Who wants a huge laugh at the expense of Joe Biden's crack attorneys argument against the 2nd Amendment in State of New York..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Biden's attorneys are arguing in the year 1285 AD England's arms laws were stricter than New York gun laws, therefore, New York guns laws should stay in place and not be overturned viva the SCOTUS because the NY guns laws are not as strick as 1285 AD England's arms laws...... :lol: :lol: :lol:
The Biden Administration's Laughable 2nd Amendment Arguments To The Supreme Court
On Nov. 3, exactly one year from last year's presidential election, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on a landmark Second Amendment case challenging New York's century-old law making it next-to impossible for the average citizen to obtain a permit to lawfully possess a handgun outside their home.
To no one's real surprise, the Biden administration last week filed a brief urging the High Court to dismiss the challenge to New York's restrictive handgun law. What is interesting are the absurd, bordering on laughable, arguments the Biden Department of Justice makes in support of its position.
If one were to take the administration's legal brief as historically correct, one would conclude that the United States is a nation founded on firearms restrictions rather than firearms freedom. Moreover, the Justice Department lawyers declare that New York's highly prohibitory handgun permitting law is "most modest"!
READ MORE HERE and have a laugh
https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/27/barr-biden-administration-laughable-2nd-amendment-arguments-supreme-court/
Quote from: Bronx on September 27, 2021, 12:30:52 PMWho wants a huge laugh at the expense of Joe Biden's crack attorneys argument against the 2nd Amendment in State of New York..... :lol: :lol: :lol:
Biden's attorneys are arguing in the year 1285 AD England's arms laws were stricter than New York gun laws, therefore, New York guns laws should stay in place and not be overturned viva the SCOTUS because the NY guns laws are not as strick as 1285 AD England's arms laws...... :lol: :lol: :lol:
The Biden Administration's Laughable 2nd Amendment Arguments To The Supreme Court
On Nov. 3, exactly one year from last year's presidential election, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments on a landmark Second Amendment case challenging New York's century-old law making it next-to impossible for the average citizen to obtain a permit to lawfully possess a handgun outside their home.
To no one's real surprise, the Biden administration last week filed a brief urging the High Court to dismiss the challenge to New York's restrictive handgun law. What is interesting are the absurd, bordering on laughable, arguments the Biden Department of Justice makes in support of its position.
If one were to take the administration's legal brief as historically correct, one would conclude that the United States is a nation founded on firearms restrictions rather than firearms freedom. Moreover, the Justice Department lawyers declare that New York's highly prohibitory handgun permitting law is "most modest"!
READ MORE HERE and have a laugh
https://dailycaller.com/2021/09/27/barr-biden-administration-laughable-2nd-amendment-arguments-supreme-court/
Looks like their game plan is to insult the intelligence of the court. Wonder how that is going to work for them.
Biden and his handlers are idiots. Anyone that supports his administration is a traitor.
Quote(5) It is likewise commanded that every man have in his house arms for keeping the peace in accordance with the ancient assize; namely that every man between fifteen years and sixty be assessed and sworn to arms according to the amount of his lands and, of his chattels; that is to say,
https://thehistoryofengland.co.uk/resource/statute-of-winchester-1285/