(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/BE8694E5-6198-4AD3-97B1-04A95922F16A-scaled.jpeg)
Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.
Read it all here!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/full-report-canvassing-work-completed-arizonas-maricopa-county/
Quote from: Solar on September 08, 2021, 07:55:45 PM(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/BE8694E5-6198-4AD3-97B1-04A95922F16A-scaled.jpeg)
Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.
Read it all here!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/full-report-canvassing-work-completed-arizonas-maricopa-county/
Here's a couple basic definitions:
Lost votes=-votes subtracted.
-people who voted, yet whos votes were not counted.
-they told the canvassers that they voted, yet they are shown to have not voted.
Ghost votes=-votes added.
-extra mail in votes added for people who already voted once in person.
-they told the canvassers that they voted on election day, yet there is a mail in ballot also shown for them.
Quote from: Solar on September 08, 2021, 07:55:45 PM(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/BE8694E5-6198-4AD3-97B1-04A95922F16A-scaled.jpeg)
Lost votes are those votes where people voted but their votes were discarded.
Ghost votes are those votes cast by someone other than the voter assigned to the vote.
Dead voters accounted for a significant number of these anomalies.
Read it all here!
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/full-report-canvassing-work-completed-arizonas-maricopa-county/
Not a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2XkP-W5VrKoRx5ZLnWea05JQwvvnbhDuyl0uO4DdglxIrxc_cJVzH1904
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:12:59 AMNot a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2XkP-W5VrKoRx5ZLnWea05JQwvvnbhDuyl0uO4DdglxIrxc_cJVzH1904
Well that's that, there was no fraud, let's pack it in guys, PB got us on a technicality.
Therefore, we must ignore millions of fraudulent votes and let the DNC destroy the country.
Are you fuckin serious? You think anyone here will ever take your lying ass as sober ever again?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:12:59 AMNot a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2XkP-W5VrKoRx5ZLnWea05JQwvvnbhDuyl0uO4DdglxIrxc_cJVzH1904
Sorry but that house was technically a separate lot. The votes came from the empty area just like they said. A simple google maps search will show you the empty lot. The address is just the closest place to the empty lot where the votes came from.
So you have nothing and the report stands, MASSIVE FRAUD. Sorry, there is no getting out of this one. Let the decertifying begin!
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 06:10:02 AMSorry but that house was technically a separate lot. The votes came from the empty area just like they said. A simple google maps search will show you the empty lot. The address is just the closest place to the empty lot where the votes came from.
So you have nothing and the report stands, MASSIVE FRAUD. Sorry, there is no getting out of this one. Let the decertifying begin!
Well, any number of home value/sales sites, and the Maricopa county assessor himself, disagrees.
https://twitter.com/RecordersOffice/status/1436387002841186309?s=19
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:12:59 AMNot a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2XkP-W5VrKoRx5ZLnWea05JQwvvnbhDuyl0uO4DdglxIrxc_cJVzH1904
Given a two week vacation and this is the best you can come up with. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Possum on September 15, 2021, 06:32:49 AMGiven a two week vacation and this is the best you can come up with. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Not at all. This was just the low hanging fruit due to the image in the OP.
Quote from: Possum on September 15, 2021, 06:32:49 AMGiven a two week vacation and this is the best you can come up with. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
He is looking for a Month Vacation. The way he is posting.
If you take a photo of my place. From above it will show you my Neighbor(s) are over 3/4 mile away. But if you that a phot from the front or side, you would not know that. :lol: I see they did not put a drone in the air for that shot. What is next door. :lol:
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedub75.yolasite.com%2Fresources%2Fbeverly.PNG.opt800x905o0%252C0s800x905.PNG&hash=4423bf36616fdbdb5e6ac256140ea06d9995f2dd)
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 07:48:58 AM(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedub75.yolasite.com%2Fresources%2Fbeverly.PNG.opt800x905o0%252C0s800x905.PNG&hash=4423bf36616fdbdb5e6ac256140ea06d9995f2dd)
So what's your point?
The fraud still stands, are you denying that?
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 07:55:58 AMSo what's your point?
The fraud still stands, are you denying that?
My point is that it's difficult to take this seriously when they can't even get accurate information on their cover page...after two tries.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 06:32:41 AMWell, any number of home value/sales sites, and the Maricopa county assessor himself, disagrees.
https://twitter.com/RecordersOffice/status/1436387002841186309?s=19
But you can see for yourself that indeed there is an empty lot there so the report is correct. Massive fraud found.
But instead you are taking the word of another bought and paid for public official just like the maricopa board.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 07:48:58 AM(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedub75.yolasite.com%2Fresources%2Fbeverly.PNG.opt800x905o0%252C0s800x905.PNG&hash=4423bf36616fdbdb5e6ac256140ea06d9995f2dd)
:lol: :lol: :lol: why are you using a cut manipulated photo? The real photo shows the empty lot, why dont you show that one instead of this edited one?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:27:42 AMMy point is that it's difficult to take this seriously when they can't even get accurate information on their cover page...after two tries.
Ya but you spout inaccurate info on here all the time, many more than twice, and the MSM manufactured evidence for the debunked russiagate hoax. Are we to not take you or them seriously anymore based on your own standard?
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 08:43:38 AM:lol: :lol: :lol: why are you using a cut manipulated photo? The real photo shows the empty lot, why dont you show that one instead of this edited one?
The lot is 4+ acres. Here's another, zoomed out pic from Google Maps, which anyone is able to use to view the home for themselves:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338/@33.374011,-112.344882,474m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!2s13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338!3b1!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548!3m4!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedub75.yolasite.com%2Fresources%2Fbeverly2.PNG.opt800x1022o0%252C0s800x1022.PNG&hash=abd636f7b9a26aad606b2aeea5335a00e6c18936)
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:27:42 AMMy point is that it's difficult to take this seriously when they can't even get accurate information on their cover page...after two tries.
No, what you attempted to do was invalidate the entire audit based on what you claim isn't accurate.
This is like throwing out the entire meal because a fly landed on a plate in the other room.
We don't know what the cover has to do with anything, nor do we care, like judging a book by its cover.
So here's your challenge. Prove the audit is a fraudulent document!
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 09:53:31 AMNo, what you attempted to do was invalidate the entire audit based on what you claim isn't accurate.
