Here is an excerpt from an edited manual on the subject of psychological manipulation of the population by Communist mind control experts. Does any of this sound familiar? Look at America in recent history and see if you can find examples of reprogramming to the authoritarian state, where one equals all.

The first is accomplished by a steady and continuous indoctrination of the individual in the belief that his previous loyalties have been granted to an unworthy source. One of the primary instances in this method, is to create circumstances that apparently derive from the target of his loyalties, so as to rebuff the individual. As a part of this, a state of mind in the individual can be created by actually placing him under duress and then furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is, itself, the cause of the duress. Another portion of this same method consists of defaming or degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be
changed from the target of his loyalties, (i.e., superiors or government), to such a degree that this target (either superiors or government) at length, actually does hold the individual in disrepute and so does rebuff him. This serves to convince him that his loyalties have been misplaced. These are the milder methods but they have proven extremely effective. The greatest drawback in their practice is that they require time and concentration, the manufacture of false evidence, and a psycho political operator's time.

Sheds a little light on the Obama Justice Department notion, never let a crisis go to waste, doesn't it?

A very good example of this is the Obama administration ongoing mission to nationalize urban cores, such as Baltimore, placing the residents under "new and effective authority" to replace the former, which, as Al Sharpton is quick to point out, is the reason for the misery, injustice, etc.  Can we identify the critical elements of stress that are required for the method to work most effectively?  What false evidence was presented in Ferguson and Baltimore to convince the residents that the "old" authority is responsible for the stress?
In Baltimore, note the complicity of the city authorities, ostensibly under the direction of Valerie Jarrett and the White House, to the point that it became almost funny to hear the mayor lashing out at the authorities that happened to include her own bad self!  The agenda is the main thing, and the left all knows the game.

Colleges are very good on brainwashing.  Even if you had no political views prior to going, they'll do their damnedest to get you to think like they want you to.

Rutgers University professor Brittney Cooper proclaimed that all black people are "one police encounter from the grave," and that white people must start lumping themselves together as " the face of the oppressor."

Rutgers Prof Says U.S. Is More 'Brutal' Than ISIS

Professor Salamishah Tillet said during a panel discussion on MSNBC that pro-lifers' opposition to late-term abortion is really about white-power racism.

Quote from: Dori on July 29, 2015, 05:20:06 PM
Rutgers University professor Brittney Cooper proclaimed that all black people are "one police encounter from the grave," and that white people must start lumping themselves together as " the face of the oppressor."

Professor Cooper's remarks are appropriate to the reference,
"furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is, itself, the cause of the duress. Another portion of this same method consists of defaming or degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be changed from the target of his loyalties, (i.e., superiors or government), to such a degree that this target (either superiors or government) at length, actually does hold the individual in disrepute and so does rebuff him. This serves to convince him that his loyalties have been misplaced."

This is how why come to the conclusion the Negro is the tool of the communist. Of course, that is a generality, but with so many blacks being exposed to this line of reasoning from the cradle to the grave, can there be any refuting that great numbers of black children enter school with the chip on? Rap music pounding the mantra of hatred into their brains. Who is the real enemy, the real reason? But of course, the Satanic communists. But like they say, New York, if you can make it there you can make it anywhere. Hang in there, blacks, rise above the chaff. Your problem is not the white middle class, regardless of what Prof Cooper tells you. In all honesty, though, don't look our way. That "white man's burden" crap went out with spats.

This is what's going down in Christie's home state. Are the people in New Jersey going to let it go down? I'd say, probably.

Thanks for your interest in this topic, Dori. Bear in mind, this material comes from notes from a debriefing of formerly classified Soviet material, unsubstantiated. Rather than to accept the usual challenges, the authors have chosen to rewrite and reformulate the content in such a way as to provide a kind of expose, a blowing of the whistle, as it were, on material promulgated through institutions such as the ones Barack Obama attended to receive advanced instruction. As it is, the impact should not exceed that which followed the revelation of the Cloward-Piven strategy and Obama's adherence.

There is more on the subject of loyalty. If you wish, I'll post comments on obedience. Simply indicate interest and I will.  These are two of the hallmark concepts of authoritarianism. Here is more on the topic of loyalty.

