Friends of CPF

Dissecting Leftism - Grouchy Old Cripple - John C. Drew - NewsBlaze - NewsRabble - Rebel Pundit - Right Wing News - Ritely

Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
An organizer for the annual Burning Man festival in Nevada has decided to take the party to Cliven Bundy’s ranch for a 30-day, rules-free “Bundyfest.”

Liberal activist Sean Shealy said the festival will be held across the road from Mr. Bundy’s ranch in Bunkerville for 30 days beginning Sept. 5 and will feature more than 250 bands, Raw Story first reported.
The event appears to blatantly mock the defiant rancher, who has engaged in a long-term battle with the Bureau of Land Management over unpaid federal grazing fees.

“For years, we paid permitting fees to hold Burning Man on the beautiful Playa in Northern Nevada,” reads the Bundyfest Facebook page. “But now, Cliven Bundy has shown us a NEW WAY! ABSOLUTE FREEDOM! Bundy has declared the entire area surrounding Bundy Ranch as a TOTALLY RULES-FREE ZONE! ANYTHING GOES! WOO-HOO!!!”

The page also proudly states that Bundyfest is a “gay friendly atmosphere” that permits “full nudity.”

Read more:

So the hippies figure they need some attention. Will they be responsible for grazing fees? I have seen some of those rainbow people around my home town and have to believe they are responsible for the road restrictions during the spring. Might need to increase them a bit for those double grazers.
There's a lot of Conservative activity on my facebook page. I'm going to post that and a link to the CPF.
Good-luck with the attempt.  They can't charge admission unless the BLM allows them to, out of snarkiness toward the Bundy's.   
It's a very good ad...for GREG BRANNON!!!  See, Tillis DID support OC.  He tried to get the NC legislature to allow the federal exchanges to be set up in NC.  That is why we conservatives must support Brannon in the primary.  Tillis is just another RINO.
Political Discussion and Debate / Who is up for a pro life bitch slapping?
« Last post by The Boo Man... on April 22, 2014, 07:06:11 PM »
Dear Matt, ever since I first read your blog I knew you were a cowardly fake. It wasn’t until I started reading some of your anti-choice articles that my suspicions were truly confirmed. You spend a lot of time picking the low hanging fruit. You attack the weakest abortion rights arguments while ignoring the glaring weaknesses in your own position.

If you had the guts or the brains you’d try to respond to the most important abortion rights argument… bodily autonomy or bodily integrity. This means that we have the final jurisdiction over our own bodies. Nobody can claim a right to our body that goes above our own right. Nobody can use our bodies without consent. We cannot be forced to donate organs or blood to someone else. A fetus must survive on a woman’s body so the woman has a right to withdrawal her consent and her body at any time.

This is the pro-choice argument that no anti-choice fanatic… especially one as stubborn and simpleminded as you… could ever possibly dispute. If you still don’t understand, try to imagine this hypothetical…

Imagine that you wake up one morning in a hospital bed. In the bed next to you is a famous singer. He is unconscious and all of these tubes are connected from him to you. A doctor comes in and explains that the singer became sick and you are the only person with the right blood type to match his. They need you to remain hooked up to him until he recovers… they tell you it should only take nine months. Until then, he needs to use all of your organs… your kidneys, liver, lungs, everything… just to survive. If you unplug yourself, he will die. So do you think you are obligated to stay plugged in? Does he have a right to live off of you like this? Should you be FORCED to stay connected to him?

That’s what situation the pregnant woman is in. Instead of harping on all of these irrelevant issues, I wish you’d be brave enough to address it from this angle. It is immoral to require a woman to sustain a fetus and it is moral for a woman to make a decision with her body based on what is right for her. How can you argue against this?

But I guess your blog is more about preaching to the choir than actually being intelligent and bold in your writing. What a shame.


Click here for the bitch slapperrific response...
I see Lamont is down once more.

The LNF has become the Yugo of forums...
You talking about US? Russia didn't invade nobody yet...

Aside from Crimea you mean...
Political Discussion and Debate / Re: Jews ordered to register in east Ukraine
« Last post by kalash on April 22, 2014, 06:47:09 PM »
Irrelevant. many countries have neo Nazis yet that doesn't give any other country the right to invade.
You talking about US? Russia didn't invade nobody yet...
A bunch of them are down.  Interesting...

I see Lamont is down once more. 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Powered by EzPortal