Over 120,000 unreconciled votes

15,000 mail-in ballots sent out of state

1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out and 2,589,242 were sent back

21,000 confirmed dead voters

Over 300,000 voter registrations removed from the SURE system after November 3

Canvassing effort in Montgomery County found 78,000 phantom votes

Over 10,000 people voted by mail whose ID doesn't exist in the SURE system

Over 29,000 Duplicate Registrations

7,857 Registrations whose DOB changed in 2020

55,823 voters backfilled into the SURE system

4,458 voters whose registration date changed in 2020

1,059,547 Voters whose only vote on record was the 2020 election

https://www.auditthevotepa.com/

Quote from: Solar on June 01, 2021, 01:27:53 PMOver 120,000 unreconciled votes

15,000 mail-in ballots sent out of state

1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out and 2,589,242 were sent back

21,000 confirmed dead voters

Over 300,000 voter registrations removed from the SURE system after November 3

Canvassing effort in Montgomery County found 78,000 phantom votes

Over 10,000 people voted by mail whose ID doesn't exist in the SURE system

Over 29,000 Duplicate Registrations

7,857 Registrations whose DOB changed in 2020

55,823 voters backfilled into the SURE system

4,458 voters whose registration date changed in 2020

1,059,547 Voters whose only vote on record was the 2020 election

https://www.auditthevotepa.com/

There Was No Voter Fraud in Any of the 50 States, New York Times Finds

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/watch/there-was-no-voter-fraud-in-any-of-the-50-states-new-york-times-finds/vp-BB1aVnEK

Quote from: walkstall on June 01, 2021, 01:39:38 PMThere Was No Voter Fraud in Any of the 50 States, New York Times Finds

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/watch/there-was-no-voter-fraud-in-any-of-the-50-states-new-york-times-finds/vp-BB1aVnEK

But CNN said the only fake news comes from FUX and OANN.        
Need a good laugh?

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/edf8f1714cd9989532be9d4ee9173133c8ae686a73b1391cba741af75ecf768e.mp4

Someone shoot me.

Quote from: SueAnn on June 01, 2021, 05:05:30 PMSomeone shoot me.

     
Sad, isn't it that they actually believe their own BS.

Quote from: Solar on June 01, 2021, 01:27:53 PMOver 120,000 unreconciled votes

15,000 mail-in ballots sent out of state

1,823,148 mail-in ballots were sent out and 2,589,242 were sent back

21,000 confirmed dead voters

Over 300,000 voter registrations removed from the SURE system after November 3

Canvassing effort in Montgomery County found 78,000 phantom votes

Over 10,000 people voted by mail whose ID doesn't exist in the SURE system

Over 29,000 Duplicate Registrations

7,857 Registrations whose DOB changed in 2020

55,823 voters backfilled into the SURE system

4,458 voters whose registration date changed in 2020

1,059,547 Voters whose only vote on record was the 2020 election

https://www.auditthevotepa.com/

I could create a website in about 30 minutes and put literally any voter fraud numbers I wanted on the site, with absolutely no factual support for the claim, just as this person did.

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 04:05:57 AMI could create a website in about 30 minutes and put literally any voter fraud numbers I wanted on the site, with absolutely no factual support for the claim, just as this person did.

Except that we now call on you to prove that this is what this person did.  Go ahead; we've got time.   

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 04:05:57 AMI could create a website in about 30 minutes and put literally any voter fraud numbers I wanted on the site, with absolutely no factual support for the claim, just as this person did.

...and I could post an email, without bothering to SCROLL DOWN to the evidence, not bothering to read or listen to any of the factual support for those claims.  So, what's your point - is it you accuse yourself?

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 04:05:57 AMI could create a website in about 30 minutes and put literally any voter fraud numbers I wanted on the site, with absolutely no factual support for the claim, just as this person did.

Yes, you could, that's what libs do, but we don't have to because Conservatives don't lie and cheat to win.
How is it you missed the feeling of winning honestly, where everyone abides by the same rules instead of forcing an agenda of hate through coercion and blackmail?

Your party uses Marxists/anarchists under the guise of antifa and BLM to threaten, assault, even kill to get their way, why is that, could it be that people are sick of your shit and want nothing to do with communism that you had to resort to violence?

We don't lie and cheat, because if we did and were found out, we'd be ostracized from the movement and never trusted again. That's Right, for us, it's all about trust, which makes for a functioning society.
Conservatism = Society. Prove me wrong, prove liberalism/communism as we see today, is acceptable as a functioning society.

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 04:05:57 AMI could create a website in about 30 minutes and put literally any voter fraud numbers I wanted on the site, with absolutely no factual support for the claim, just as this person did.

And YOUR website would be just like the MSM.

Quote from: Grammy on June 06, 2021, 04:49:07 AMExcept that we now call on you to prove that this is what this person did.  Go ahead; we've got time. 

The one link of proof that was easily viewable was the dead people voting link here.

So, I pick the first unique name (2nd on the list) Gloria M. Golembiewski, figuring it'll be easier to research her name than Ronald Smith.  I search for her info online here and it shows her with a current address and phone, which is odd for a dead person.

So, I open the "obituary" link on the same doc that is supposed to prove she's dead. The Ancestry.com link shows her's and another relatives names in headstones.  And I think "holy shit! This may be legit voter fraud!"