This is like throwing out the entire meal because a fly landed on a plate in the other room.
We don't know what the cover has to do with anything, nor do we care, like judging a book by its cover.
So here's your challenge. Prove the audit is a fraudulent document!
The document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it. Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything. They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:12:53 AMThe document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it. Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything. They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.
For example?
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 10:14:40 AMFor example?
They have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues. They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples. So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots. If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:20:35 AMThey have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues. They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples. So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots. If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.
So casting votes from an empty lot, means it didn't happen? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 10:22:26 AMSo casting votes from an empty lot, means it didn't happen? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Which one was an example of a vote being cast from an empty lot?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:50:09 AMWhich one was an example of a vote being cast from an empty lot?
You tell me, you seem to want to claim to have all the answers. You've already dismissed it out of hand. So get to work, prove it's illegitimate.
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:02:13 AMYou tell me, you seem to want to claim to have all the answers. You've already dismissed it out of hand. So get to work, prove it's illegitimate.
I dismissed the two things that are dismissible: the two cover page claims of votes from empty lots.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 11:24:35 AMI dismissed the two things that are dismissible: the two cover page claims of votes from empty lots.
And did they find votes votes addressed to empty lots?
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:28:16 AMAnd did they find votes votes addressed to empty lots?
I don't know. Like I said, the preliminary report provides no specifics. As of now, no, they haven't provided any legitimate examples of votes from empty lots.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 11:37:22 AMI don't know. Like I said, the preliminary report provides no specifics. As of now, no, they haven't provided any legitimate examples of votes from empty lots.
So your initial claim was BS, is that what you're saying?
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:58:34 AMSo your initial claim was BS, is that what you're saying?
I don't believe so:
Not a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 12:30:41 PMI don't believe so:
Not a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1615
That was your freebie lie. Next one you get another time out.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 12:30:41 PMI don't believe so:
Not a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
As Taxed pointed out, your original claim was BS.
https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/068/618/original/76c7edcc0ab4ccea.mp4
Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 02:11:23 PMAs Taxed pointed out, your original claim was BS.
I get them being wrong all the time and think it's adorable and entertaining, but outright lying is annoying.
Quote from: taxed on September 15, 2021, 02:34:08 PMI get them being wrong all the time and think it's adorable and entertaining, but outright lying is annoying.
It's all they have.... :glare:
Quote from: taxed on September 15, 2021, 02:03:53 PMhttps://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1615
That was your freebie lie. Next one you get another time out.
https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:12:53 AMThe document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it. Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything. They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.
How is almost 200,000 votes proven to have been added/subtracted from the count vague? Thats very specific.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:20:35 AMThey have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues. They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples. So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots. If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.
You dont need specific examples.
You dont get to comb over every single voter they canvassed. They did the work and here are the results. Unless you have any evidence to the contrary then this stand as public fact, that about 200,000 votes were added or subtracted from the actual count, aka massive fraud proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Youve lost the argument and have no leg to stand on. The left cheated, and thats that.
CLAIM CONFIRMED
I dont even need to show you that mountain of evidence anymore, I can just reference this to prove massive fraud and that biden didnt win.
Now this can be used to guarantee decertifying the states electoral votes.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:56:56 AMThe lot is 4+ acres. Here's another, zoomed out pic from Google Maps, which anyone is able to use to view the home for themselves:
https://www.google.com/maps/place/13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338/@33.374011,-112.344882,474m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!2s13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338!3b1!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548!3m4!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548
(https://conservativepoliticalforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fedub75.yolasite.com%2Fresources%2Fbeverly2.PNG.opt800x1022o0%252C0s800x1022.PNG&hash=abd636f7b9a26aad606b2aeea5335a00e6c18936)
See, empty lot, case rested.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 03:03:11 PMhttps://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20
No you missed it, they said the building was destroyed 2020. Its not there now. You were caught lying. You lose.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:15:35 PMHow is almost 200,000 votes proven to have been added/subtracted from the count vague? Thats very specific.
It's not 200k. They only got about 5k responses, so they must have taken their limited findings and extrapolated them out across all votes. However, based on the two specific examples on their cover page, they yet to provide one legitimate, specific example.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:28:21 PMIt's not 200k. They only got about 5k responses, so they must have taken their limited findings and extrapolated them out across all votes. However, based on the two specific examples on their cover page, they yet to provide one legitimate, specific example.
Of course they extrapolated and thats still fact because thats how math and science works.
But more importantly you have no evidence that these two examples where wrong since we debunked you attempted lie.
So will you provide some legit evidence or will you retract your claim?
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:25:06 PMNo you missed it, they said the building was destroyed 2020. Its not there now. You were caught lying. You lose.
It was a mobile home park and the registered voter had their mail forwarded for a year which, as the County Assessor stated, is legal.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:30:03 PMOf course they extrapolated and thats still fact because thats how math and science works.
But more importantly you have no evidence that these two examples where wrong since we debunked you attempted lie.
So will you provide some legit evidence or will you retract your claim?
I'll defer to the Maricopa County Assessor:
https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:31:43 PMI'll defer to the Maricopa County Assessor:
https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20
So you defer to him when we already proved he is lying and that there is in fact no house there only an empty lot?
So you are willingly choosing the lie over the facts proven here by us?
Thats called TDS son, you have a mental disorder. Dont be willfully ignorant, follow the facts.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:30:22 PMIt was a mobile home park and the registered voter had their mail forwarded for a year which, as the County Assessor stated, is legal.
No sorry that cannot be true since the canvassers would have had that info and would have still canvassed the guy at his new location. So it seems again the assessor is lying. Typical govt official. Not surprised.
Sorry but you arent getting out of this one. :biggrin:
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:34:16 PMSo you defer to him when we already proved he is lying and that there is in fact no house there only an empty lot?
So you are willingly choosing the lie over the facts proven here by us?
Thats called TDS son, you have a mental disorder. Dont be willfully ignorant, follow the facts.
The house is right there. If a physical house existing isn't proof of a physical house existing, I can't help you.
The lot is over 4 acres. Do you expect there to be a four acre house so there's not unused space?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:38:58 PMThe house is right there. If a physical house existing isn't proof of a physical house existing, I can't help you.