I probably should not be posting this, but since it seems to be "game on" with the Washington cartel, and others are sticking their necks out for us, I would feel negligent not to.

(In Washington, it is not unheard of, when operatives finally can take no more of the lies and hypocrisy, they volunteer for shock treatment. That is a rumor.)

If loyalty is so important in the economic and social structure, it is necessary to examine it further as itself. In this field, loyalty simply means "alignment". It means, more fully, alignment with the goals of the Communist State. Disloyalty means entirely misalignment, and more broadly, misalignment with the goals of the Communist State.
(Red_Dirt's note: Can't you just see this everywhere over the past seven years?)
When we consider that the goals of the Communist State are to the best possible benefit of the masses, we can see that disloyalty, as a term, can embrace Democratic alignment. Loyalty to persons not communist indoctrinated would be quite plainly a misalignment.
The cure of disloyalty is entirely contained in the principles of alignment. All that it is necessary to do, where disloyalty is encountered, is to align the purposes of the individual toward the goals of Communism. And then it will be discovered that a great many circumstances hitherto distasteful in his existence will cease to exist.
While it is not borne out that electric shock has any therapeutic value so far as making the individual more sane, it is adequately brought out that its punishment value will create in the patient a greater co-operative attitude. Brain surgery has no statistical data to recommend it beyond its removal of the individual personality from amongst the paths of organs that were not permitted to co-operate by that individual personality.
These two Russian developments — electric shock and brain surgery — have never pretended to alter the state of sanity. They are only effective and workable in introducing an adequate punishment mechanism to the personality. Punishment makes the personality cease and desist from its courses and its egotistical direction within the anatomy itself. It is the violence of the electric shock and the surgery that is useful in subduing the recalcitrant personality. Recalcitrant personalities are all that stand in the road of the masses or of the State. It is occasionally to be discovered that the removal of the preventing personality by shock and surgery then permits the re-growth and re-establishment of organs which have been rebelled against by that personality. In that a well-regulated state is composed of organisms, not personalities, the use of electric shock and brain surgery is clearly demonstrated to be effective.

If this is too much for the forum, just let me know.  I feel a little strange posting it, but I think the info has validity. This is all related to some of that exotic mind control that was all the rage during the height of the Soviet Union. Truth is, punks like Barack Obama, Bill Ayers, Michelle, and Valerie, have gotten themselves caught up in a fantasy world, identifying themselves with such historical figures as Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin. Truth is, Barack wouldn't make a pimple on Joe Stalin's ass. He's little more than a pampered Red Diaper, a Democratic fave, a passing fad.

Is there a link hidden in any of this?

Still, it is fascinating and instructive compare Washington strategy with what remains to be known as psychological mind control techniques of the former Soviet Union, associated with experiments by Pavlov, to ferret out the similarities.

Another fascinating link is through the Society of Jesus, but that can be another rabbit hole. That link takes us through Georgetown University and the doctrine of liberation theology, meaning liberation from nasty old capitalism and western industrial oppression by adherence to the mother Church/State, everyone equal, each according to his own needs.

The notes of the Soviet science are represented as from a debriefing of once classified Russian information that has gone through more than one translations. With Cloward Piven now common knowledge, including the knowledge of where that strategy is being taught, there can be little concern that quoting these Soviet programs could be of any embarrassment to anyone. The value, though, to us can be found in making the links and associations between the agenda and what is coming out of the Obama administration. Now I am thinking of the boldness of Eric Holder and that staff.

In the notes, we learn that when we find examples of this shock strategy being applied to foreign affairs, the agenda (obedience to the State) has already reached the advanced stages domestically.

Recently, with murmurs during the most recent Bush administration and more than murmurs during the Obama, is it not true that we have been hearing more and more of the "problem" of "dissidents" in America? Holdouts?
We know that is true. When, in our history, were flag waving patriots deemed a threat to the State, until recently? When were waves of immigrants, Catholic, non white, and Moslem, brought in with the understanding that they were part of the New Global population, soon to rule in the USA? This kind of thing is far from paranoid fantasy, it is openly reported. (see: Senator Harry Reid)

Quote from: Solar on July 30, 2015, 06:12:34 AM
Is there a link hidden in any of this?

No, I don't have any source on any of this. I wish I did, because it is fascinating information. My hunch is that it is fairly common knowledge in both intelligence circles and academic political science department circles in schools like Columbia and the University of Chicago.

