Yes you heard that right! Hillary, of all people has a video out predicting decertification of the election in the near future.
She mentions a supreme court case coming up soon that I am unaware of.

https://truthsocial.com/users/nomandates/statuses/109226067948017484
Try the link above if it doesnt show up on here.

From Truth...

Not found

This resource could not be found

Quote from: Solar on October 24, 2022, 06:36:03 PMFrom Truth...

Not found

This resource could not be found

Even when you click on this link?

https://truthsocial.com/@nomandates/posts/109226067948017484

Quote from: T Hunt on October 24, 2022, 07:30:46 PMEven when you click on this link?

https://truthsocial.com/@nomandates/posts/109226067948017484

Yeah, that where I copied the message.

Quote from: Solar on October 24, 2022, 07:34:50 PMYeah, that where I copied the message.

Thats weird. Maybe you have to be logged into truth or something. It works fine when I click it.

The thing is, try as I might, I cant seem to find this on youtube anywhere, and when I click on the video to go to rumble it says its a private video and wont let me view it thru rumble directly.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 24, 2022, 07:38:34 PMThats weird. Maybe you have to be logged into truth or something. It works fine when I click it.

The thing is, try as I might, I cant seem to find this on youtube anywhere, and when I click on the video to go to rumble it says its a private video and wont let me view it thru rumble directly.

It's possible it's buffered in your memory now. I have Truth, but it still said unavailable.

Quote from: Solar on October 24, 2022, 07:40:11 PMIt's possible it's buffered in your memory now. I have Truth, but it still said unavailable.

Thats sad, rumble and truth need to get that working together better. But since the link doesnt work I will explain better here....

Basically Hildog is referencing this upcoming supreme court case  Moore v Harper. It has to do with redistricting in North Carolina I think and basically it will enshrine the idea that only state legislatures can decide election stuff. She is making the case that this is undemocratic, but the big take away is that she is scared of it and expecting it soon (the case is early december I think).

Here is a link to explain it.
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/unpacking-the-lefts-disinformation-campaign-about-moore-v-harper/

QuoteOne of the cases the Supreme Court will hear next term is Moore v. Harper, an election redistricting case that arose out of the North Carolina Supreme Court's decision earlier this year to strike down North Carolina's congressional map. The map had been drawn following the 2020 census. It favored Republicans, and the court struck it down by a margin of 4–3. The court's members are elected, and their split followed the tribunal's political composition, with the four members who are Democrats comprising the majority.

That is the subject of the litigation before the U.S. Supreme Court and a brief just submitted by the attorneys for North Carolina state legislators, including their house speaker and senate president pro tempore, who are challenging the state supreme court's decision in federal court. The majority, notes the petitioners, was unable to identify a single true conflict between the map and the state's election laws. The court instead engaged in "unfettered policymaking," concocting from state constitutional provisions' open-ended guarantees of "free" or "fair" elections—or of equal protection and free speech among other unrelated rights—rules setting the amount of "permissible partisanship" for redistricting. And then, by fiat, the court created "a new congressional map."

As Justice Samuel Alito wrote in a dissent from a denial of stay in the case earlier this year, "none of those provisions" on which the court relied for its ruling "says anything about partisan gerrymandering, and all but one make no reference to elections at all." That one merely says "[a]ll elections shall be free." It is a guarantee dating back to 1776 that lasted 246 years without any court finding it to prohibit partisan gerrymandering.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 24, 2022, 08:00:08 PMThats sad, rumble and truth need to get that working together better. But since the link doesnt work I will explain better here....

Basically Hildog is referencing this upcoming supreme court case  Moore v Harper. It has to do with redistricting in North Carolina I think and basically it will enshrine the idea that only state legislatures can decide election stuff. She is making the case that this is undemocratic, but the big take away is that she is scared of it and expecting it soon (the case is early december I think).

Here is a link to explain it.
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/unpacking-the-lefts-disinformation-campaign-about-moore-v-harper/

What about the OP video? What exactly was said, or was it that short?

Quote from: Solar on October 25, 2022, 10:55:38 AMWhat about the OP video? What exactly was said, or was it that short?

It is the video that Possum has posted in that new thread so youve seen it now. Feel free to delete this thread since the video is in the other thread.

Quote from: T Hunt on October 25, 2022, 11:46:32 AMIt is the video that Possum has posted in that new thread so youve seen it now. Feel free to delete this thread since the video is in the other thread.

DOH!!!
I love how she frames it as theft, when it's actually in the Constitution.