enough of it with the brazen vile trash now in our White House, sending advance warning to enemy combatants before starting the bombing. (Drop that fool into that same zone and watch him reevaluate!)