Then I zoom in on the headstone and see there's no date of death inscribed because she's not dead:

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/152113522/gloria-m-golembiewski



So, then I go back to the first one - Ron D. Smith that shows he died in 2005 on tributes.com.  only problem is, he's still alive, too!  It has his current address and two phone numbers. You could call him right now, if you were so inclined:

Ronald D Smith
Age 83 (Sep 1937)

Current Address
1813 Lincoln Way
White Oak, PA 15131
Allegheny County
(Dec 1984 - Jun 2021)


Phone Numbers
(412) 673-2728 - Landline
Last reported May 2021
(412) 673-2413 - Landline
Last reported Mar 2021

https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/find/person/pn2n4u89496ul9000280

Needless to say, the research is not easy on my phone, so after the proof went 0-2, I stopped.

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 05:50:51 AMThe one link of proof that was easily viewable was the dead people voting link here.

So, I pick the first unique name (2nd on the list) Gloria M. Golembiewski, figuring it'll be easier to research her name than Ronald Smith.  I search for her info online here and it shows her with a current address and phone, which is odd for a dead person.

So, I open the "obituary" link on the same doc that is supposed to prove she's dead. The Ancestry.com link shows her's and another relatives names in headstones.  And I think "holy shit! This may be legit voter fraud!"

Then I zoom in on the headstone and see there's no date of death inscribed because she's not dead:

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/152113522/gloria-m-golembiewski



So, then I go back to the first one - Ron D. Smith that shows he died in 2005 on tributes.com.  only problem is, he's still alive, too!  It has his current address and two phone numbers. You could call him right now, if you were so inclined:

Ronald D Smith
Age 83 (Sep 1937)

Current Address
1813 Lincoln Way
White Oak, PA 15131
Allegheny County
(Dec 1984 - Jun 2021)


Phone Numbers
(412) 673-2728 - Landline
Last reported May 2021
(412) 673-2413 - Landline
Last reported Mar 2021

https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/find/person/pn2n4u89496ul9000280

Needless to say, the research is not easy on my phone, so after the proof went 0-2, I stopped.

A word of caution, PB, phone records are not the best source to determine if someone is still living, particularly someone who is a Senior Citizen.

When the person dies, the person left behind will almost always keep the phone in the name of the deceased.  Why? 2 reasons, security and money. If the deceased is the man of the house, his widow will not want to change the name on record to hers because it will reflect that she now lives alone.  Widows have always been targets of ne'er-do-wells. Also, the phone company will charge a ridiculous amount of money to change names on an account.  So, best just to leave the phone in the name of the deceased. 

I have several ladies in my own family who did as described.  Even though their husbands had predeceased them by decades.

The deceased still owns a phone number on record, but they really should not be voting any longer.

I encourage you to keep digging, PB.  Keep trying to prove us wrong.  If we are being lied to, we need to know it.  But it might well turn out that YOU are being lied to.  If so, come join our ranks.  Either way, keep searching for the truth, even when it is uncomfortable.

Neither is Google & Bing a reliable source for addresses.
Not my neighbor, but 2 farms down from me - routinely gets deliveries for our address.
Only the mailman accurately & consistently deliveries to our address.

And, we don't mind a bit, they can take those 2am no-knock warrants for us, should it ever happen.

Mr Ronald D Smith is indeed deceased.

Ronald David Smith
in the U.S., Social Security Applications and Claims Index, 1936-2007

Name:   Ronald David Smith
[Ronald D Smith]
Gender:   Male
Race:   White
Birth Date:   1 Sep 1937
Birth Place:   Huntingdon, Pennsylvania
Death Date:   2 May 2005
Father:   
Andrew A Smith
Mother:   
Martha B David
SSN:   185303438
Notes:   Nov 1954: Name listed as RONALD DAVID SMITH; 06 May 2005: Name listed as RONALD D SMITH

Quote from: p1tchblack on June 06, 2021, 05:50:51 AMThe one link of proof that was easily viewable was the dead people voting link here.

So, I pick the first unique name (2nd on the list) Gloria M. Golembiewski, figuring it'll be easier to research her name than Ronald Smith.  I search for her info online here and it shows her with a current address and phone, which is odd for a dead person.

So, I open the "obituary" link on the same doc that is supposed to prove she's dead. The Ancestry.com link shows her's and another relatives names in headstones.  And I think "holy shit! This may be legit voter fraud!"

Then I zoom in on the headstone and see there's no date of death inscribed because she's not dead:

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/152113522/gloria-m-golembiewski



So, then I go back to the first one - Ron D. Smith that shows he died in 2005 on tributes.com.  only problem is, he's still alive, too!  It has his current address and two phone numbers. You could call him right now, if you were so inclined:

Ronald D Smith
Age 83 (Sep 1937)

Current Address
1813 Lincoln Way
White Oak, PA 15131
Allegheny County
(Dec 1984 - Jun 2021)


Phone Numbers
(412) 673-2728 - Landline
Last reported May 2021
(412) 673-2413 - Landline
Last reported Mar 2021

https://www.truepeoplesearch.com/find/person/pn2n4u89496ul9000280

Needless to say, the research is not easy on my phone, so after the proof went 0-2, I stopped.

What do you mean, "this may be legit voter fraud"?
We have already shown you mountains of hard evidence of a landslide election for trump stolen. Are you still questioning that? Because in order to do so you have to show a single shred of hard evidence that the election was legit, legal, and NOT stolen.

If you cannot show us any hard evidence that it was completely above board then you have to retract any claims that the election was legal and legit. Remember, when it comes to elections, the burden of proof is ALWAYS on those claiming they were fine legal and legit, not on those claiming fraud and cheating.

So, do you have any such evidence of a fair and legal election, or will you retract your implication that the election was fine?