Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
1
Religion Forum / Re: 💣Muhammad: A Short Biography
« Last post by Ploughboy on December 13, 2018, 11:22:34 PM »
Here is further proof of my claim. I wrote the owner of this site and let him know that in section 7, Qur'an 2:193 is not referenced. He has not received my message yet so there has been no correction to the article. So its the same article I originally posted. You didn't mention anything about the missing reference in section 7. You focused on the first reference which is perfectly referenced.
http://www.centertruthjustice.org/watch/muhammad-a-short-biography

Now despite my careless mistake in section 7, I have referenced it better than all Imams in the world combined. Most Imams never reference anything except the name of the book they are quoting from or the name of the author. I have seen countless Imams quote without referencing. They even do that when they quote from the Bible. So even though my lack of reference in section 7 was a careless mistake on my part, it is not considered an insult in Islam not to reference your quote (based on the lack of referencing I've seen from them).
2
The Nut House / Re: Paris RIOTS over a Gas Tax ??
« Last post by milos on December 13, 2018, 11:19:08 PM »
3
Religion Forum / Re: 💣Muhammad: A Short Biography
« Last post by Ploughboy on December 13, 2018, 10:51:19 PM »
You don't even know what your talking about. You made a big deal about the first reference in the article. I did not make any changes to it. So here is every reference to the Sirah of Ibn Ishaq I have.

Section 1,

Ibn Ishaq, "The Life of Muhammad" (translated by Alfred Guillaume), p. 131 (Ishaq 183),

Section 2,

Ibn Ishaq "The life of Muhammad" (The Sira), p.243,

Section 3,

Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad (translated by Alfred Guillaume), p.311 (Ishaq 461).

Section 4,

Ibn Ishaq, "The life of Muhammad" (translated by Alfred Guillaume), p.647 (Ishaq 992),

The first section which you had originally accused me of not referencing is very well referenced. In fact, its perfectly referenced -- fool proof! Sections 3 & 4 follow suit. But even section 2 is a give away. Ibn Ishaq, "The Life of Muhammad." There is only one author named Ibn Ishaq in all history who wrote a Sirah called "The Life of Muhammad."

In section 1, I provide name of author, title of book, name of translator, page number and the book's reference number. There is only one book in existence with this reference and its 100% authentic.

Now muslims today reject the Sirah of Ibn Ishaq, even though its the earliest biography of Muhammad ever written. They say Ibn Ishaq was a liar. Yet Ibn Hisham approved what we read today and removed everything from the original work because it makes Muhammad look to brutal to unbelievers and cast Muhammad in a negative light. So everything we read from Ibn Ishaq has been approved by Ibn Hisham. Every other Sirah you read derives most of its information from Ibn Ishaq. The only Sirah that is more popular with muslims is the Ash Shifa which is also very ancient and original in scope. But Ibn Ishaq is the earliest history ever written by a muslim about Muhammad. Even the popular Sirah called "The Sealed Nectar" relied on Ibn Ishaq as did Martin Lings book "Muhammad:His Life Based on the Earliest Sources." All the works and more, for the exception of the Ash Shifa (as that is entirely an original work with little Ibn Ishaq influence), derived their sources from the earliest account.
4
They're out of money and refuse to give up on supporting illegals.
If not for fraudulent voting, they'd be out of power.

They have options:

Tax per flush
Tax per mile driven
Tax per child
Tax per square footage of house
Tax per estimated carbon footprint
Tax based on money in savings account(s)