The lot is over 4 acres. Do you expect there to be a four acre house so there's not unused space?
Ummm you do realize google maps isnt live right? That house was destroyed. Its not there anymore as taxed said. The google maps pic is out of date.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 08:07:41 PMUmmm you do realize google maps isnt live right? That house was destroyed. Its not there anymore as taxed said. The google maps pic is out of date.
Someone better tell realtor.com that the 21 pictures they have of a house at the address don't exist.
https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/13226-W-Beverly-Rd_Goodyear_AZ_85338_M20462-24192
(https://media0.giphy.com/media/bC9czlgCMtw4cj8RgH/giphy.gif)
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:35:53 PMSomeone better tell realtor.com that the 21 pictures they have of a house at the address don't exist.
https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/13226-W-Beverly-Rd_Goodyear_AZ_85338_M20462-24192
(https://media0.giphy.com/media/bC9czlgCMtw4cj8RgH/giphy.gif)
Or at least tell them their pics are outdated and the house isnt there anymore.
(https://i.postimg.cc/VN8zFhGj/947afd51f21590d107c25e948cb3a8949e02b87ede06f8ec27a657e47b506102.jpg)
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 12:22:27 AMOr at least tell them their pics are outdated and the house isnt there anymore.
(https://i.postimg.cc/VN8zFhGj/947afd51f21590d107c25e948cb3a8949e02b87ede06f8ec27a657e47b506102.jpg)
Based on the varying descriptions and pics, it looks like the old house was torn down in a new one built in its place. Either way, what is relevant in this discussion is that there is a house on the lot at 13226 w. Beverly.
One thing the county assessor did get wrong is that you can't legally forward absentee / mail in ballots. If the ballots were forwarded and used, that would be illegal, but not the type of voter fraud we are looking for here, if the person voting was legally registered.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 05:41:29 AMBased on the varying descriptions and pics, it looks like the old house was torn down in a new one built in its place. Either way, what is relevant in this discussion is that there is a house on the lot at 13226 w. Beverly.
NO, what is relevant is that there were 173,000 lost votes and 96,000 ghost votes.
Quote from: Possum on September 16, 2021, 05:59:31 AMNO, what is relevant is that there were 173,000 lost votes and 96,000 ghost votes.
While I appreciate her effort, until there are specific examples, I'm not going to take the word of a realtor turned statistician/election auditor.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 06:30:02 AMWhile I appreciate her effort, until there are specific examples, I'm not going to take the word of a realtor turned statistician/election auditor.
What an elitist little punk you are!
Let me guess. Because they didn't get a "degree", or paid for a Govt license, they are to be disqualified?
Son, I've had no real college background, none that mattered, but I'm an expert in many fields, most I've trained as interns entering the industry.
It's idiots like you stuck in the world the left sold us that has people locked in an endless cycle of debt, because they believed, like you, that a degree would assure them employment.
(Those that can, Do. Those that can't, Teach)
Thing is, it's people like me who taught the people who couldn't do the job, that the colleges hired to teach people the university system who suckered people with no natural talent, and sold them a worthless piece of paper.
Your elitism is exposing your skid mark so change your underwear, you're soiling our furniture.
Quote from: Solar on September 16, 2021, 07:55:15 AMWhat an elitist little punk you are!
Let me guess. Because they didn't get a "degree", or paid for a Govt license, they are to be disqualified?
Son, I've had no real college background, none that mattered, but I'm an expert in many fields, most I've trained as interns entering the industry.
It's idiots like you stuck in the world the left sold us that has people locked in an endless cycle of debt, because they believed, like you, that a degree would assure them employment.
(Those that can, Do. Those that can't, Teach)
Thing is, it's people like me who taught the people who couldn't do the job, that the colleges hired to teach people the university system who suckered people with no natural talent, and sold them a worthless piece of paper.
Your elitism is exposing your skid mark so change your underwear, you're soiling our furniture.
I wouldn't take the word of an actual statistician without specific examples. Again, not one example of verifiable voter fraud has been provided in the initial report, but the fact that she
is a realtor by trade means that the odds of mathematical/statistical mistakes being made is increased.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 08:22:55 AMI wouldn't take the word of an actual statistician without specific examples. Again, not one example of verifiable voter fraud has been provided in the initial report, but the fact that she is a realtor by trade means that the odds of mathematical/statistical mistakes being made is increased.
What do you suppose initial report means?
I don't care if she is a dish washer, her job has no bearing on her actual abilities, my little leftist elitist!
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 05:41:29 AMBased on the varying descriptions and pics, it looks like the old house was torn down in a new one built in its place. Either way, what is relevant in this discussion is that there is a house on the lot at 13226 w. Beverly.
Right....except that there isnt one there now as taxed pointed out....so the pic is accurate and the canvass stands.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 05:55:11 AMOne thing the county assessor did get wrong is that you can't legally forward absentee / mail in ballots. If the ballots were forwarded and used, that would be illegal, but not the type of voter fraud we are looking for here, if the person voting was legally registered.
But they werent or else the canvass wouldnt have caught them.
Remember, we already know the govt is in on the steal and thus nothing any government official says can be completely trusted.
Remember, we already know this canvass is 100% credible and legit. Whatever their findings are that is the reality of the count.
Remember, we have already proven it impossible for biden to have won and that there was massive cheating, so these canvass results pass the common sense test.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 06:30:02 AMWhile I appreciate her effort, until there are specific examples, I'm not going to take the word of a realtor turned statistician/election auditor.
AHAHAHAH no you will take the word of the GOVERNMENT over that of a PRIVATE CITIZEN GROUP, thus proving your bias and prejudice against the truth.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 08:22:55 AMI wouldn't take the word of an actual statistician without specific examples. Again, not one example of verifiable voter fraud has been provided in the initial report, but the fact that she is a realtor by trade means that the odds of mathematical/statistical mistakes being made is increased.
But you are only thinking this way because you dont WANT it to be true.
Remember, we have already shown you absolute proof the election was stolen and not only could you provide no proof biden won but you wont even look at the evidence trump won.
So we know you would normally trust this report except that it says something you dont like and that hurts your side, so of course you wont trust it.
Thank God removing biden doesnt depend on stubborn children like you accepting any of the evidence.
