Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 11:07:31 AMNo, you raise the question, legally, before the election.  If you raise it after the election, then you're setting up a scenario where you're invalidating legit votes.

Huh? Why are you replying to me? I simply saw the idiocy of your reply.      

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 11:07:31 AMNo, you raise the question, legally, before the election.  If you raise it after the election, then you're setting up a scenario where you're invalidating legit votes.

Cheating at any event in time is still cheating! Do you get that?

Quote from: Solar on July 17, 2021, 11:21:24 AMCheating at any event in time is still cheating! Do you get that?

The method of collecting ballots doesn't make the ballots themselves fraudulent. 100% of the people who used the tents, that Vernon referred to, going be legally registered voters, using legal ballots to cast their vote.

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 11:41:30 AMThe method of collecting ballots doesn't make the ballots themselves fraudulent. 100% of the people who used the tents, that Vernon referred to, going be legally registered voters, using legal ballots to cast their vote.

Yes! It does, because anyone who was going to vote, already had!
I dare you to find one that was valid after the date to prove your claim!

Quote from: Solar on July 17, 2021, 11:21:24 AMCheating at any event in time is still cheating! Do you get that?

Just think if the 4 horsemen were posting today on this board like the old days.       

I do miss the other two.

Quote from: Solar on July 17, 2021, 12:31:40 PMYes! It does, because anyone who was going to vote, already had!
I dare you to find one that was valid after the date to prove your claim!

I honestly don't know what you're saying kr asking for here.

Considering how smart you have claimed to be elsewhere, playing dumb here is pathetic.

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 12:46:24 PMI honestly don't know what you're saying kr asking for here.

Quote from: winterset on July 17, 2021, 01:35:25 PMConsidering how smart you have claimed to be elsewhere, playing dumb here is pathetic.

Don't think he is playing. He has been given too many resources which  explains everything and he still does not get it.

Quote from: Solar on July 17, 2021, 12:31:40 PMYes! It does, because anyone who was going to vote, already had!
I dare you to find one that was valid after the date to prove your claim!

I think we are talking about two different things. Vernon mentioned something about tents for a balance are collected. How's your job relate to what you're talking about?

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 04:55:42 PMI think we are talking about two different things. Vernon mentioned something about tents for a balance are collected. How's your job relate to what you're talking about?

I need a transcript, my hearing isn't what it used to be, so I couldn't hear 80% of what was said, too much echo.

Quote from: Solar on July 17, 2021, 07:52:30 PMI need a transcript, my hearing isn't what it used to be, so I couldn't hear 80% of what was said, too much echo.

Then why'd you respond?

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 10:39:02 PMThen why'd you respond?

Why in the fuck did you even ask me in the first place? I'm getting really bored with your nonsense and you inability for basic debate and lack of intellectual curiosity.
You swallow all the lies and parrot their shit as if there is but only one truth.

If you believe Vernon is wrong, then fuckin prove it and quit wasting our time!

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 17, 2021, 11:07:31 AMNo, you raise the question, legally, before the election.  If you raise it after the election, then you're setting up a scenario where you're invalidating legit votes.

No you arent. They were never legit if the law was broken. Thats on the dems who broke the law. A person doesnt need to know they are breaking the law to be breaking the law, nor does there need to be intent.

And you cannot bring a suit before the election because you dont have standing.

Thats what happened here, the judges said basically, "no you cant bring it before the election because you dont have standing and no you cant bring it after the election because its too late." Thats how they abused the system to allow cheating.

Yet you keep trying desperately to find any loophole to allow for the MSMs narrative to be maybe possibly the tiniest bit true.

Quote from: T Hunt on July 18, 2021, 06:26:03 AMNo you arent. They were never legit if the law was broken. Thats on the dems who broke the law. A person doesnt need to know they are breaking the law to be breaking the law, nor does there need to be intent.

And you cannot bring a suit before the election because you dont have standing.

Thats what happened here, the judges said basically, "no you cant bring it before the election because you dont have standing and no you cant bring it after the election because its too late. Thats how they abused the system to allow cheating.

Yet you keep trying desperately to find any loophole to allow for the MSMs narrative to be maybe possibly the tiniest bit true.

Spot ON!

Quote from: T Hunt on July 18, 2021, 06:26:03 AMNo you arent. They were never legit if the law was broken. Thats on the dems who broke the law. A person doesnt need to know they are breaking the law to be breaking the law, nor does there need to be intent.

And you cannot bring a suit before the election because you dont have standing.

Thats what happened here, the judges said basically, "no you cant bring it before the election because you dont have standing and no you cant bring it after the election because its too late." Thats how they abused the system to allow cheating.

Yet you keep trying desperately to find any loophole to allow for the MSMs narrative to be maybe possibly the tiniest bit true.

It wouldn't be the voter who was breaking the law. They are only voting in a manner that is required of them.

Where is the proof that a judge said that voter laws can't be questioned before the election?