Bizarre Facebook survey asks users if they condone pedophilia
So Faceplant innocently portrays an encounter between an older male and a young girl, and frames it as a private issue?
That's right, screw morality, screw the law, pedophiles are people too, just misunderstood?
From here on out, he'll always be Zuckerperv to me.
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXb3vlNX0AATEwh.jpg)
(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DXb3_tGW0AAJ6ui.jpg)
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2018/03/06/bizarre-facebook-survey-asks-users-if-condone-pedophilia.html
People need to understand that this is the internet; and, both good and bad things are on the internet. We need to understand the perks and the dangers.
If someone asks you for something you don't want to give out, you don't give it out (anything). Not your address. Not your phone number. Not pics of your private parts, Nothing. You ignore it, or block it. It's that simple. No need for surveys or polls. No need for micromanagement of personal content. No need for a Liberal ran social organization to decide what is "appropriate" in their eyes. In worse cases, especially such as death threats, get people involved. Death threats are far more serious than some random perv asking for nudie pics.
Also, who decides what is the standard for "sexual"? There are classic album covers with underage nudes on them; should they be banned?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 07, 2018, 10:34:21 AM
People need to understand that this is the internet; and, both good and bad things are on the internet. We need to understand the perks and the dangers.
If someone asks you for something you don't want to give out, you don't give it out (anything). Not your address. Not your phone number. Not pics of your private parts, Nothing. You ignore it, or block it. It's that simple. No need for surveys or polls. No need for micromanagement of personal content. No need for a Liberal ran social organization to decide what is "appropriate" in their eyes. In worse cases, especially such as death threats, get people involved. Death threats are far more serious than some random perv asking for nudie pics.
Also, who decides what is the standard for "sexual"? There are classic album covers with underage nudes on them; should they be banned?
We don't really need more blurry, fuzzy, nebulous gray areas. We don't need to be prudes and puritans either, but we really don't need continual, deliberate encouragement of challenging all norms.
This has already taken us from being kind and decent to gay people to allowing sick bastards to mingle with children in showers and toilets, abusing gender.
It's gone from first trimester / mostly for the health of the mother or fetus...... to partial birth mangling infanticide.
It's gone from children's rights to a child's right to marry or "love" whoever they want, without "age bias".
Society gave us a pretty good set of lines to not cross, from 5000 years of practical application, vs. human nature and the downside of it.
We don't need a bunch of jackasses from the 1% of sick freaks, to redefine everything for us.