Quote from: Solar on September 16, 2021, 09:07:18 AMWhat do you suppose initial report means?
I don't care if she is a dish washer, her job has no bearing on her actual abilities, my little leftist elitist!
We don't know her abilities. She may be a great statistician...who just decided to get into real estate.
If I needed surgery, and a realtor offered to do it, I'd want her/him to prove they had the ability. I wouldn't just assume they did.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 09:27:10 AMBut they werent or else the canvass wouldnt have caught them.
The canvasser found an empty lot and saw that a vote came from that address. We have no idea the situation surrounding that.
QuoteRemember, we already know the govt is in on the steal and thus nothing any government official says can be completely trusted.
You shouldn't trust anyone based on their profession, including realtors.
QuoteRemember, we already know this canvass is 100% credible and legit. Whatever their findings are that is the reality of the count.
Your requirement for proof is substantially lower than mine.
QuoteRemember, we have already proven it impossible for biden to have won and that there was massive cheating, so these canvass results pass the common sense test.
I'm only talking about the canvassing.... lest I be threatened with banning. Which, btw, a thread about this sites popularity can be derailed into a discussion about girl scout cookies, but nobody loses their minds... strange indeed.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 09:31:55 AMBut you are only thinking this way because you dont WANT it to be true.
Well, you'd have to be some kind of sociopath to actually
want there to be mass voter fraud and our democracy compromised so, yes, I do hope it's not the case.
QuoteRemember, we have already shown you absolute proof the election was stolen and not only could you provide no proof biden won but you wont even look at the evidence trump won.
I disagree.
QuoteSo we know you would normally trust this report except that it says something you dont like and that hurts your side, so of course you wont trust it.
At this point I neither trust or distrust the report because, again, there have been no details provided.
QuoteThank God removing biden doesnt depend on stubborn children like you accepting any of the evidence.
lol....
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 11:44:38 AMThe canvasser found an empty lot and saw that a vote came from that address. We have no idea the situation surrounding that.
Actually we do. The canvass said that a vote came from no one. We have no reason to doubt the preliminary report since it only confirms what we already know. Do you have some evidence to discredit them?
QuoteYou shouldn't trust anyone based on their profession, including realtors.
Right, the realtor site was clearly outdated since there is no house there and no one at that address yet a fake ballot came from there.
QuoteYour requirement for proof is substantially lower than mine.
No, mine are realistic and normal. Your requirement is elevated artificially high as a tool so that you can deny anything you do not like or fits your agenda. See in reality you will still be denying this when biden is removed and in jail and trump is in his 2nd term. No amount of evidence will work seeing as you still trust the very sources that say trump is a russian spy and manufactured that hoax. See, you have evidence that they are the enemy of america and lie more often than anything on the right, yet you refuse to adapt your path of thinking using that fact.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 11:46:46 AMWell, you'd have to be some kind of sociopath to actually want there to be mass voter fraud and our democracy compromised so, yes, I do hope it's not the case.
So you admit that you want them to be dishonest and lie about the voter fraud soley because you dont WANT the voter fraud to be real. I guess you are some kind of sociopath...
QuoteI disagree.
But you dont disagree based on any evidence or logical train of thought that you can provide here. If you do have any evidence please show it here now...
See, you are only using your emotions to arrive at that conclusion. But again, Thank God nothing depends on your acceptance of reality.
QuoteAt this point I neither trust or distrust the report because, again, there have been no details provided.
But does there need to be details? There doesnt. This group isnt the media. You can trust or not trust it based on the reputation of those conducting it which to this point has been stellar.
Instead you insist on giving the benefit of the doubt to the MSM and the Government, both of whom lied about the manufactured russiagate hoax.
See how you arent thinking logically? You are not properly attributing reputation to those who deserve it and who have lost it. You will never get to the correct conclusions when you insist on beginning at a false starting point.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 12:00:43 PMActually we do. The canvass said that a vote came from no one. We have no reason to doubt the preliminary report since it only confirms what we already know. Do you have some evidence to discredit them?
That's not what the report said at all. If there was a vote cast, it was in someone's name. The details behind who cast the vote and how they got the ballot is what we don't know because, again, there have been no details provided.
QuoteRight, the realtor site was clearly outdated since there is no house there and no one at that address yet a fake ballot came from there.
Again... there was a house there. There might be a new house there now. At one time, two voters lived there so, like the other address, the question to be answered is who voted and how did they get the ballot? Was it forwarded to them? Did they get their mail from the address even though the house was being leveled because they built a new house? Again, we have no details, so we don't know anything except that the writers of the report removed the 2058 address and replaced it with the 13226 address for some reason.
QuoteNo, mine are realistic and normal. Your requirement is elevated artificially high as a tool so that you can deny anything you do not like or fits your agenda. See in reality you will still be denying this when biden is removed and in jail and trump is in his 2nd term. No amount of evidence will work seeing as you still trust the very sources that say trump is a russian spy and manufactured that hoax. See, you have evidence that they are the enemy of america and lie more often than anything on the right, yet you refuse to adapt your path of thinking using that fact.
I'm convinced that nobody here knows what lying actually means.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 12:16:38 PMQuoteBut does there need to be details? There doesnt. This group isnt the media. You can trust or not trust it based on the reputation of those conducting it which to this point has been stellar.
Instead you insist on giving the benefit of the doubt to the MSM and the Government, both of whom lied about the manufactured russiagate hoax.
See how you arent thinking logically? You are not properly attributing reputation to those who deserve it and who have lost it. You will never get to the correct conclusions when you insist on beginning at a false starting point.
Yes, there needs to be details. We need to see the examples that were the basis for their numbers, otherwise the numbers mean absolutely nothing. I could take the same report and replace every number on there, by double, and call it 'legit' and you would believe it.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 12:24:50 PMThat's not what the report said at all. If there was a vote cast, it was in someone's name. The details behind who cast the vote and how they got the ballot is what we don't know because, again, there have been no details provided.
Wrong. The report shows that these votes are ghost votes, coming from thin air. In other words that these were ADDED to the count, thus massive fraud. Its over now, you can stop.
QuoteAgain... there was a house there. There might be a new house there now.
