https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/cosmic-bubble-hypothesis-highlights-another-big-bang-problem/




Notice what is going on here. The data disagree with the model, so the data must be wrong. This is the reverse of the way that science is supposed to work. But it is an example of an all-too-common attitude that has been rampant in cosmology for decades. (and not just the science field but political and medical) It's often been said in cosmology circles that data should never get in the way of a good model. Also notice that there is no evidence for this bubble. Far too many people apparently think that the necessity of the bubble to salvage the model is evidence for its existence. Again, this is not how science is supposed to work.

Such rescuing devices have been par for the course in cosmology for decades. As problems have arisen, cosmologists have invoked all sorts of hypothetical things, such as inflation, to fix the problems. Though there is no evidence for these rescuing devices, cosmologists are convinced that these rescuing devices must be true, or else the big bang model would be wrong. The reasoning is that since the big bang model must be true, then it follows that anything the big bang model requires must also be true. It never occurs to most scientists that the big bang model may not be true. There is a word for this attitude. That word is dogmatism.

Interesting!
Hence the claim of AGW, based on bad data but propped up by Marxist dogma using false models to fool the ignorant.

They proclaim "But the models don't lie", as we retort, the models are based on lies.

This seems to be a common tactic.

Quote from: Calypso Jones on May 09, 2020, 03:35:30 PM
This seems to be a common tactic.

Agree! Science follows the facts, it does not create it's own.