Quote from: Solar on July 28, 2021, 11:35:20 AMNo!

https://thegoptimes.com/politifact-caught-in-major-lie-on-early-morning-ballot-dump/

The original Tweet that sparked the TCF riots was the exact video that is known to be the camera man. That's not even disputable.

Second, all ballots, even from the furthest corners of the state, are trucked in to a central location like TCF. They go through a number of checks and verifications before leaving, so it's not odd to have those trucks arriving late into the night.

This information was covered repeatedly. Gateway Pundit has no interest in doing anything but stirring the pot and getting clicks.

Why would the completely normally handling/processing of ballots require an investigation?

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 28, 2021, 01:52:22 PMThe original Tweet that sparked the TCF riots was the exact video that is known to be the camera man. That's not even disputable.

Second, all ballots, even from the furthest corners of the state, are trucked in to a central location like TCF. They go through a number of checks and verifications before leaving, so it's not odd to have those trucks arriving late into the night.

This information was covered repeatedly. Gateway Pundit has no interest in doing anything but stirring the pot and getting clicks.

Why would the completely normally handling/processing of ballots require an investigation?

You are describing the rules. We know them. The audit is finding out what happened. They are not the same.

Quote from: Possum on July 28, 2021, 01:57:34 PMYou are describing the rules. We know them. The audit is finding out what happened. They are not the same.

Michigan's audit is already done and there were no vans-full of fraud discovered.

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 28, 2021, 01:52:22 PMThe original Tweet that sparked the TCF riots was the exact video that is known to be the camera man. That's not even disputable.

Second, all ballots, even from the furthest corners of the state, are trucked in to a central location like TCF. They go through a number of checks and verifications before leaving, so it's not odd to have those trucks arriving late into the night.

This information was covered repeatedly. Gateway Pundit has no interest in doing anything but stirring the pot and getting clicks.

Why would the completely normally handling/processing of ballots require an investigation?

Because of proven fraud!
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/03/17/court-rules-michigan-secretary-of-state-broke-state-law-on-absentee-ballot-guidelines-before-2020-election/

Quote from: Solar on July 28, 2021, 03:44:48 PMBecause of proven fraud!
https://jonathanturley.org/2021/03/17/court-rules-michigan-secretary-of-state-broke-state-law-on-absentee-ballot-guidelines-before-2020-election/

Your linked article says:

There is no evidence that the violation of state law altered the outcome of the election

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 28, 2021, 05:28:31 PMYour linked article says:

There is no evidence that the violation of state law altered the outcome of the election

 However, the court found that Murray should not have issued the orders and, in doing so, violated the state's Administrative Procedures Act.

Quote from: Solar on July 28, 2021, 05:49:40 PMHowever, the court found that Murray should not have issued the orders and, in doing so, violated the state's Administrative Procedures Act.

Right. This goes back to my question in the election "Honesty" thread.... Are you ok with invalidating legal votes because the government potentially fucked up?

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 28, 2021, 05:55:48 PMRight. This goes back to my question in the election "Honesty" thread.... Are you ok with invalidating legal votes because the government potentially fucked up?

Did she not literally invalidate the votes of honest voters?

Genetski v. Benson, No. 20-216-MM in The Court of Claims For The State of Michigan
Show full title
Original Title:Genetski v. Benson, No. 20-216-MM in the Court of Claims for the State of Michigan
Uploaded byBreitbart News
Description:Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray rules Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated the Michigan Administrative Procedures

https://www.scribd.com/document/498855479/Genetski-v-Benson-No-20-216-MM-in-the-Court-of-Claims-for-the-State-of-Michigan#from_embed

Quote from: Solar on July 28, 2021, 07:20:12 PMDid she not literally invalidate the votes of honest voters?

Genetski v. Benson, No. 20-216-MM in The Court of Claims For The State of Michigan
Show full title
Original Title:Genetski v. Benson, No. 20-216-MM in the Court of Claims for the State of Michigan
Uploaded byBreitbart News
Description:Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray rules Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson violated the Michigan Administrative Procedures

https://www.scribd.com/document/498855479/Genetski-v-Benson-No-20-216-MM-in-the-Court-of-Claims-for-the-State-of-Michigan#from_embed

I couldn't get the PDF to download, so I looked up the case and found the article below. It sounds to me like the courts ruled that what she did was not legal. There were two things that the article mentioned specifically:  the change that she implemented should not be followed, in future elections and it's too late to do anything in regard to the November election.


https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 29, 2021, 06:19:26 AMI couldn't get the PDF to download, so I looked up the case and found the article below. It sounds to me like the courts ruled that what she did was not legal. There were two things that the article mentioned specifically:  the change that she implemented should not be followed, in future elections and it's too late to do anything in regard to the November election.


https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/

Nope, that's not how it works and everyone knows it. The law was broken, Period!
But none of this really matters, this is a burned out lightbulb in a room no one ever uses, in the big scheme of things.

We have them and there will be people going to prison, if not executed.

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 29, 2021, 06:19:26 AMI couldn't get the PDF to download, so I looked up the case and found the article below. It sounds to me like the courts ruled that what she did was not legal. There were two things that the article mentioned specifically:  the change that she implemented should not be followed, in future elections and it's too late to do anything in regard to the November election.


https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/15/judge-rules-secretary-state-bensons-ballot-signature-verification-guidance-invalid/4699927001/

Have you noticed all the ones involved in illegally changing the rules to vote were all liberals?

Quote from: Possum on July 29, 2021, 07:37:43 AMHave you noticed all the ones involved in illegally changing the rules to vote were all liberals Marxists?

FIFY

Quote from: Possum on July 29, 2021, 07:37:43 AMHave you noticed all the ones involved in illegally changing the rules to vote were all liberals?

That's not a coincidence.  Democrats are the party that tends to push to make voting as accessible as possible.

Quote from: Solar on July 29, 2021, 06:57:09 AMNope, that's not how it works and everyone knows it. The law was broken, Period!
But none of this really matters, this is a burned out lightbulb in a room no one ever uses, in the big scheme of things.

We have them and there will be people going to prison, if not executed.

It actually is how it works and the courts confirmed it. You can't change the rules, and invalidate votes, after the election is over any more than you could change NFL rules and retroactively change actual wins/losses.

Quote from: p1tchblack on July 29, 2021, 11:19:20 AMThat's not a coincidence.  Democrats are the party that tends to push to make voting as accessible as possible.

Please explain how "changing votes" equates to "accessible".