Author Topic: This Woman Just Does Not Get It.  (Read 231 times)

Offline supsalemgr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11377
  • Gender: Male
This Woman Just Does Not Get It.
« on: April 06, 2018, 08:32:52 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinion-why-i%e2%80%99m-suing-for-my-right-to-flip-off-the-president/ar-AAvwE36?li=BBnb7Kz

This is a perfect example of how the snowflake generation does not get it. The first amendment protects freedom of speech. She is perfectly free to give the president the finger. However, the first amendment does not remove personal responsibility for how one uses that freedom. I wonder if she understands the concept of consequences?
"If you can't run with the big dawgs, stay on the porch!"

Offline Rotwang

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 529
Re: This Woman Just Does Not Get It.
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2018, 10:11:04 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinion-why-i%e2%80%99m-suing-for-my-right-to-flip-off-the-president/ar-AAvwE36?li=BBnb7Kz

This is a perfect example of how the snowflake generation does not get it. The first amendment protects freedom of speech. She is perfectly free to give the president the finger. However, the first amendment does not remove personal responsibility for how one uses that freedom. I wonder if she understands the concept of consequences?

She's a Fool

Online Sick Of Silence

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 192
  • Militant Libertarian
Re: This Woman Just Does Not Get It.
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2018, 10:28:31 AM »
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/opinion-why-i%e2%80%99m-suing-for-my-right-to-flip-off-the-president/ar-AAvwE36?li=BBnb7Kz

This is a perfect example of how the snowflake generation does not get it. The first amendment protects freedom of speech. She is perfectly free to give the president the finger. However, the first amendment does not remove personal responsibility for how one uses that freedom. I wonder if she understands the concept of consequences?

Now, this is the same type of hypocritical Liberal who would have a fit if a Conservative flipped off Obama or either Clinton. We all know she would be screaming a different tune.

As we have seen in the past, who decides the consequences and what are those consequences? The CEO of Chic-Fil-A only said he supported traditional marriage and Liberals went holy war on him. Just look at Laura Ingraham and her comment. They are going holy war on her. We already have Conservative students being kicked out of colleges for saying jokes about immigration or whatever their so-called "crimes" are. We have business owners saying they don't want to serve a gay wedding and getting punished to death with outrageous fines and being force to go out of business.

I do think that there is a fine line between saying you don't like/hate your president and making direct death threats. I do think that there is less effect of some nobody in college and somebody who could reflect/effect the company/brand they work for. I do think that some clerk/technician has less of an effect that a middle management (or above). I do think that saying you support traditional marriage is tame but saying "F.U." with a hand gesture is going to far. I do think that there is a difference between moral criticism and legally punished by law or policy.

PS: We all know if it was a Conservative flipping off Obama, the Liberal media would go holy war on that person. Just look at what CNN did with the kid with the Trump "wrestling' meme.
Here is your first lesson about Free Speech...

...shut up about it!

 

Powered by EzPortal