https://www.warhistoryonline.com/featured/recording-of-hitlers-normal-speaking-voice.html



Hitler talking in his everyday voice to Finnish military commander Mannerheim in 1942. The only existing recording of Hitler's normal voice.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClR9tcpKZec

Wow.  What a difference between his regular speaking voice and the screaming, hysterical voice he used to give speeches.  His natural speaking voice actually has a beautiful timber to it.  Very easy to listen to. 

Too bad his pleasant voice disguised a demonically ugly mind and spirit.

Thanks for sharing, Milos.  That was fascinating.  Have you had an opportunity to watch any of the documentaries on TV about the people who are researching their theory that Hitler never committed suicide, but instead snuck out of Germany and lived out the rest of his life in South America?

I would like to hear your opinion (and anyone else's opinion) about the documentary and the theory.   

Sue Ann

Hitler's wartime speeches are numerous and are available through on-line sources. Here's the Library of Congress link ALONE.....

http://www.loc.gov/audio/?q=adolph+hitler&all=true&st=gallery

Quote from: SueAnn on January 15, 2016, 08:19:04 PM
Wow.  What a difference between his regular speaking voice and the screaming, hysterical voice he used to give speeches.  His natural speaking voice actually has a beautiful timber to it.  Very easy to listen to. 

Too bad his pleasant voice disguised a demonically ugly mind and spirit. Are you talking about Obama?

Thanks for sharing, Milos.  That was fascinating.  Have you had an opportunity to watch any of the documentaries on TV about the people who are researching their theory that Hitler never committed suicide, but instead snuck out of Germany and lived out the rest of his life in South America?

I would like to hear your opinion (and anyone else's opinion) about the documentary and the theory.   

Sue Ann

Quote from: SueAnn on January 15, 2016, 08:19:04 PM
Thanks for sharing, Milos.  That was fascinating.  Have you had an opportunity to watch any of the documentaries on TV about the people who are researching their theory that Hitler never committed suicide, but instead snuck out of Germany and lived out the rest of his life in South America?

I would like to hear your opinion (and anyone else's opinion) about the documentary and the theory.   

Sue Ann

Yes, I had. And I believe it's true. There is no evidence Hitler and Eva have ever commited suicide, it was just a story invented by their SS bodyguards. Hitler and Eva were rescued by the British, and shipped to Argentina in a submarine. There, Hitler opened a chocolate factory.

Similar is with Heinrich Himmler, he was rescued to Cuba, and after he died, the Cuban Revolution was started in order to cover up the proofs of his existance there.

I suppose Hermann Goering was too large for submarine, lol, so he had to be tried.

Quote from: milos on January 17, 2016, 12:02:09 AM
There is no evidence Hitler and Eva have ever commited suicide, it was just a story invented by their SS bodyguards.

But what about the Russians who took their remains back to Russia?

QuoteHitler and Eva were rescued by the British, and shipped to Argentina in a submarine.

Eva, too?  I have only seen 1 episode of the documentary but I do not recall hearing anything about Eva escaping.  Is it possible that Eva was killed in the bunker and the skeleton the Russians took was hers?  DNA tests prove it was a woman.

QuoteThere, Hitler opened a chocolate factory.

I'll never look at Willie Wonka again the same.

QuoteSimilar is with Heinrich Himmler, he was rescued to Cuba, and after he died, the Cuban Revolution was started in order to cover up the proofs of his existance there.

This is new to me. How did you learn about this?

QuoteI suppose Hermann Goering was too large for submarine, lol, so he had to be tried.

Thank you for responding, Milos.

This is on the wrong forum. "Conspiracies," is better-suited.

Quote from: SueAnn on January 17, 2016, 01:35:41 AM
But what about the Russians who took their remains back to Russia?Eva, too?

Some dead couple was burned, but there was no evidence they were Adolf and Eva. As I know, Russians seeked for dead Hitler, found some dead Germans who looked similar to him, but were not satisfied.