Wrong. There is NOT A HOUSSE THERE NOW as taxed proved, thus proving the canvass correct that a ghost vote came from there.
QuoteAt one time, two voters lived there so, like the other address, the question to be answered is who voted and how did they get the ballot? Was it forwarded to them? Did they get their mail from the address even though the house was being leveled because they built a new house? Again, we have no details, so we don't know anything except that the writers of the report removed the 2058 address and replaced it with the 13226 address for some reason.
Wrong. We KNOW that no one is there now(for the 2020 election) yet a vote was cast from there
illegally. Those are the FACTS that we KNOW because the canvassers PROVED it.
QuoteI'm convinced that nobody here knows what lying actually means.
This coming from the one person to claim he is more moral than God.
(https://i.postimg.cc/NMTmSP0w/raw.gif)
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 12:26:41 PMYes, there needs to be details. We need to see the examples that were the basis for their numbers, otherwise the numbers mean absolutely nothing.
Why EXACTLY do we NEED that, and why would it mean nothing?
QuoteI could take the same report and replace every number on there, by double, and call it 'legit' and you would believe it.
No you couldnt, for the simple reason that you have no credibilty since you have been caught repeatedly lying and ignoring or making up evidence.
The group who did the canvass is not burdened by any of those doubts of credibility.
Add to that that the results simply confirm what we ALREADY HAVE PROVEN.
See how reason and deduction work? Try it for once...
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 12:37:32 PMWrong. The report shows that these votes are ghost votes, coming from thin air. In other words that these were ADDED to the count, thus massive fraud. Its over now, you can stop.
The report makes claims which are unproven. Until we have examples/specifics those numbers are meaningless. Like I said, I could literally change every number on that report and there would be NO reason not to believe them using your requirement for proof.
QuoteWrong. There is NOT A HOUSSE THERE NOW as taxed proved, thus proving the canvass correct that a ghost vote came from there.
Right... we are 10 months from the election. We need to know what was there when the election was held, who, if anyone, was living there and whether they received their ballot legally.
QuoteWrong. We KNOW that no one is there now(for the 2020 election) yet a vote was cast from there illegally. Those are the FACTS that we KNOW because the canvassers PROVED it.
This coming from the one person to claim he is more moral than God.
Again, we have no idea who cast the vote and the circumstances surrounding that vote. We know the trailer park was sold in February 2020. We need to know when everyone moved out and the actual homes were no longer occupied. If they were unoccupied before the election, then how did the person who used to live there, and was registered there, get their ballot.
[/quote]
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 12:40:02 PMWhy EXACTLY do we NEED that, and why would it mean nothing?
Because, without specifics and knowing where their numbers came from they are meaningless. If you trust their numbers, based on what they've provided, then you would have believed their numbers if they increased all of them by 10k, 20k, 50k, etc before the report was published.
QuoteNo you couldnt, for the simple reason that you have no credibilty since you have been caught repeatedly lying and ignoring or making up evidence.
And why does she have credibility?
QuoteThe group who did the canvass is not burdened by any of those doubts of credibility.
Add to that that the results simply confirm what we ALREADY HAVE PROVEN.
See how reason and deduction work? Try it for once...
They've proven nothing as far as their process, their method of determining their numbers and have provided no examples. They are not discredited, but they've provided not details. As I keep saying, they could have changed every number on the report and those who want to believe them would still have believed them...that's why we need to know how they got to those numbers and need details: voter names, addresses, etc.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 12:45:04 PMThe report makes claims which are unproven. Until we have examples/specifics those numbers are meaningless. Like I said, I could literally change every number on that report and there would be NO reason not to believe them using your requirement for proof.
Really? Let me remind you of my requirement for proof...
"No you couldnt, for the simple reason that you have no credibility since you have been caught repeatedly lying and ignoring or making up evidence.
The group who did the canvass is not burdened by any of those doubts of credibility."
Try again.
QuoteRight... we are 10 months from the election. We need to know what was there when the election was held, who, if anyone, was living there and whether they received their ballot legally.
No you missed it, taxed showed that there was in fact no house there and thus a ballot came from nowhere as the canvass shows.
QuoteAgain, we have no idea who cast the vote and the circumstances surrounding that vote.
Wrong. We KNOW that no one cast the vote, it cant be a ghost vote otherwise.
QuoteWe know the trailer park was sold in February 2020. We need to know when everyone moved out and the actual homes were no longer occupied. If they were unoccupied before the election, then how did the person who used to live there, and was registered there, get their ballot.
Right, the canvassers would have already addressed all that so they arent questions anymore, they have been answered. They 'got' their ballot by creating it themselves, that what ghost votes are.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 12:53:40 PMBecause, without specifics and knowing where their numbers came from they are meaningless.
How are they meaningless when they followed all the proper procedures and did everything according to the book, and when their results match whats already been confirmed?
QuoteIf you trust their numbers, based on what they've provided, then you would have believed their numbers if they increased all of them by 10k, 20k, 50k, etc before the report was published.
Wrong. We would not trust them if they were lying or dishonest in any way because we only listen to facts and evidence. So if they changed their numbers then we would see it because it would not state reality, it would state a lie, thus we would know it wasnt true. But since we dont see that we know they are telling the truth.
I mean the full report is coming so we know they CANNOT lie. Your attacks on their credibility are meaningless.
QuoteAnd why does she have credibility?
Because several reasons. 1) Acknowledging the steal to begin with. You cannot be impartial if you dont acknowledge that facts we already have proving the election was rigged. Thus ONLY THOSE WHO ACCEPT THE COUP HAPPEND can be trusted to do honest research further. Thats called logical thinking.
2)She ISNT THE MSM or the GOVERNMENT. She is not on the side of the enemies of america and is a patriot. That gives her a mountain of credibility among most americans.
QuoteThey've proven nothing as far as their process, their method of determining their numbers and have provided no examples. They are not discredited, but they've provided not details.
But they dont need too, their credibility has already been established. But dont worry, they will show the whole thing eventually, however adults can use their brains and dont need to wait for that before drawing conclusions.
Funny, from what you are saying it sounds like you wont believe the Audits preliminary reports either. If not then whats the point of preliminary reports at all?
QuoteAs I keep saying, they could have changed every number on the report and those who want to believe them would still have believed them...that's why we need to know how they got to those numbers and need details: voter names, addresses, etc.
