Question for any Liberal who comes here:

Started by Sick Of Silence, May 30, 2019, 12:01:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kentucky_Conservative

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 30, 2019, 08:48:21 AM
Yep, you are a Liberal. Please come back if and when you understand things.

WHO is a liberal?  Did you reply to a response that was deleted, because the first reply by alienhand is not what I would define as "answers from a liberal."

Solar

Quote from: Kentucky_Conservative on November 05, 2019, 07:11:55 AM
WHO is a liberal?  Did you reply to a response that was deleted, because the first reply by alienhand is not what I would define as "answers from a liberal."
Alienhand is a liberal leech. He has a ton of other posts, Sick was just cutting him off at the knees.  Alien was notorious for derailing threads and making them all about himself.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

tiny1

midcan5
QuoteThe only sites I have been banned from are so called conservative sites. Redstate was the first and I was trying hard not to offend but back then I was a bit more outspoken.

Never been banned.  Left forums on my own, because I disagreed with the Admin.  But, I have friends who were banned from liberal sites, for no reason save it be for speaking the truth.


QuoteBut back on topic, 'hate speech' is a problem as there are many people in this world who take these words seriously and too often act on them. I have no problem with Laura Ingraham giving hateful people the microphone but make sure there is a counterpoint. Challenge them, contradict them when they lie, etc etc.
I laugh when Liberals spew "Hate Speech" nonsense.   Nothing, and I mean NOTHING you can say will hurt me.  Why?  Because, being a conservative, I couldn't give John Brown's Hind Parts" what a liberal, or anyone, thinks of me.  Sticks and Stones, and if someone had "Stones" to begin with, they'd not whine and cry when someone spoke harshly to them.  Because you liberals are making such a big deal, those being bullied take their own lives.  When I was a kid, if you had bully issues, you punched 'em in the nose. 
Quote"Propaganda must facilitate the displacement of aggression by specifying the targets for hatred." Joseph Goebbels
NAZI PROPAGANDA MINISTER?!?!?!  Are you effing kidding me?  I'll not degrade myself by even answering that stupidity.
Quote"Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life. Thus people haunted by the purposelessness of their lives try to find a new content not only by dedicating themselves to a holy cause but also by nursing a fanatical grievance." Eric Hoffer
Philosophical Bafflegag.
The First Amendment does not say or imply that you, as a person, can say whatever you wish to me, and I have to take it.  In fact, if you insulted my wife and/or kids, I'd not call it hate speech, I'd call it a Death Wish.   But at the very least, I'd have lots of what you call Hate Speech, for you to feast on.   
That said, the First Amendment applies only to the Gooberment.  They cannot silence us, jail us, or retaliate against us, for speaking our minds.  I have Freedom OF Religion, you don't have Freedom FROM Religion.  And, Sticks and Stones may Break my Bones, but Words Never can Hurt me.
So, in a Nutshell, there is no such thing as Hate Speech.  Blunt hurtful speech is just that.  Next thing you know, you liberals will be arresting people for Thought Crimes, ala Minority Report.
Y'all need to grow a collective pair.

Sick Of Silence

Conservatives also understand moral side of the Freedom Of Speech. We don't typically go up to people's faces and shout at them, nor would we do it when the situation doesn't call for it.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Mercy Otis Warren

Quote from: tiny1 on November 05, 2019, 10:22:37 AM
midcan5 Never been banned.  Left forums on my own, because I disagreed with the Admin.  But, I have friends who were banned from liberal sites, for no reason save it be for speaking the truth.

I laugh when Liberals spew "Hate Speech" nonsense.   Nothing, and I mean NOTHING you can say will hurt me.  Why?  Because, being a conservative, I couldn't give John Brown's Hind Parts" what a liberal, or anyone, thinks of me.  Sticks and Stones, and if someone had "Stones" to begin with, they'd not whine and cry when someone spoke harshly to them.  Because you liberals are making such a big deal, those being bullied take their own lives.  When I was a kid, if you had bully issues, you punched 'em in the nose.  NAZI PROPAGANDA MINISTER?!?!?!  Are you effing kidding me?  I'll not degrade myself by even answering that stupidity.Philosophical Bafflegag.
The First Amendment does not say or imply that you, as a person, can say whatever you wish to me, and I have to take it.  In fact, if you insulted my wife and/or kids, I'd not call it hate speech, I'd call it a Death Wish.   But at the very least, I'd have lots of what you call Hate Speech, for you to feast on.   
That said, the First Amendment applies only to the Gooberment.  They cannot silence us, jail us, or retaliate against us, for speaking our minds.  I have Freedom OF Religion, you don't have Freedom FROM Religion.  And, Sticks and Stones may Break my Bones, but Words Never can Hurt me.
So, in a Nutshell, there is no such thing as Hate Speech.  Blunt hurtful speech is just that.  Next thing you know, you liberals will be arresting people for Thought Crimes, ala Minority Report.
Y'all need to grow a collective pair.


