Quote from: T Hunt on September 15, 2021, 08:43:38 AM      why are you using a cut manipulated photo? The real photo shows the empty lot, why dont you show that one instead of this edited one?

The lot is 4+ acres.  Here's another, zoomed out pic from Google Maps, which anyone is able to use to view the home for themselves:

https://www.google.com/maps/place/13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338/@33.374011,-112.344882,474m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!2s13226+W+Beverly+Rd,+Goodyear,+AZ+85338!3b1!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548!3m4!1s0x872b3bf2f2cac4c9:0x792e310f25edbb05!8m2!3d33.3739054!4d-112.3442548

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 08:27:42 AMMy point is that it's difficult to take this seriously when they can't even get accurate information on their cover page...after two tries.

No, what you attempted to do was invalidate the entire audit based on what you claim isn't accurate.
This is like throwing out the entire meal because a fly landed on a plate in the other room.

We don't know what the cover has to do with anything, nor do we care, like judging a book by its cover.
So here's your challenge. Prove the audit is a fraudulent document!

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 09:53:31 AMNo, what you attempted to do was invalidate the entire audit based on what you claim isn't accurate.
This is like throwing out the entire meal because a fly landed on a plate in the other room.

We don't know what the cover has to do with anything, nor do we care, like judging a book by its cover.
So here's your challenge. Prove the audit is a fraudulent document!

The document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it.  Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything.  They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:12:53 AMThe document provided isn't the final report, so I can't say if there's anything inaccurate about it.  Maybe they uncovered a major issue, but this preliminary report is too vague to verify anything.  They claim all kinds of issues, but provide no specific examples.

For example?

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 10:14:40 AMFor example?

They have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues.  They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples.  So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots.  If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:20:35 AMThey have 3 categories of issues: Lost Votes, Ghost Votes and Other issues.  They provide a description of the issue and an estimated number of incidents, but no specific examples.  So, despite getting them wrong, they provided specific addresses where (they believed) votes were cast from empty lots.  If the final report has specific examples (addresses, names, etc), then we have something to look at. Right now, it's all unsupported claims.

So casting votes from an empty lot, means it didn't happen?        

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 10:22:26 AMSo casting votes from an empty lot, means it didn't happen?        

Which one was an example of a vote being cast from an empty lot?

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 10:50:09 AMWhich one was an example of a vote being cast from an empty lot?

You tell me, you seem to want to claim to have all the answers. You've already dismissed it out of hand. So get to work, prove it's illegitimate.

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:02:13 AMYou tell me, you seem to want to claim to have all the answers. You've already dismissed it out of hand. So get to work, prove it's illegitimate.

I dismissed the two things that are dismissible: the two cover page claims of votes from empty lots.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 11:24:35 AMI dismissed the two things that are dismissible: the two cover page claims of votes from empty lots.

And did they find votes votes addressed to empty lots?

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:28:16 AMAnd did they find votes votes addressed to empty lots?

I don't know.  Like I said, the preliminary report provides no specifics. As of now, no, they haven't provided any legitimate examples of votes from empty lots.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 11:37:22 AMI don't know.  Like I said, the preliminary report provides no specifics. As of now, no, they haven't provided any legitimate examples of votes from empty lots.

So your initial claim was BS, is that what you're saying?

Quote from: Solar on September 15, 2021, 11:58:34 AMSo your initial claim was BS, is that what you're saying?

I don't believe so:

Not a good start for the report.  They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released.  Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 12:30:41 PMI don't believe so:

Not a good start for the report.  They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released.  Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.

https://t.me/CodeMonkeyZ/1615

That was your freebie lie.  Next one you get another time out.

Quote from: p1tchblack on September 15, 2021, 12:30:41 PMI don't believe so:

Not a good start for the report.  They already changed their cover page after their initial claim/picture of a vote coming from a supposedly empty lot was debunked in a matter of minutes after the report was released.  Old cover page had 2058 E. Wildermuth Ave in Tempe, AZ. New one has an address in Goodyear, AZ claiming (again) a vote came from an empty lot....which it didn't. A simple search on Realtor.com shows a house on the 4.3 acre lot.

As Taxed pointed out, your original claim was BS.

https://media.gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/085/068/618/original/76c7edcc0ab4ccea.mp4