Recent Posts

Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
1
Wiki, Serioously?

Yeah, gotta stand with Solar here. Wiki?

Wikipedia isn't legitimate source material for political subjects any more. Hasn't been for years. It's like querying the New York Times or Salon.com or Rolling Stone.

A long time ago it was a noble experiment. I was a contributing author for years, and some of my work is still there. But the Left caught on to its growing importance and assigned troops to police its ranks. Let me elaborate on one example of a pattern of behavior I've been seeing at Wikipedia for many years now.
 
A few years ago, I authored a new article on Wikipedia about a gal named Melowese Richardson, a black woman who, as a poll worker in suburban Cincinnati, was convicted and sentenced to prison for voting illegally numerous times. In the current climate of conflict on the subject of voter registration, I thought it was a perfect addition to the knowledge base. (She's easy to find on the internet, just not on Wikipedia.) The Lefty trolls on Wiki thought otherwise.

My article, which was thoroughly researched and backed by at least 9 linked sources, was disappeared. It was not modified or edited or criticized or offered up in some other form. It vanished. It was made to not exist.

The explanation I received was that it concerned a person who had committed only one notable act, and such persons don't get attention on Wikipedia. I asked how Bruno Hauptmann and Rosa Parks and Timothy McVeigh and Lee Harvey Oswald managed to get such lavish coverage on Wikipedia, even though each was a guy or gal who did just one notable thing.

Crickets.

The real reason -- and this has become crystal clear to thousands of Wikipedia users and especially contributors -- is that Wikipedia is now an organ of the Left, essentially an extension of the Democrat Party. Wikipedia is thoroughly trooped with Leftist trolls who police every article with any political significance. As a registered author and contributor, I've had political content erased within seconds after submitting it. Let me repeat this. I have seen my original content submissions vanish within less than 10 seconds of submission. I have never seen my original online content erased as quickly as it is on Wikipedia. My stuff would last longer on Mother Jones.
2
I don't believe I've read any of your prior posts and am slow to "welcome" you.  Yes, we are all waiting to see what Sessions is going to do; however, I'm curious as to why you would select Giuliani, who is very much a part of the establishment?? Giuliani would be one of the last people I'd select given  that Comey questioned Giuliani's involvement in leaking information about Clinton's e-mails. Giuliani has made claim that he has 'ties' to the FBI ... so why oh why, would you now want make him the AG?  Do you remember his mention of an October surprise??  He may very well have solid information to bring her down ... but he was also helping Trump's campaign at the time.  As the AG ... he would then have to possibly investigate himself. 

IF Sessions doesn't work out the best man for the job would be Cruz hands down. He has the legal background, expertise and knowledge.  He'd be perfect! 

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/04/nyregion/as-trump-ally-rudy-giuliani-hints-at-ties-to-the-fbi.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/fbi-rudy-giuliani-leaks_us_5909f5a8e4b02655f84300fc

https://www.salon.com/2017/05/04/the-fbi-is-investigating-whether-rudy-giuliani-leaked-information-about-hillary-clintons-emails/
3
About Time!  :thumbsup:

ICE to target employers who hire illegal immigrants


"That Don't Impress Me Much."  You can get that many in one town.

They should be able every day. 
4
Waiting for Jeff to do something as well, he's acting timidly and cowardly. There may be a master plan but if not, he needs to step aside and let Rudy G. take over.




Adjusted jpg size.
walks
5
It sure as heck doesn't seem like it.  Opportunity is knocking on the door to hold the Clintons and Obama responsible.  Most of us knew of the corruption, and certainly evidence had to be put on hold until after the election to ensure that Obama wouldn't pardon Clinton and certainly there would be know chance of prosecution if Clinton became president.  The opportunity is now...my hunch is IF 'they' ever get around to holding the Clintons responsible, they're going to take down quite a few with them.  I'm not holding my breath.  The Clintons have escaped any wrongdoing for decades and Obama has ensured that they are all well insulated.  Waiting on Sessions to make a move ...
Here's to hoping Sessions and Trump know they can go a long way right now in restoring faith in our government and faith in our judicial system by bringing this matter to court. Not to mention that Trump could seal up his reelection.
6
I don't know what this is all about?

Were people killed at hooters?

The narration say’s they are taking bodies out of Hooters.

Is this tinfoil hat stuff?

If so, I apologize for the post.