5
Religion Forum / Re: 💣Muhammad: A Short Biography
« Last post by Solar on December 13, 2018, 09:07:20 PM »
Look, I admitted I forgot to source Qur'an 2:193 but you didn't even notice that. You focused on making me prove certain books I had already sourced existed. Sourcing and proving a source exist or two separate issues. Gees, I probably have the best reputation on the internet for sourcing my works. That's why it surprised me that I forgot to source Qur'an 2:193, as I cite that all the time. Yet you accuse me of not sourcing books I did source. But in reality you are not used to seeing Sunnah sources and therefore you assumed those sources might have been fabricated. Though here again, I probably have the best reputation on the Internet for sourcing as well as properly quoting. I only quote from authentic sources and I own everything I quote from. I do none of my research on the Internet. So you can talk shit all you want and it makes not a damn bit of difference. If you want to ban me than go pleasure yourself by banning me. But stop lying about what I sourced because the only change that has been made was I added a reference for Qur'an 2:193 that you didn't notice. You just didn't think the Sunnah of Muhammad existed and I can go to all Islamic bookstores online and verify their existence as well as the importance the Sunnah is to Islam. In fact, without the Sunnah there is no Islam.
Hey Dumb Ass! In your first OP, all you sourced was some guy you claim translated what you posted.
That's why I deleted it.
Your need to add little bombs made it appear as if it was quoted from another site, without accreditation.
You may think of yourself as some authority on Muscums, but as far as I'm concerned, you're no more educated on the topic than my neighborhood deacon.
But when it comes to posting on this site, simply point out what you're posting is your opinion, and and when you quote something, source it, one you've posted, or at least the book you took them from.

This conversation is over, if you're to thick to grasp simple concepts such as copyright laws, then don't fuckin post here..
There is but one response I expect to hear from you, and that is, that you understand and will do as asked, if not, I see no reason to keep you around.
6
Religion Forum / Re: 💣Muhammad: A Short Biography
« Last post by Ploughboy on December 13, 2018, 08:47:07 PM »
Look, I admitted I forgot to source Qur'an 2:193 but you didn't even notice that. You focused on making me prove certain books I had already sourced existed. Sourcing and proving a source exist or two separate issues. Gees, I probably have the best reputation on the internet for sourcing my works. That's why it surprised me that I forgot to source Qur'an 2:193, as I cite that all the time. Yet you accuse me of not sourcing books I did source. But in reality you are not used to seeing Sunnah sources and therefore you assumed those sources might have been fabricated. Though here again, I probably have the best reputation on the Internet for sourcing as well as properly quoting. I only quote from authentic sources and I own everything I quote from. I do none of my research on the Internet. So you can talk shit all you want and it makes not a damn bit of difference. If you want to ban me than go pleasure yourself by banning me. But stop lying about what I sourced because the only change that has been made was I added a reference for Qur'an 2:193 that you didn't notice. You just didn't think the Sunnah of Muhammad existed and I can go to all Islamic bookstores online and verify their existence as well as the importance the Sunnah is to Islam. In fact, without the Sunnah there is no Islam.
7
The Nut House / Re: Warning: Graphic
« Last post by Solar on December 13, 2018, 07:59:17 PM »

Ouch
Judging by the spikes, they had to unscrew them first. :scared:
8
The Nut House / Re: Bimbo Names Daughter ABCDE Gets Mocked
« Last post by Rotwang on December 13, 2018, 07:44:16 PM »
Quote me: I hate her. She's a stupid bitch. She named her stupid child a stupid name because she is a stupid Liberal bitch.

All Liberals are stupid. I hate all Liberals.











I suggest using tear gas on RanB, the woman, the child, and RanB again..


Stupid Names are IN
9
The Nut House / Re: Gender dysphoria- Mom wants to make 6y/o boy into a confused girl.
« Last post by Rotwang on December 13, 2018, 07:43:03 PM »
It sounds like Mom has some serious mental issues.


No sh*t
10
The Nut House / Re: Warning: Graphic
« Last post by Rotwang on December 13, 2018, 07:42:12 PM »
Roid Rage

Just kidding, but be warned, these are graphic pics.
Poor guy. :cry:



The accident resulted in him being impaled with foot long, half-inch thick metal rods, the People’s Daily reported.

He was first taken to a local hospital before he was transferred to the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University due to the severity of his injuries.

Six steel rods fixed on a steel plate pierced his right shoulder and chest, and four penetrated elsewhere in his body.

During the operation, doctors found that one of the rods missed an artery by just 0.1mm.



The rods also prevented doctors from carrying out X-rays before the operation.

“They were relatively big so there was no means of getting fitting the patient into the X-ray machine while the nails themselves could have caused interference with X-rays," said Wu Panfeng, an associate professor of hand microsurgery.

Surgeons worked through the night to take out all of the rods in Mr Zhou's body




https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/7954270/factory-robot-malfunctions-and-impales-worker-with-10-foot-long-steel-spikes/


Ouch
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Powered by EzPortal