But how could they have done that without lying? And we already know they arent lying, so what reason could you possibly have to suspect that when their findings only confirm whats already been proven?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 11:05:45 AMWe don't know her abilities. She may be a great statistician...who just decided to get into real estate.
If I needed surgery, and a realtor offered to do it, I'd want her/him to prove they had the ability. I wouldn't just assume they did.
We're not talking medicine, we're talking about grade school math, but your need to rely on the very entity in charge of the corruption speaks volumes about your credibility.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 01:31:55 PMHow are they meaningless when they followed all the proper procedures and did everything according to the book, and when their results match whats already been confirmed?
What procedures and what book did they follow? They went door to door, talked to about 4700 TOTAL people and, from that, determined that hundreds of thousands of votes are ghost/lost? They haven't provided and examples. They've provided two address that MIGHT be an issue, but even that isn't known for sure.
QuoteWrong. We would not trust them if they were lying or dishonest in any way because we only listen to facts and evidence. So if they changed their numbers then we would see it because it would not state reality, it would state a lie, thus we would know it wasnt true. But since we dont see that we know they are telling the truth.
If they changed their number
now, yes we would all notice. If, on the initial report, they literally doubled all of the ghost/lost votes, how would anyone know if was fake data? We wouldn't, because they've provided no specific examples beyond two addresses that aren't even for sure fraud. Remember, THEY changed their cover page.
QuoteI mean the full report is coming so we know they CANNOT lie. Your attacks on their credibility are meaningless.
I'm not attacking anything. All I've been pointing out is that people like you are taking their vague, unsupported report as gospel before any details have been provided.
QuoteBecause several reasons. 1) Acknowledging the steal to begin with. You cannot be impartial if you dont acknowledge that facts we already have proving the election was rigged. Thus ONLY THOSE WHO ACCEPT THE COUP HAPPEND can be trusted to do honest research further.
That is absolutely ridiculous. People who are biased in either direction should not be inherently trusted and this group is 100% biased. Not only that, they haven't provided any details on how they got from talking to 5k people to hundreds of thousands of problem votes.
QuoteThats called logical thinking.
2)She ISNT THE MSM or the GOVERNMENT. She is not on the side of the enemies of america and is a patriot. That gives her a mountain of credibility among most americans.
But they dont need too, their credibility has already been established. But dont worry, they will show the whole thing eventually, however adults can use their brains and dont need to wait for that before drawing conclusions.
Or confirmation bias.
QuoteFunny, from what you are saying it sounds like you wont believe the Audits preliminary reports either. If not then whats the point of preliminary reports at all?
What I'm saying, and have already said multiple times, is that this report is meaningless with out much, much more detail.
QuoteBut how could they have done that without lying? And we already know they arent lying, so what reason could you possibly have to suspect that when their findings only confirm whats already been proven?
How can you know they aren't lying when we have absolutely no details on the work they've done?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 11:05:45 AMWe don't know her abilities. She may be a great statistician...who just decided to get into real estate.
If I needed surgery, and a realtor offered to do it, I'd want her/him to prove they had the ability. I wouldn't just assume they did.
But she has already proven her ability and thats why most americans accept her findings.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 02:56:28 PMBut she has already proven her ability and thats why most americans accept her findings.
Until she provides details, so that all of the claims can be investigated, and provides the specifics of how she got to the numbers she has, we have absolutely no idea of her ability or honesty.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 02:09:54 PMWhat procedures and what book did they follow?
They followed the rules of doing canvassing, its like a science experiment, the rules are universal.
QuoteThey went door to door, talked to about 4700 TOTAL people and, from that, determined that hundreds of thousands of votes are ghost/lost?
Yes, taking a sample and applying it to the whole is called math, thats still a thing, LOL.
QuoteThey haven't provided and examples.
Why would they show example in the preliminary report? Those will all be in the main report, but since that is going to come out we can know they cant lie about them since OBVIOUSLY they would be found out and hoisted by their own petard! LOL try thinking, it works.
QuoteThey've provided two address that MIGHT be an issue, but even that isn't known for sure.
You have been unable to prove any discrepancies with the cover photo thus far...
QuoteIf they changed their number now, yes we would all notice. If, on the initial report, they literally doubled all of the ghost/lost votes, how would anyone know if was fake data? We wouldn't, because they've provided no specific examples beyond two addresses that aren't even for sure fraud. Remember, THEY changed their cover page.
So what? The examples will be in the main report OBVIOUSLY, thus they are unable to lie about the numbers. Massive fraud still confirmed. :biggrin:
:lol: :lol: :lol: Its not like people are out there trying to make up stuff in the hopes that it will remove biden.
Why would they? We can already prove scientifically that biden didnt win.
QuoteI'm not attacking anything.
Yes you are. You have an emotional investment in biden being legit, as you have proven by your unwillingness to look at any evidence. Thus you MUST attack anything that says otherwise. Its your TDS acting up. Go scream at the sky like other libbies, I hear that helps. :lol: :lol: :lol:
QuoteAll I've been pointing out is that people like you are taking their vague, unsupported report as gospel before any details have been provided.
But there is nothing vague or unsupported. You cant say that until you have the full report, until then you are only guessing it is unsupported or that the examples are bust. But since it will also be public you can KNOW 100% that the preliminary report is legit. Expect the left to file lawsuits anyways tho as they always use courts as a tool to slow things down.
QuoteThat is absolutely ridiculous. People who are biased in either direction should not be inherently trusted and this group is 100% biased.
BWAHAHAHA so now its biased to accept the proof that the election was stolen by massive fraud? Wow, so now living in reality is being biased.
Yes people who are biased shldnt touch this, which is just what I said, and the definition of not being biased is accepting the facts without emotional reasoning or anything not supported by evidence. Thats LITERALLY WHAT YOU ARE DOING HERE 😂, claiming, without evidence, that biden won, and inserting your emotional TDS hatred into the discussion. We on the other hand are providing mountains of evidence proving that we are not biased.
QuoteNot only that, they haven't provided any details on how they got from talking to 5k people to hundreds of thousands of problem votes.
Ummmm you didnt do well in high school math did you? Thats common knowledge. Everyone knows how they did it.