Quote from: SueAnn on January 17, 2016, 01:35:41 AM
I have only seen 1 episode of the documentary but I do not recall hearing anything about Eva escaping.

Eva was rescued alongside with Adolf, but she divorced him later, because he was still making plans to come back to Germany and start all over again.

Quote from: SueAnn on January 17, 2016, 01:35:41 AM
I'll never look at Willie Wonka again the same.

I don't know who Willie Wonka was, but Hitler's chocolates were probably named "Uncle Dolf's Delight" or something like that. 

Quote from: SueAnn on January 17, 2016, 01:35:41 AM
This is new to me. How did you learn about this?

Lol, I am on internet since 2001, lots of stuff to find there, ha ha.

The claim is that SS actually stood for Sedes Sacrorum, that is the Vatican, so the Nazi V sign comes from it, too. Heinrich Himmler was a Jesuit, and the skull with bones is a Jesuit symbol as well as it was the SS symbol. Adolf Hitler was a Catholic. The original Holy Inquisition was founded to persecute Spanish Jews, and the Third Reich was a new Inquisition founded to persecute German Jews. That is why Vatican helped many of the Nazi officers to escape and hide into Latin America. Vatican has always hated the Jews. Although, some claim that the Zionists helped Hitler to persecute German Jews in order to settle Israel with Jews once again, there the story becomes complicated.

Quote from: quiller on January 17, 2016, 01:40:02 AM
This is on the wrong forum. "Conspiracies," is better-suited.

This was just a digression. But the official history is a greater conspiracy.

Thanks for sharing this, shows what appalling revisionism our current historians are forcing upon us. That Hitler and the High Command were maniacs and lunatics.

The most important fact that I had never read anywhere before was that the Russians had plans to invade Romania and get the essential strategic oil production, and that the Soviets were pushing the Germans for giving them more of Europe including Romania and Finland. What were the other demands? all of Poland? The Russians knew the Germans were bogged down in the west and therefore pursued their own expansion, this is wholly against the current historical paradigm that Stalin wanted peace and focus on internal dissent and was caught offguard by the nazis after the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

Another point is that Hitler is viewed as a moron and idiot for invading the Soviet Union and were completely unaware of the detrimental effects the weather would have. And the point about Soviet tanks, the current conservative prediction that the Soviets had 6500 tanks is a lot lower than what is thought today, and that the Soviets spend almost everything on armaments was considered a vile lie but today we know with North Korea and unclassified documents from Russia that this was in fact the case but this is not what is teached in schools.

Paradigm breaking video you have their Milos, I will certainly share this. Thanks.

Edit: And Finland is a existential threat to the Soviet Union because of morality? The true insane ones and lunatics are the communists... fucking hell, I don't even know how to describe this. You know Vidkun Quisling was a communist as a young man and worked for the red cross as a communist, it was during his time in the Soviet Union he came to despise communists but also developed a great appreciation for the efficacy of the Soviet Security state apparatus. Same with Reinhard Heydrich, the tactics and strategies he employed was the ones he learned from the NKVD.

Quote from: Mountainshield on January 26, 2016, 04:50:46 AM
Paradigm breaking video you have their Milos, I will certainly share this. Thanks.

You are welcome.

Quote from: Mountainshield on January 26, 2016, 04:50:46 AM
Edit: And Finland is a existential threat to the Soviet Union because of morality?

We have been taught in school that the Finnish border was very close to Leningrad, and so that was why the Soviets wanted to push it back.

Hitler was such an ASS.

He murdered millions of German Jews - the majority of who were GERMANS FIRST. Whose fathers and grandfathers fought valiantly and died for their country in WWI. And Albert Einstein would have been working for him - gladly.

Then he betrayed Stalin, who was ON HIS SIDE.

Were it not for those mistakes alone, he would have conquered and held the Continent.

