Conservative Political Forum

One of the best answers regarding the 2nd I have ever seen. 

I noticed Midcan never came back to this thread.

pretty typical of him, throws crap against the wall and runs. Never knows what stuck or not. I guessing he sees himself as well educated, not my opinion of him.

Well he can copy and past. 

Well he can copy and past.

Guess they teach that in school now.

I think it falls under basket weaving 102.

Hah! That would be an actual skill, schools are adverse to kids actually learning something useful.

As you may recall a past muslim president said;  Long before he was president, Barack Obama was already plotting to overturn the Constitution of the United States. In a chilling 2001 public radio interview, Obama said the Constitution was a “charter of negative liberties,” full of constraints imposed upon us by our Founding Fathers.

The 2nd amendment to me meant that the people have their right to bear arms equal to and better than a tyrannical government or the standing army thereof.

Contrary to Hiden, it's not about hunting geese or deer.  It's about our God given rights and freedoms.

If a tyrannical government, or it's standing army has a machine gun, then I have the right to have a machine gun.  There were no restrictions, types of firearms or quantity, contained in the 2nd amendment.  The government has no right to limit my rights as to the type of arms I may choose to have.

It seems that the tyrannical government, faced with these restrictions, fall back to congress having the right to tax.  So, they decide to tax a particular weapon, magazine or ammunition.  These taxes can be unlimited except by the constraint imposed by the opposite party during the legislation of the bill.

The current democrap party would like to impose a tax on rifles built on the AR platform, $300 per rifle.  Also, a tax on high capacity magazines.  Just as the political hack Roberts did on the ACA, calling it a tax for a penalty, the same will be held true on the democraps attempt to price the ownership of AR platform rifles to the point that the common man, conservatives, can't afford to pay.

The left will unleash a monster with a resolve the likes of which they can not believe.  I'm coming, and I'm bringing Hell with me.

If someone is wealthy enough to afford all of the taxes, fees and costs associated with owning a machine gun, (ammo, cost of the weapon itself, etc.), then more power to them. I don't find there being a limit on how many knives, hammers, sledge hammers, saws, cars, etc. one can afford or own, why would there be a limit on firearms?