I have become fascinated in the parallels between Obama's class and racial divisions and classic Soviet mind control. If it is deemed unreliable or inappropriate for the forum, just say so. Voice objections.  In the mean while, I will see if I can locate some authoritative published works on the topic. Hey,  communists have feelings, too, and deserve an unbiased representation of their ideas and strategies.

What we do find, though, is a lot of denial that there is such a thing as brainwashing and mind control, that the entire area is the stuff of science fiction and conspiracy buffoonery.   
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control

In fairness to Washington and the people of Missouri, can we really say that events in Ferguson did not unfold naturally, as a result of citizen indignation? Is it really fair to say any of the ensuing events, including the call to federalize the city on an ongoing basis, occurred as anything other than a predictable response? Other than the disparity of the findings  of the grand jury, in the Officer Darren Wilson inquiry, and the press reports of the same, is there really any evidence of disinformation, as the psychological strategy would prescribe? ** Demonstrators and the press called foul after the grand jury hearings were announced. These are examples. Are they isolated or coordinated?

** By that, is meant, exploit a crisis as an opportunity to transfer (or in the words of the strategy, translated as "realign") loyalty (to the city or state government) to the central authority. Local law enforcement is demonized, therefore loyalty and obedience is questioned by the citizens. The sight of Homeland Security troops on the streets of the city somehow has been transformed into a welcome sight, in the eyes of the citizenry, who, increasingly are seen as tools, dupes, fools.

Quote from: red_dirt on July 30, 2015, 06:19:51 AM
No, I don't have any source on any of this. I wish I did, because it is fascinating information. My hunch is that it is fairly common knowledge in both intelligence circles and academic political science department circles in schools like Columbia and the University of Chicago.

I have become fascinated in the parallels between Obama's class and racial divisions and classic Soviet mind control. If it is deemed unreliable or inappropriate for the forum, just say so.  In the mean while, I will see if I can locate some authoritative published works on the topic. Hey,  communists have feelings, too, and deserve an unbiased representation of their ideas and strategies.

What we do find, though, is a lot of denial that there is such a thing as brainwashing and mind control, that the entire area is the stuff of science fiction and conspiracy buffoonery.   
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_control

In fairness to Washington and the people of Missouri, can we really say that events in Ferguson did not unfold naturally, as a result of citizen indignation? Is it really fair to say any of the ensuing events, including the call to federalize the city on an ongoing basis, occurred as anything other than a predictable response? Other than the disparity of the findings  of the grand jury, in the Officer Darren Wilson inquiry, and the press reports of the same, is there really any evidence of disinformation, as the psychological strategy would prescribe? Demonstrators and the press called foul after the grand jury hearings were announced. These are examples. Are they isolated or coordinated?

You quoted a Professor Cooper, that requires a link in and of itself.
As to the commie connection to the obozo, the Dim party has been using commie tactics for nearly 100 years, the path was inevitable.
Just 50 years ago Congress warned what the commies were doing, in that they recognized the Communist Goals 1963.
I don't believe what they are doing is anything new, the only difference in today and 100 years ago, is they actually thought it was time to finish what they started.
They failed.

Quote from: Solar on July 30, 2015, 06:43:44 AM
You quoted a Professor Cooper, that requires a link in and of itself.
As to the commie connection to the obozo, the Dim party has been using commie tactics for nearly 100 years, the path was inevitable.
Just 50 years ago Congress warned what the commies were doing, in that they recognized the Communist Goals 1963.
I don't believe what they are doing is anything new, the only difference in today and 100 years ago, is they actually thought it was time to finish what they started.
They failed.

Exactly. Now the question is being raised, have they not given up on this revolutionary intent? Even though the implementation has been an utter disaster everywhere in the world it has been tried. Look at China, Thailand, and the Asian Rim, now. Gleefully capitalistic, openly (for the most part) texting one another, busy at the task of making this world a better place in which to live. Meanwhile, Russia and backwoods China are still stuck in BarackObamaLand, African slave states, and loving it.

That Prof. Cooper statement was Dori's. I thought it was an appropriate example of
how the left trains college students to "realign" loyalty; away from family, community, church, and government, to the mystical global collective. White culture, so to speak, becomes demonized. There is also the element of repetition, which is decidedly Pavlovian, Skinnerian, and Freudian.

