Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 02:11:23 PMAs Taxed pointed out, your original claim was BS.

I get them being wrong all the time and think it's adorable and entertaining, but outright lying is annoying.

Quote from: taxed on September 15, 2021, 02:34:08 PMI get them being wrong all the time and think it's adorable and entertaining, but outright lying is annoying.

It's all they have....

Quote from: taxed on September 15, 2021, 02:03:53 PMhttps://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1615

That was your freebie lie.  Next one you get another time out.

https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:12:53 AMThe document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it.  Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything.  They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.

How is almost 200,000 votes proven to have been added/subtracted from the count vague? Thats very specific.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:20:35 AMThey have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues.  They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples.  So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots.  If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.

You dont need specific examples. You dont get to comb over every single voter they canvassed. They did the work and here are the results. Unless you have any evidence to the contrary then this stand as public fact, that about 200,000 votes were added or subtracted from the actual count, aka massive fraud proven beyond any reasonable doubt. Youve lost the argument and have no leg to stand on. The left cheated, and thats that.
CLAIM CONFIRMED

I dont even need to show you that mountain of evidence anymore, I can just reference this to prove massive fraud and that biden didnt win.
Now this can be used to guarantee decertifying the states electoral votes.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:56:56 AMThe lot is 4+ acres.  Here's another, zoomed out pic from Google Maps, which anyone is able to use to view the home for themselves:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338/@33.374011,-112.344882,474m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!2s13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338!3b1!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548!3m4!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548

See, empty lot, case rested.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 03:03:11 PMhttps://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20

No you missed it, they said the building was destroyed 2020. Its not there now. You were caught lying. You lose.

Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:15:35 PMHow is almost 200,000 votes proven to have been added/subtracted from the count vague? Thats very specific.

It's not 200k. They only got about 5k responses, so they must have taken their limited findings and extrapolated them out across all votes. However, based on the two specific examples on their cover page, they yet to provide one legitimate, specific example.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:28:21 PMIt's not 200k. They only got about 5k responses, so they must have taken their limited findings and extrapolated them out across all votes. However, based on the two specific examples on their cover page, they yet to provide one legitimate, specific example.

Of course they extrapolated and thats still fact because thats how math and science works.

But more importantly you have no evidence that these two examples where wrong since we debunked you attempted lie.
So will you provide some legit evidence or will you retract your claim?

Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:25:06 PMNo you missed it, they said the building was destroyed 2020. Its not there now. You were caught lying. You lose.

It was a mobile home park and the registered voter had their mail forwarded for a year which, as the County Assessor stated, is legal.

Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:30:03 PMOf course they extrapolated and thats still fact because thats how math and science works.

But more importantly you have no evidence that these two examples where wrong since we debunked you attempted lie.
So will you provide some legit evidence or will you retract your claim?

I'll defer to the Maricopa County Assessor:

https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:31:43 PMI'll defer to the Maricopa County Assessor:

https://twitter.com/stephen_richer/status/1435739483408723969?s=20

So you defer to him when we already proved he is lying and that there is in fact no house there only an empty lot?
So you are willingly choosing the lie over the facts proven here by us?
Thats called TDS son, you have a mental disorder. Dont be willfully ignorant, follow the facts.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:30:22 PMIt was a mobile home park and the registered voter had their mail forwarded for a year which, as the County Assessor stated, is legal.

No sorry that cannot be true since the canvassers would have had that info and would have still canvassed the guy at his new location. So it seems again the assessor is lying. Typical govt official. Not surprised.
Sorry but you arent getting out of this one. 

Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 04:34:16 PMSo you defer to him when we already proved he is lying and that there is in fact no house there only an empty lot?
So you are willingly choosing the lie over the facts proven here by us?
Thats called TDS son, you have a mental disorder. Dont be willfully ignorant, follow the facts.

The house is right there. If a physical house existing isn't proof of a physical house existing, I can't help you.

The lot is over 4 acres. Do you expect there to be a four acre house so there's not unused space?

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 04:38:58 PMThe house is right there. If a physical house existing isn't proof of a physical house existing, I can't help you.

The lot is over 4 acres. Do you expect there to be a four acre house so there's not unused space?

Ummm you do realize google maps isnt live right? That house was destroyed. Its not there anymore as taxed said. The google maps pic is out of date.