Quote from: Solar on October 21, 2013, 04:54:27 AM
Gee, if it's such a great idea, lets apply it to interstate trade, where one state is suffering because another state is out producing them.
Like sat Texas, because they have a source of cheap labor and Idaho has no access to this labor mkt, so Texas would have to pay an IC tax.
But wait, that means Idaho will as well, but wait, that means the employer will have to pay more per employee, oh but wait, they can pass it along to the end consumer.

WOW What a great idea, the consumer winds up paying another tax with absolutely ZERO benefit.

Solar, concerning your posted reply #252, refer to the reply entitled
" Financial / Economic competition between political jurisdictions. ",
which is reply #151 on: August 23, 2013, 06:36:50 AM of this discussion thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Supposn on December 03, 2013, 09:11:41 PM
Solar, concerning your posted reply #252, refer to the reply entitled
" Financial / Economic competition between political jurisdictions. ",
which is reply #151 on: August 23, 2013, 06:36:50 AM of this discussion thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Why, can't you answer my question without some convoluted post?

Quote from: Supposn on December 03, 2013, 09:11:41 PM
Solar, concerning your posted reply #252, refer to the reply entitled
" Financial / Economic competition between political jurisdictions. ",
which is reply #151 on: August 23, 2013, 06:36:50 AM of this discussion thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Solar on December 04, 2013, 11:00:57 AM
Why, can't you answer my question without some convoluted post?

Solar, I sympathize with your confusion.  You're unable to accept and unable to provide a logical argument to refute reply #151 of this thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Supposn on December 05, 2013, 02:26:14 PM
Quote from: Supposn on December 03, 2013, 09:11:41 PM
Solar, concerning your posted reply #252, refer to the reply entitled
" Financial / Economic competition between political jurisdictions. ",
which is reply #151 on: August 23, 2013, 06:36:50 AM of this discussion thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Solar, I sympathize with your confusion.  You're unable to accept and unable to provide a logical argument to refute reply #151 of this thread.

Respectfully, Supposn

Well that explains why in the Hell I couldn't find your thread by the named:
"Economic competition between political jurisdictions"
One doesn't exist.

If there is something you think makes your point, copy and paste it, I'm not doing your work for you, aside the fact most of your points are either extremely vague or make no sense whatsoever.

Quote from: Solar on December 05, 2013, 03:34:02 PM
Well that explains why in the Hell I couldn't find your thread by the named:
"Economic competition between political jurisdictions"
One doesn't exist.

If there is something you think makes your point, copy and paste it, I'm not doing your work for you, aside the fact most of your points are either extremely vague or make no sense whatsoever.

Economic competition between political jurisdictions; (i.e. between the states).


Solar, reply #151 is a transcript of my reply to Mountainshield's tread entitled "Norway and the European Common Market".

My reply to Mountainshield was affirming Vat's method of sales tax administration because it better enables international trade across all political boundaries regardless of their internal taxing rates or policies.
It also alludes to the economic competition between political jurisdictions.
[Import Certificates are a proposed remedy for annual trade deficits are ALWAYS being an economic detriments' to their nations.   Reply #151 alluded that economic competition no less exists is between states as it does between nations].

To bind our United State together the drafters of the U.S. Constitution requires the states to subordinate whatever they believe is their economic self interest to the supreme federal jurisdiction over interstate and international commerce.

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Supposn on December 05, 2013, 08:10:24 PM


My reply to Mountainshield was affirming Vat's method of sales tax administration because it better enables international trade across all political boundaries regardless of their internal taxing rates or policies.

Prove it!!!

Quote from: Supposn on December 05, 2013, 08:10:24 PM
Economic competition between political jurisdictions; (i.e. between the states).


Solar, ... My reply to Mountainshield was affirming Vat's method of sales tax administration because it better enables international trade across all political boundaries regardless of their internal taxing rates or policies. ...

Refer to reply #48 of:
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/financial/value-added-tax-(i-e-vat)/msg153676/#msg153676 .

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Supposn on December 06, 2013, 09:46:34 AM
Refer to reply #48 of:
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/financial/value-added-tax-(i-e-vat)/msg153676/#msg153676 .

Respectfully, Supposn

Wrong! If you want to explain something, post it here, I have enough to do here, other than searching out and trying to decipher your point from another convoluted post.

Quote from: Supposn on December 06, 2013, 09:46:34 AM
Refer to reply #48 of:
http://conservativepoliticalforum.com/financial/value-added-tax-(i-e-vat)/msg153676/#msg153676 .

Respectfully, Supposn

One more person that has a problem with not using the quote function!

Quote from: Solar on December 06, 2013, 10:04:40 AM
Wrong! If you want to explain something, post it here, I have enough to do here, other than searching out and trying to decipher your point from another convoluted post.

Solar, I refer to links in order not to divert to remain on topic rather than moving to other sub-topics.  I try to respect the CPF group.  I understand that you're not challenged by my referral links but you assume them to be unworthy of your consideration.

I understand that your respect and/or your assessment of the opinions of others need not be mutually equitable.  I do not take it personally and do have a need to "preach to the quire".

Respectfully, Supposn

Quote from: Supposn on December 10, 2013, 09:58:26 PM
Solar, I refer to links in order not to divert to remain on topic rather than moving to other sub-topics.  I try to respect the CPF group.  I understand that you're not challenged by my referral links but you assume them to be unworthy of your consideration.

I understand that your respect and/or your assessment of the opinions of others need not be mutually equitable.  I do not take it personally and do have a need to "preach to the quire".

Respectfully, Supposn

It's CHOIR, dolt.

Quote from: Supposn on December 10, 2013, 09:58:26 PM
Solar, I refer to links in order not to divert to remain on topic rather than moving to other sub-topics.  I try to respect the CPF group.  I understand that you're not challenged by my referral links but you assume them to be unworthy of your consideration.

I understand that your respect and/or your assessment of the opinions of others need not be mutually equitable.  I do not take it personally and do have a need to "preach to the quire".

Respectfully, Supposn

If you understand the forum so well, then you would know you don't use links to make your point, you post your point and own it, that's how this forum works, get it?

Now, if you have something you feel is important to your claim, then copy and paste it in your response, but don't expect anyone here to do your work for you by chasing down links.
This is not a request, understand?

Trade deficits and stolen foreign jobs is really used as nothing more than ad captandum hysteria. The "exporting" of jobs leads to, simply, cheaper goods. Technological innovation often removes jobs from the economy and drastically increases productivity.
Trade unions tried to ban the automobile because it killed buggy/carriage jobs. This purely emotional sentiment regarding former American industry is just resisting technological and economic evolution. The exporting of jobs increases American productivity and further relieves price burdens from consumers.

Quote from: Elephant In The Room on December 21, 2013, 05:54:59 PM
Trade deficits and stolen foreign jobs is really used as nothing more than ad captandum hysteria. The "exporting" of jobs leads to, simply, cheaper goods. Technological innovation often removes jobs from the economy and drastically increases productivity.
Trade unions tried to ban the automobile because it killed buggy/carriage jobs. This purely emotional sentiment regarding former American industry is just resisting technological and economic evolution. The exporting of jobs increases American productivity and further relieves price burdens from consumers.

If I remember right you also said that on another forum, although it has been some time.

Quote from: walkstall on December 21, 2013, 06:00:08 PM
If I remember right you also said that on another forum, although it has been some time.

Is he an LNF escapee?