VEGAS BOMBSHELL: VIDEO SHOWS 17 AMBULANCES PULLING BODIES OUT OF HOOTERS

Video captured night of the Oct. 1 massacre reveals LVMPD and FBI are withholding key details about what actually transpired

Quote
LAS VEGAS (INTELLIHUB) — On the night of October 1, Youtuber Benjamin Franks and his friend had just grabbed some tacos and were heading back to their hotel room at the MGM when they noticed a separate disturbance at the corner of Las Vegas Blvd and Tropicana Ave.

15-minutes later, from the leisure of his hotel room, Franks managed to capture bombshell video footage which shows a total of 17 ambulances removing human bodies from Hooters, contradicting the official story told by Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo.

“They are just pulling so many bodies out of that Hooters,” a man’s voice can be heard saying at the 24-second mark. “I don’t know if people are dead — I don’t know if people are just injured — they just keep pullin’ them out though […] something definitely happened at Hooters though.”

Hooters Casino and Hotel is located at 115 E. Tropicana Ave. which is just northeast of the venue where the Route 91 Music Festival was being hosted.


VEGAS BOMBSHELL: VIDEO SHOWS 17 AMBULANCES PULLING BODIES OUT OF HOOTERS | US Defense Watch
7

About Time!  :thumbsup:

Quote
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is prepared to criminally prosecute illegal immigrants in the workplace, as well as those employers who hire them.

"While we focus on the criminal prosecution of employers who knowingly hire illegal workers, under the current administration's enforcement priorities, workers encountered during these investigations who are unauthorized to remain in the United States are also subject to administrative arrest and removal from the country," ICE spokeswoman Danielle Bennett said in an email to the Washington Examiner.

This week, acting ICE Director Thomas Homan said his agency will increase workplace immigration enforcement effort four to five times the level current.

According to Bennett, that includes pursing more investigations and "conducting more I-9 audits."

An I-9 form is used for verifying the identity and employment authorization for someone to be hired to work in the U.S.

Data provided to the Washington Examiner shows that from Feb. 9, 2016, to June 24, 2017, ICE arrested 42 people in management and 55 people in non-management for criminal immigration violations, and all but 15 were indicted and convicted. The highest amount in the past few years was in fiscal 2011 under former President Barack Obama, when ICE arrested 221 people in management and 492 in non-management, for a total of 713 -- there has been a relative steady decline in the years following.

On ICE's website, it still has policy posted from 2013, which was revised and instituted in 2009 under Obama. That policy aims to target employers that use illegal immigrants as a business model, mistreat their workers, engaged in human smuggling or trafficking, commit identity and benefit fraud, launder money or engage in other criminal activity.

ICE to target employers who hire illegal immigrants
8
Did you miss this?
And still, it's illegal. Regardless of what these lib cesspools do, it's still against the law.
This only serves to amplify my earlier point, that even libs are against this illegal nonsense.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/general_politics/march_2016/voters_strongly_reject_letting_illegal_immigrants_vote
9
Herein lies the issue, we don't have all the answers, we don't know what Trump is dealing with where the corrupt GOP is concerned.
All you have is speculation, accusations, which does nothing but raise further suspicion on Trump, when in fact, so far he is trying to get his agenda through and the GOP blocks his every move.

You claim you have not blamed Trump for anything, yet nearly every post is full of accusations that Trump may be somehow involved in collusion or some other form of deception, and no, it's not a matter of semantics.
The guy hasn't even had a year in office and you want everything NOW, and that's just not going to happen, even Reagan had to maneuver a hostile Congress, yet he was able to accomplish his agenda in spite of the opposition.

Trump has undone more leftist agenda than Reagan did by this time in office, and look what Reagan accomplished in his first term.
Gears of govt move slowly, and when you have two party's working against you, they nearly grind to a halt.
With that in mind, Trump has so far been very successful, so I'm still willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, and I didn't even support the guy, but I recognize what he's up against.

Our opinions differ. I sincerely hope that Trump is successful. Right now, the MSM has been absolutely silent on all of this which is not surprising but troubling nonetheless.  So ... obviously we wait ... and we see what happens.
10
Do these investigations EVER go beyond the investigations? :cursing:

It sure as heck doesn't seem like it.  Opportunity is knocking on the door to hold the Clintons and Obama responsible.  Most of us knew of the corruption, and certainly evidence had to be put on hold until after the election to ensure that Obama wouldn't pardon Clinton and certainly there would be know chance of prosecution if Clinton became president.  The opportunity is now...my hunch is IF 'they' ever get around to holding the Clintons responsible, they're going to take down quite a few with them.  I'm not holding my breath.  The Clintons have escaped any wrongdoing for decades and Obama has ensured that they are all well insulated.  Waiting on Sessions to make a move ...
Pages: 1 2 3 ... 10
Powered by EzPortal