A California city removed its Black Lives Matter mural

Started by Sick Of Silence, July 20, 2020, 10:10:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sick Of Silence

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-california-city-removed-its-black-lives-matter-mural-in-the-middle-of-the-night-after-a-trump-supporter-asked-to-paint-maga-2020-on-the-same-street/ar-BB16XWJ7

QuoteRedwood City, California, last week removed a Black Lives Matter mural that had been painted by a city resident as part of an Independence Day public art celebration, CBS San Francisco reported.

The mural was removed after a local lawyer said she should be able to paint a "MAGA 2020" mural on the same street.

Officials said it was removed as a potential traffic hazard.

Redwood City resident Dan Pease, who painted the mural, said he expected it would remain until it organically washed away.

If it was a traffic hazard, why was it allowed in the first place?

Other than that, WINNING!

PS: everybody has their marching orders: use lawyers against the city.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street I'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.
This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.
How come nobody was interested in educating people about these rights until online videos got monetization?