The next in logic is to start the process of writing off New York and New Jersey as Communist enclaves, therefore, calling into question the wisdom of promoting those jurisdictions as business and financial, not to mention strategic geographical, centers.

I'm glad to find agreement this is all nothing new or should it come as a shock or surprise to anyone. It suggests the new board game or parlor pursuit:  find examples of communist mind control in the nightly news.

Evaluate policies of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in terms of what is known of Soviet mind control experiments of the 1950's. There's an essay question not likely to be found on this year's SAT. I might select the Iran Nuke Deal.

Quote from: red_dirt on July 30, 2015, 06:58:25 AMThat Prof. Cooper statement was Dori's. I thought it was an appropriate example of how the left trains college students to "realign" loyalty; away from family, community, church, and government, to the mystical global collective. White culture, so to speak, becomes demonized. There is also the element of repetition, which is decidedly Pavlovian, Skinnerian, and Freudian. Deal.

Using colleges, Hollywood, and the media is how they change the way people think.   The biggest problem for us today, is that many of the people pushing these agendas, are not aware that they have been brainwashed. 

Part of this was addressed by W. Cleon Skousen in his 1961 book; "The Naked Communist".  This has been achieved with the "Long March Through the Institutions".  The ACLU is an example as are the colleges.

This was told about by many, one being Yuri Bezmenov, regarding the Soviet plan of "Demoralization".  He said; 

Quote"According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85% is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is: to change the perception of reality of every American that despite of the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country.

It's a great brainwashing process which goes very slow and is divided into four basic stages. The first one being "demoralization". It takes from 15 to 20 years to demoralize a nation. Why that many years? Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students in the country of your enemy exposed to the ideology of [their] enemy.

Because the goal is to invoke a permanent transformation of the subjects,  the process is almost by necessity tedious.  There is nothing more savage and brutal than a massive air strike. However, once it is over and done with, the people come out of their bunkers, those still alive, with very much the same orientation as before the strike, though they might have learned a thing or two about messin'.  Not so with the deliberate and forever tactic of the Soviet mind control expert.

I'll paste in instructions concerning brutality and savagery, and summarize by noting the goal of the brutality is to invoke permanent change of attitude, decidedly from the independent and restless to the subservient and docile, as is the aim of any communist master. Strike a man once, he resists. Strike him the second time, he resists, but not as much as he did the previous strike.

Where do we see the perfect examples of this in practice? School yard bullying, flash attacks and beat downs, mob violence as Circle K in Akron, racial outburst and riots as is ongoing in Baltimore and Chicago. All are orchestrated and purposeful events.  We might even place the explanation for  Obama's seeming wanton disregard for the law and disregard of  the rights of Congress in this context. I've seen photos of top GOP officials, Boehner and McCain, actually hugging Obama. Biden is totally subservient. This is what life in Maryland will do for a man.

The war on police is a near perfect example. Not only are the "agents of change" encouraged to harass, humiliate, injure, even kill the law officer, the very institutions in place to support the law, the courts, judges, and lawyers, have been co-opted by the authoritarian forces so as to keep the law men constantly on guard should one find himself in court. One very successful attack was planting evidence against the police. Another is charging the officer with hate bias. All false, all effective.   Here is an excerpt concerning savagery and physical assaults.  Bear in mind, these strategies were in place in the 1950's, well before the destruction of South Africa and the United States were underway.


Concurrent with force is brutality for there are human considerations involved that also represent force. The most barbaric, unrestrained, brutal use of force, if carried far enough, invokes obedience. Savage force, sufficiently long displayed toward any individual, will bring about his concurrence with any principle or order.

Force is the antithesis of humanizing actions. It is so synonymous in the human mind with savageness, lawlessness, brutality, and barbarism, that it is only necessary to display an inhuman attitude toward people to be granted by those people the possession of force.

Any organization that has the spirit and courage to display inhumanity, savageness, brutality, and an uncompromising lack of humanity, will be obeyed. Such a use of force is, itself, the essential ingredient of greatness. We have at hand no less an example than our great Communist Leaders. In moments of  duress and trial, when faced by Czarist rule continued over the heads of an enslaved populace, they displayed sufficient courage never to stay their hands in the execution  of the conversion of the Russian State to Communist rule.