Yeah....wish we could apply the 1st amendment to all the social media sites...
The secret of FREEDOM lies in educating people, whereas the secret of TYRANNY lies in keeping them ignorant.   ~Maximilien Robespierre

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Mercy Otis Warren on May 07, 2020, 10:24:01 AM

Yeah....wish we could apply the 1st amendment to all the social media sites...

I think it should. Just because they found a way to monopolize and monetize a social media avenue, it is not a private company. It is the modern printing press, and we will not get permission from the King.

If we are going to treat it like a private company, then they have to serve us our (wedding) cake so to speak.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2020, 12:43:20 PM
I think it should. Just because they found a way to monopolize and monetize a social media avenue, it is not a private company. It is the modern printing press, and we will not get permission from the King.

If we are going to treat it like a private company, then they have to serve us our (wedding) cake so to speak.
Any restrictions placed on them would have to be Federally mandated. That would be in direct violation of the First.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Calypso Jones

QuoteHere is my definition.  Hate Speech is defined as speech that is not based in logic, truth, reason or facts.  If you have your speech or what not then present your reasoning behind it.


our founders did not specify between hate speech and love speech if you will.
As we have seen, hate speech is in the eye...or rather the ear of the beholder.   It's like hate crimes.  You see how well that's worked.   No leftist is usually charged with an actual hate crime as defined in the law.   It was designd by the left to catch conservatives but they only succeeded in hamstringing themselves.  It's that pesky Law of Unintended Consequences.
Trump Won

Anti Social Distancing

Defund Police....start with former presidents' secret service.

supsalemgr

Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 07, 2020, 01:30:47 PM

our founders did not specify between hate speech and love speech if you will.
As we have seen, hate speech is in the eye...or rather the ear of the beholder.   It's like hate crimes.  You see how well that's worked.   No leftist is usually charged with an actual hate crime as defined in the law.   It was designd by the left to catch conservatives but they only succeeded in hamstringing themselves.  It's that pesky Law of Unintended Consequences.

In my view hate speech and hate crimes are ridiculous. Only God and the individual know if an act by a person is because of hate.
"If you can't run with the big dawgs, stay on the porch!"

Possum

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2020, 12:43:20 PM
I think it should. Just because they found a way to monopolize and monetize a social media avenue, it is not a private company. It is the modern printing press, and we will not get permission from the King.

If we are going to treat it like a private company, then they have to serve us our (wedding) cake so to speak.
Not sure what you are saying here, I am in the camp that a private, or publicly owned business can do as they want. If they do not want to make a cake or any product that goes against their beliefs, then they do not have too. Its their business. I would not ask a church to allow anyone to speak who goes against their beliefs either. By the same token, if you start a conservative newspaper and it grows to be number one, can a bunch of leftists force you to let them have space on the editorial page against your will?

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Possum on May 09, 2020, 05:37:16 PM
Not sure what you are saying here, I am in the camp that a private, or publicly owned business can do as they want. If they do not want to make a cake or any product that goes against their beliefs, then they do not have too. Its their business. I would not ask a church to allow anyone to speak who goes against their beliefs either. By the same token, if you start a conservative newspaper and it grows to be number one, can a bunch of leftists force you to let them have space on the editorial page against your will?

They already set the tone: since they went after the baker, they set the standard that a private company can not deny service. Period.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 09, 2020, 06:44:55 PM
They already set the tone: since they went after the baker, they set the standard that a private company can not deny service. Period.
SCOTUS said otherwise. Every case that made it to the court was thrown out as unconstitutional. Any business sued now when win, precedent has been set.
What's sad is it even made it to a lower court in the first place. It should have been tossed with prejudice.
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

Calypso Jones

Quote from: supsalemgr on May 08, 2020, 05:27:35 AM
In my view hate speech and hate crimes are ridiculous. Only God and the individual know if an act by a person is because of hate.

agree.  We have laws for this.  you either broke it or you didn't.
Trump Won

Anti Social Distancing

Defund Police....start with former presidents' secret service.

walkstall

Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 09, 2020, 07:12:59 PM
agree.  We have laws for this.  you either broke it or you didn't.

OK at what point is a hate crime and hate crime?  As some one said ONLY God knows!
A politician thinks of the next election. A statesman, of the next generation.- James Freeman Clarke

Always remember "Feelings Aren't Facts."

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Solar on May 09, 2020, 06:56:04 PM
SCOTUS said otherwise. Every case that made it to the court was thrown out as unconstitutional. Any business sued now when win, precedent has been set.
What's sad is it even made it to a lower court in the first place. It should have been tossed with prejudice.

Regardless if it was overturned, they set the tone. If they had ignored the baker situation, then they would have the moral stance on private companies.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.