Conservative Political Forum

Why are old fashion women hot?

Because they are much more feminine?

I was born some three decades late after my proper time. God, why oh why (do you hate me)?...

Are you one of those classy broads?

I bet you were hot-to-trot with your saddle shoes.

 

Good find. She is absolutely Correct! The left destroyed our culture by creating the Feminist movement.
That's Right,, all that far back, but it wasn't until the 60s they really started to push for a greater division in the sexes, as we see them doing with race/ethnicity/religion, etc.
Destroying the bond between an and woman, killing off centuries proven matrimonial bonds between the sexes destroys culture.

I have faith we will see a resurgence of values because people naturally gravitate toward structure.

Exactly. There have been many women who denounce feminism or follow a more toned down version of true feminism. It's these radicals on the left who create more division then unity.

You'd be surprised at the amount of women that have told me, giving them the vote was a fatal mistake, because women by nature change their minds based on emotion several ties a month on a given issue, all based on emotion. Not until menopause they claim should they be allowed to vote.
Not my words, but from older thinking women.

She was right about a lot of things.  Times change.  Customs change.  But even today the basic rule applies.  A man will treat a woman with as much respect as she demands.

That's a funny thing... I am a redneck boy, so maybe it is just in my upbringing, but a woman, standing in her honor is nearly unassailable... And worthy of every aid and comfort.

Old school Southern gals have that thing down pat, and as big and powerful as I am, I have been rendered powerless by ladies standing perfectly in their honor, politely dressing me down, leaving me hat-in-hand, digging a toe in the ground, muttering 'yes ma'am'.

It is nearly a Pavlovian effect - And why women gave that up to be as boorish as men just boggles my mind.

And that has deep, deep tentacles into culture. I live in a very wild land, and I have more than once stood guard in pouring rain, or bitter cold over another man's woman or daughter, hopelessly broken down on the side of the road, making sure she remains safe until her menfolk come to fetch her up... Without that duty, impressed upon me since youth, what happens to those stranded women? Who even stops anymore to help them without some advantage in mind? And it is not just her honor at stake, but that of her father and/or husband - It intersects all of society in the end. Now I can only hope for such a one to be wandering by to help my wife or daughter.

Wear a Bailey, a big shiny buckle and a pair of sh*tkickers, just about anywhere in the West, and it is still, to this very day, advertising the fact that you will help women in need, whether a busted car, toting some load, or outright protection...

But it is going away, surely it is... Because women have broken that sacred trust, not men.
In the end, men will build for women the society they want, because that is what society is for.
As you said, choose wisely.

Good find.

Yeah, please do check her channel, she is absolutely adorable, and especially with that "woman Stallone" accent.



There are several different issues here. First of all, it is a question of the culture vs. the nature. Should the human race form a culture, or it should just be natural and follow the natural instincts. Modern human race is leaning towards naturality, and so it becomes more and more animalistic, that is why we have this hypersexualization of the society. But on the other side, Christianity for example teaches us to overcome the nature and become holy. That is why modern society hates Christianity, because modern society worships the nature, and it is all about being physically healthy, living a healthy lifestyle, eating healthy food, having healthy sex, loving animals, etc, etc. But on the other side, to be holy means to be different, to separate one's self from the nature and the natural instincts, not to become deviant like the leftists, but to become better than the nature, to become more like God. But for the modern society, nature is God, and true God is erased. So, centering one's life on living a healthy lifestyle, or not caring for the health and being body positive, are just two sides of the same medal. To be holy means something different, because all natural things die and rot, but holiness lives forever with God in eternity.

It is also obvious that a woman-centered matriarchal society leads to being natural, because women are like that, it is in their nature to be materialistic, they are those who are carrying and delivering babies and cooking for them etc, to be a mother means to have a strong physical connection with the children. On the other side, a man-centered patriarchal society leads to being spiritual, because men don't have such a strong physical connection with their children, and to be a father is mostly a spiritual thing. And therefore, we can realize the connection between worshipping the nature and being feminist and hating Christianity, but also being materialistic, which again leads to Marxism and the political left.

Women tend to evaluate and judge and label men all the time, which is difficult for a man to understand, at least for me, because I never judge anyone, it is just if I like them or not. Now, the question is: on which premise will a woman judge a man, on the premise of being natural, or on the premise of being cultural? Our grandparents have been raised to be cultural, and so being a gentleman or a lady was a crucial thing for the social life, a gentleman will appreciate a lady, and a lady will appreciate a gentleman. But nowadays, with this nature worshipping society, the crucial thing for the social life is being animalistic, being a male or a female rather than being a gentleman or a lady. And so, the main thing is to be an alpha male or alpha female for more successful mating. That is why modern women prefer "bad boys" over "good guys", although I couldn't agree with those labels of "alpha" and "beta" or "bad" or "good", they are ridiculous. Actually, they would rather prefer to have both at the same time, that is a "good guy" who acts like a "bad boy", so that they have both protection and fun at the same time.

Sorry, but I have always been a Christian in my heart, I see human relationships as communication among two souls, and if I truly do care for a woman, I will certainly never treat her as a bad boy, it is impossible. That is probably why I have misfortune with women. I don't know, I am a Christian gentleman, and not an alpha or beta or whatever male, and I want a Christian lady for a loving relationship, and not a female for mating. But the moment I look a woman, she immediately assumes I want sex with her, like there is no other kind of relationship but mating with each other. And if I say to a woman that she is very pretty, that certainly doesn't mean I want to jump on her immediately, like they assume. I see young generations just talk about sex and who is screwing with who, a bunch of male and female whores. One of the main human fears is that of being ostracised from the community, that is why probably the majority always tend to swim down the stream.

So, MGTOW or don't?