Quote from: red_dirt on July 30, 2015, 12:45:17 PM
The war on police is a near perfect example. Not only are the "agents of change" encouraged to harass, humiliate, injure, even kill the law officer, the very institutions in place to support the law, the courts, judges, and lawyers, have been co-opted by the authoritarian forces so as to keep the law men constantly on guard should one find himself in court.

This is not to overlook the cooperation of local leaders. Recent activity of the office of the mayor of Baltimore is a perfect example, aid and abet. The office of the mayor of the city of New York is ongoing further evidence.
From the notes, there are a couple of excerpts that will be helpful to anyone interested in an overview of the Soviet mind control strategy. I will reproduce a valuable overview
below after making it clear that life and science has changed in the sixty years since the Soviets actively used the fundamental techniques to subdue the population, and the ninety or so years the Nazis did the same thing. Today, the brutality, the camps, the torture, is a memory, unless we want to account for Islam.

-----------------------------------------------

The subject of Soviet mind control breaks down into several categories, each naturally and logically proceeding from the last. Its first subject is the constitution and anatomy of Man, himself, as a political organism. The next is an examination of Man as an economic organism, as this might be controlled by his desires. The next is classification of State goals for the individual and masses.

The next is an examination of loyalties. The next is the general subject of obedience. The next is the anatomy of the stimulus-response mechanisms of Man. The next is the subjects of shock and endurance. The next is categories of experience. The next is the catalyzing and aligning of experience. The next is the use of drugs. The next is the use
of implantation. The next is the general application of mind control within Russia. The next is the organization and use of counter-mind control. The next is the use of mind control in the conquest of foreign nations. The next is organizations outside Russia, their composition and activity. The next is the creation of slave philosophy in a hostile nation. The next is countering anti-mind control activities abroad. And the final one, the destiny of Soviet mind control rule in a scientific age. To this might be added
many subcategories, such as the nullification of modern weapons by psycho political activity.

Red_Dirt, you keep pulling out excerpts from and "edited manual on the subject of psychological manipulation of the population by Communist mind control experts."  Could you please provide the full reference information for this manual?  Is it available online, or through libraries, or what?

No, I received the notes by email from a personal friend. I think it is one of those emails that circulates.  Come to find out, most of the information in that formerly classified debriefing is now part and parcel of historical documentation of those mind control principles popular in the Soviet Union since the 1950's.  Dori made reference to Skousen's "The Naked Communist," and Solar concedes that, while the accuracy of the posts can not be guaranteed, the general ideas have been kicked around the freedom loving community for a long time.  Then, of course, there is Cloward-Piven for the Obama generation. Sorry I cannot be of further assistance on this.

What I am doing here really is to encourage people, especially Milennial, Snowflakes, and those in a position to influence them, to review this info and get up to speed on the agenda, creation of the robotic masses by any means necessary, and benchmark their analyses with the premise that these SOB's have not given up yet. To the contrary, it seems they have infiltrated while our guard was down. My goodness, just look at the spread of Islamics in institutional and government positions in our country just since 2008. In Europe, it is even worse.

Russia denies everything. Obama denies all. All technology advances. This stuff is based on Freud, Pavlov, and ageless military brutality. Our people must figure out 21st century applications most of us live in unawareness of.

There are dozens of resources, none of which is accuracy guaranteed. Search.
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/mind_control_index.htm
Ignorance is bliss. Taking the mystery out of America's Democratic Socialism, Bernie Sanders' term, not mine. Taking the mystery out of the Obama agenda.
How many perceive the so called "race riot" as calculated strategy to weaken American morale? At the time the riots are occurring, the media pounds us with accusations of racism, white bigotry, and self hatred. Text book mind control with clever century 21st innovations.

Quote from: zewazir on July 31, 2015, 07:58:42 AM
Red_Dirt, you keep pulling out excerpts from and "edited manual on the subject of psychological manipulation of the population by Communist mind control experts."  Could you please provide the full reference information for this manual?  Is it available online, or through libraries, or what?

It's on Amazon.


The Soviet Art of Brain-Washing: Communist Psychopolitics and the Slaughter of Western Culture Paperback  – September, 1979

by Kenneth Goff   (Author)