QuoteOr confirmation bias.
It cant be confirmation bias since its already been confirmed :lol: :lol: :lol:
QuoteWhat I'm saying, and have already said multiple times, is that this report is meaningless with out much, much more detail.
Wrong. Since we know that detail is coming we can know that they cannot lie. Thus we can know the report is accurate.
QuoteHow can you know they aren't lying when we have absolutely no details on the work they've done?
Because it would be the absolute height of stupidity for someone to lie about a report that everyone will soon see anyways. Only a libtarded person would make that mistake.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 03:07:15 PMUntil she provides details, so that all of the claims can be investigated, and provides the specifics of how she got to the numbers she has, we have absolutely no idea of her ability or honesty.
LOL yes we do. Is she part of the government or the MSM? No? Then she is automatically more trustworthy than the side parroting the MSM and government.
Add to that her acceptance of the facts to date and her obvious love of america and you can logically deduce she is honest and trustworthy in this regards.
(Add to that again that the final report is coming so she cant have lied)
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 03:07:15 PMUntil she provides details, so that all of the claims can be investigated, and provides the specifics of how she got to the numbers she has, we have absolutely no idea of her ability or honesty.
Kind of like when the democrats claim there was no fraud? You have noticed we have seen no proof from the democrats? Or you for that matter.
Quote from: T Hunt on September 16, 2021, 03:21:41 PMThey followed the rules of doing canvassing, its like a science experiment, the rules are universal.
Yes, taking a sample and applying it to the whole is called math, thats still a thing, LOL.
Why would they show example in the preliminary report? Those will all be in the main report, but since that is going to come out we can know they cant lie about them since OBVIOUSLY they would be found out and hoisted by their own petard! LOL try thinking, it works.
You have been unable to prove any discrepancies with the cover photo thus far...
So what? The examples will be in the main report OBVIOUSLY, thus they are unable to lie about the numbers. Massive fraud still confirmed. :biggrin:
:lol: :lol: :lol: Its not like people are out there trying to make up stuff in the hopes that it will remove biden.
Why would they? We can already prove scientifically that biden didnt win.
Yes you are. You have an emotional investment in biden being legit, as you have proven by your unwillingness to look at any evidence. Thus you MUST attack anything that says otherwise. Its your TDS acting up. Go scream at the sky like other libbies, I hear that helps. :lol: :lol: :lol: But there is nothing vague or unsupported. You cant say that until you have the full report, until then you are only guessing it is unsupported or that the examples are bust. But since it will also be public you can KNOW 100% that the preliminary report is legit. Expect the left to file lawsuits anyways tho as they always use courts as a tool to slow things down.
BWAHAHAHA so now its biased to accept the proof that the election was stolen by massive fraud? Wow, so now living in reality is being biased.
Yes people who are biased shldnt touch this, which is just what I said, and the definition of not being biased is accepting the facts without emotional reasoning or anything not supported by evidence. Thats LITERALLY WHAT YOU ARE DOING HERE 😂, claiming, without evidence, that biden won, and inserting your emotional TDS hatred into the discussion. We on the other hand are providing mountains of evidence proving that we are not biased.
Ummmm you didnt do well in high school math did you? Thats common knowledge. Everyone knows how they did it.
It cant be confirmation bias since its already been confirmed :lol: :lol: :lol:
Wrong. Since we know that detail is coming we can know that they cannot lie. Thus we can know the report is accurate.
Because it would be the absolute height of stupidity for someone to lie about a report that everyone will soon see anyways. Only a libtarded person would make that mistake.
You are simply too uninformed and/or to dishonest to have a reasonable discussion.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 04:08:32 PMYou are simply too uninformed and/or to dishonest to have a reasonable discussion.
This, from the kid caught lying. Now that's Rich. :glare:
Conservatives have no reason to lie, it's really that simple.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 03:07:15 PMUntil she provides details, so that all of the claims can be investigated, and provides the specifics of how she got to the numbers she has, we have absolutely no idea of her ability or honesty.
I warned you about burning through your free lie. You continue to double down. You get another time out.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/liz-harris-responds-maricopa-countys-bs-rebuttal-ghost-votes-lost-votes-misleading-public/
@p1tchblack, see you in 3 days.
Quote from: taxed on September 16, 2021, 04:34:32 PM@p1tchblack, see you in 3 days.
3 days ? It like taking him out for ice cream.
Hell two week did not help him. :lol: :lol:
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 16, 2021, 04:08:32 PMYou are simply too uninformed and/or to dishonest to have a reasonable discussion.
Thats what libbies usually say when they run out of MSM fake news to parrot to try and counter the truth. I guess your handler should give you a longer cheat sheet. Game, set, match.
Quote from: Possum on September 16, 2021, 03:28:57 PMKind of like when the democrats claim there was no fraud? You have noticed we have seen no proof from the democrats? Or you for that matter.
Great point. They say they need to see the details and we are STILL waiting to see ANY details confirming a biden win.
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:35:53 PMSomeone better tell realtor.com that the 21 pictures they have of a house at the address don't exist.
https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/13226-W-Beverly-Rd_Goodyear_AZ_85338_M20462-24192
Chuckle fat boy, you got busted lying again. Oh, and we have SOS with crow on the menu.
Liz Harris Responds to Maricopa County's BS Rebuttal On Ghost Votes And Lost Votes – Why Are They Misleading The Public?!Maricopa County immediately attempted to discredit the findings and the team of volunteers.
On September 10, Maricopa County released a statement titled "Maricopa County Recorder and Assessor Respond to Partisan Canvass Report".
In this report, the Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and the County Assessor Eddie Cook claimed that the address at 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave. in Tempe was not a vacant lot.
They used a five-year-old photo of the lot, when it had homes on it, to say "This property was a mobile home property through 2020″.
They failed to mention that the property was demolished prior to October 22, 2020, and the 2020 election.
Liz Harris responded to the county's absolute bogus report on Monday.
Harris obtained images from the Maricopa County Assessor's page dated October 22, 2020, which prove that the County is spewing falsehoods.
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/A73CD665-C773-4CA1-AB5E-08DE3784886A.jpeg)
Quote from: Solar on September 17, 2021, 05:39:49 PMChuckle fat boy, you got busted lying again. Oh, and we have SOS with crow on the menu.