Maybe Hitler really did have SYPHILIS. Is it possible he grew in power while he was sane, and by the time the disease took over it was too late to depose him ?

How sad such men were ever born.

Quote from: SalemCat on January 27, 2016, 08:09:08 PM

Then he betrayed Stalin, who was ON HIS SIDE.

Stalin was not on HIS side. USSR did everything to avoid war, everything it could to stop German naism in 30s,  but France and England did everything,  to star war. Of course, they thought Hitler would attack USSR first, but they failed. And later, these miserable fricks and loosers invented vile lie, that Hitler and Stalin the same, to cover their incompetence and evil.

Quote from: kalash on February 06, 2016, 01:54:01 AM
Stalin was not on HIS side. USSR did everything to avoid war, everything it could to stop German naism in 30s,  but France and England did everything,  to star war. Of course, they thought Hitler would attack USSR first, but they failed. And later, these miserable fricks and loosers invented vile lie, that Hitler and Stalin the same, to cover their incompetence and evil.

The interesting fact is that United Kingdom and France were those who actually started World War Two when they declared war on Germany for attacking Poland. And another interesting fact is why didn't they declare war on Soviet Union, too, for taking half of Poland. But taking half of Poland was just a bait for Stalin, and his huge mistake, because that way Soviet Union got border with Germany, which allowed Hitler to attack. Stalin should have kept Poland as a tampon zone to Germany. There is another claim, which officially goes into conspiracy theories, that United Kingdom promised to Hitler they will not interfere if Germany attacks Soviet Union, which gave Hitler more confidence in success. From the Hitler's recording in my original post, we can hear that Germany was not really ready for war.

Quote from: kalash on February 06, 2016, 01:54:01 AM
Stalin was not on HIS side. USSR did everything to avoid war, everything it could to stop German naism in 30s,  but France and England did everything,  to star war. Of course, they thought Hitler would attack USSR first, but they failed. And later, these miserable fricks and loosers invented vile lie, that Hitler and Stalin the same, to cover their incompetence and evil.

Quote from: milos on February 06, 2016, 12:43:42 PM
The interesting fact is that United Kingdom and France were those who actually started World War Two when they declared war on Germany for attacking Poland. And another interesting fact is why didn't they declare war on Soviet Union, too, for taking half of Poland. But taking half of Poland was just a bait for Stalin, and his huge mistake, because that way Soviet Union got border with Germany, which allowed Hitler to attack. Stalin should have kept Poland as a tampon zone to Germany. There is another claim, which officially goes into conspiracy theories, that United Kingdom promised to Hitler they will not interfere if Germany attacks Soviet Union, which gave Hitler more confidence in success. From the Hitler's recording in my original post, we can hear that Germany was not really ready for war.

But you can also hear that the USSR was ready for war and had been a war economy since the Civil War and never converted their factories back to civilian use, they continued to mass produce tanks/weapons and they were anxious for a war against Romania and change the status quo. And the statement that Britain and France did everything to start a war is ludicrous when you take all the facts of appeasement with the Anschluss and annexation of Czechoslovakia into consideration that statement is just emotional sophistry to advance your simpleton agenda of "Everything Soviet=Good".

Quote from: Mountainshield on February 10, 2016, 11:40:14 PM
But you can also hear that the USSR was ready for war and had been a war economy since the Civil War and never converted their factories back to civilian use, they continued to mass produce tanks/weapons and they were anxious for a war against Romania and change the status quo.

At that time, Soviets have held their elite troops on the far east, in expecting of an attack from Japanese. So Stalin wanted to do everything to avoid war with Germany at that time, because his western border was less protected. That was the moment Hitler decided to attack. It took Soviets months to transport their troops from the far east, but luckily on time to defend Moscow.

Regarding Romania, it was just Hitler's fear Soviets could have occupied their oil facilities. But since Stalin wanted to avoid war with Germany at that time, he certainly wouldn't have attacked Romania in order not to provoke Germany on war.