Liz Harris Responds to Maricopa County's BS Rebuttal On Ghost Votes And Lost Votes – Why Are They Misleading The Public?!
Maricopa County immediately attempted to discredit the findings and the team of volunteers.
On September 10, Maricopa County released a statement titled "Maricopa County Recorder and Assessor Respond to Partisan Canvass Report".
In this report, the Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and the County Assessor Eddie Cook claimed that the address at 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave. in Tempe was not a vacant lot.
They used a five-year-old photo of the lot, when it had homes on it, to say "This property was a mobile home property through 2020″.
They failed to mention that the property was demolished prior to October 22, 2020, and the 2020 election.
Liz Harris responded to the county's absolute bogus report on Monday.
Harris obtained images from the Maricopa County Assessor's page dated October 22, 2020, which prove that the County is spewing falsehoods.
(https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/wp-content/uploads/A73CD665-C773-4CA1-AB5E-08DE3784886A.jpeg)
One of these days PB might see that the left lies about EVERYTHING.
Quote from: Possum on September 17, 2021, 06:12:58 PMOne of these days PB might see that the left lies about EVERYTHING.
I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen.
Quote from: Solar on September 17, 2021, 05:39:49 PMChuckle fat boy, you got busted lying again. Oh, and we have SOS with crow on the menu.
Liz Harris Responds to Maricopa County's BS Rebuttal On Ghost Votes And Lost Votes – Why Are They Misleading The Public?!
Maricopa County immediately attempted to discredit the findings and the team of volunteers.
On September 10, Maricopa County released a statement titled "Maricopa County Recorder and Assessor Respond to Partisan Canvass Report".
In this report, the Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and the County Assessor Eddie Cook claimed that the address at 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave. in Tempe was not a vacant lot.
They used a five-year-old photo of the lot, when it had homes on it, to say "This property was a mobile home property through 2020″.
They failed to mention that the property was demolished prior to October 22, 2020, and the 2020 election.
Liz Harris responded to the county's absolute bogus report on Monday.
Harris obtained images from the Maricopa County Assessor's page dated October 22, 2020, which prove that the County is spewing falsehoods.
Nice! Is that a single family, or more a multi-family home?
Quote from: taxed on September 17, 2021, 06:36:48 PMNice! Is that a single family, or more a multi-family home?
I guess some hobbits were living under the ground there?
Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:12:59 AMNot a good start for the report. They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released. Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.
https://canvass50.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/Maricopa-County-Canvass-Report-Final-090721.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2XkP-W5VrKoRx5ZLnWea05JQwvvnbhDuyl0uO4DdglxIrxc_cJVzH1904
https://www.google.com/maps/place/2058+E+Wildermuth+Ave,+Tempe,+AZ+85281/@33.412976,-111.8979887,3a,75y,2.72h,89.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQWJ8e2fGzeJL4Jivec-gYg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!4m5!3m4!1s0x872b085de5487a61:0xe900e14e18b5348c!8m2!3d33.4132248!4d-111.8979634
Quote from: tac on September 17, 2021, 06:20:56 PMI'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen.
Interesting isn't it? He found a home with the Marxist party of liars and thieves, the literal opposite of Conservatism.
How stupid he musty feel to always be wrong in every argument, morally and spiritually.
Quote from: taxed on September 17, 2021, 06:36:48 PMNice! Is that a single family, or more a multi-family home?
Like all votes for the left, they're just the dead voting, and here you are making fun of their houses.
Are you dead shaming again? :lol: :lol: :lol:
Quote from: Solar on September 18, 2021, 05:12:40 AMLike all votes for the left, they're just the dead voting, and here you are making fun of their houses.
Are you dead shaming again? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I can't help myself. I admit that I'm jealous of their big swimming pool in the bag yard.
Quote from: taxed on September 18, 2021, 01:40:29 PMI can't help myself. I admit that I'm jealous of their big swimming pool in the bag yard.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
I know, it literally dwarfs any Olympic pool on the planet, and that open air kitchen is to die for... OOPS, I didn't mean to "Dead Shame...
Quote from: Solar on September 18, 2021, 01:44:51 PM:lol: :lol: :lol:
I know, it literally dwarfs any Olympic pool on the planet, and that open air kitchen is to die for... OOPS, I didn't mean to "Dead Shame...
I wonder what type of asphalt they used for that driveway...
Quote from: taxed on September 18, 2021, 03:10:27 PMI wonder what type of asphalt they used for that driveway...
Since PB can see the house there, I wonder if he can see all the ponies too?
Quote from: American Exceptionalism on September 18, 2021, 03:13:30 AMhttps://www.google.com/maps/place/2058+E+Wildermuth+Ave,+Tempe,+AZ+85281/@33.412976,-111.8979887,3a,75y,2.72h,89.88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQWJ8e2fGzeJL4Jivec-gYg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192!4m5!3m4!1s0x872b085de5487a61:0xe900e14e18b5348c!8m2!3d33.4132248!4d-111.8979634
But but but....the MSMS told me theres a house there, so there is a house there!
Quote from: Possum on September 18, 2021, 03:53:48 PMSince PB can see the house there, I wonder if he can see all the ponies too?
Perhaps a pink elephant and flying pigs?
Unicorns!
Quote from: taxed on September 18, 2021, 03:10:27 PMI wonder what type of asphalt they used for that driveway...
Camo cement, looks just like the dirt and even matches the house paint.
Quote from: Solar on September 18, 2021, 07:00:51 PMCamo cement, looks just like the dirt and even matches the house paint.
Oh, they're using that sand-colored cement... the same one they used for the pool and the yard and roof.
Quote from: taxed on September 18, 2021, 08:27:05 PMOh, they're using that sand-colored cement... the same one they used for the pool and the yard and roof.
Yep, it really is cool, it's what all those alien bases are made of.
If there WAS a house that it probably had a smuggler tunnel from Mexico. Why ese would there be 196 people named Garcia living there..... :popcorn:
Quote from: Billy's bayonet on September 19, 2021, 04:26:04 PMIf there WAS a house that it probably had a smuggler tunnel from Mexico. Why ese would there be 196 people named Garcia living there..... :popcorn:
That would definitely explain it's demolition.