Quote from: WMK on November 21, 2020, 07:18:40 AM
I envy your confidence of Trump being put in the W column as POTUS. I may share your passion for such, but I am high doubtful that will happen.

Therefore, I see only two scenarios for Republicans in office: apply the status quo and go along to get along -glide with the political winds, or take a stand and get ready for the fight of your political lives.
For there will be a formidable coalition of right-minded voters that will be rising up and ousting any and all who have not ACTIVELY stood strongly behind the President in this election battle. Why do I feel this will happen? Because about 90% of Trump voters believe this election was corrupted and illegitimate. And they will not tolerate this without a fight to the end.
At the moment, I see only shadows of supposed political 'allies' lurking in the background of our President. But in his voting block, I see an army building...one seasoned and ready for battle, willing to take and extract every last one of those "shadows."  For sure, the advent of a new political era is upon us! One that living Americans have never experienced before. And one that could make the 60's look like Mr. Rogers Neighborhood.

I agree with you. I know that God is in charge and I trust Him completely. I do however believe from scripture that the devil is dictating the agenda of many. The Bible talks about persecution and if I go back to Roman times, the Jews suffered much at the hands of those who were following the devil rather than God. In more modern times, the Nazis attempted to exterminate God's people, unsuccessfully. The way the left has demonized Christians and Conservatives, it would be no surprise to me if this happened again.

Quote from: WMK on November 21, 2020, 07:41:39 AM
Nope, never noticed that. And I'm quite familiar with them all. In fact, Megyn Kelly can't even be mentioned in the same breath as Carlson and Malden. IMO, she's just a quick-witted career seeker with eye appeal and moxie.
Been listening to Carlson since The McLaughlin Group and still reading Malkin. You can label them what you want, but knowing matters as I do, I know they have both spoken truth to power and spouted the same principles I believe in.

I have heard recent remarks by Kelly that gave me reason to give her a second look.  She is singing a different song since leaving the networks.  Seems to have her own voice, which so far I can agree with.  The Jury is still out.

I think Tucker is going to have to make a choice.  He should never have gone after Powell the way he did.  Seemed like he tried to walk some of it back, just short of admitting he acted like a dick.  Well see.  He has options at the moment, but that window could close quickly if he starts whoring for the kids running the network.  He's seen/lived the swamp and knows the creatures that live there, and I truly believe he sees them for the lying scum they are.

I like Malkin, I would call her the conservative of the bunch.  A feisty little spark plug.  She doesn't get the screen time she deserves.  Probably the take no prisoner approach she has.

I think my favorite at FOX is Mark Levin.  I worry though that he gets so worked up at times I'm afraid he's going to have a stroke or heart attack.  His weekend show on FOX does the best interviews.  Gutfeld on Saturday is another favorite.  And that's it for FOX.  Tucker, for the moment, Levin and Gutfeld.  I think all three are going to have find a home soon.

Internet is the place to be.  Streaming for me sucks because of satellite internet.  I subscribe to The Blaze but it's hard to stream.  I know many think of Beck as a gook with a chalk board.  But I'll tell ya, go back 5 or 10 years and see what he had on those chalk boards.  It's amazing.  He has some great researchers.  The network is growing and is one of the biggest subscription services.

Seems like FOX has forgotten who brought them to the dance.

Quote from: RV on November 21, 2020, 08:30:22 AM
I agree with you. I know that God is in charge and I trust Him completely. I do however believe from scripture that the devil is dictating the agenda of many. The Bible talks about persecution and if I go back to Roman times, the Jews suffered much at the hands of those who were following the devil rather than God. In more modern times, the Nazis attempted to exterminate God's people, unsuccessfully. The way the left has demonized Christians and Conservatives, it would be no surprise to me if this happened again.

As tempting as it is, let's leave scripture to the religion forum.

I think she should be all over the media with her proof.  Follow it up with the courts.  She needs the media right now to get her word out, otherwise it will be swept under the rug.  In the Flynn case, she put proof out there right away and then followed up at the courts.  Why not now? 

Quote from: karen on November 21, 2020, 09:45:26 AM
I think she should be all over the media with her proof.  Follow it up with the courts.  She needs the media right now to get her word out, otherwise it will be swept under the rug.  In the Flynn case, she put proof out there right away and then followed up at the courts.  Why not now?

One problem. If she presents proof, she exposes the whistle blowers names.

Quote from: Solar on November 21, 2020, 10:15:56 AM
One problem. If she presents proof, she exposes the whistle blowers names.

The media has not been on President Trump or the American people's "side" for over 3 years. There is no "proof", fact or evidence that she could offer that would in any way make the leftist media change. The media has been complicit in this charade. Her only hope is to get a Constitutional judge who is not interested in legislating from the bench.

Quote from: karen on November 21, 2020, 09:45:26 AM
I think she should be all over the media with her proof.  Follow it up with the courts.  She needs the media right now to get her word out, otherwise it will be swept under the rug.  In the Flynn case, she put proof out there right away and then followed up at the courts.  Why not now?

That's an interesting observation, Karen.
Now I do know that lawyers have much trepidation as to what their claims are where 'election anomalies' have occurred. For example, I know if a lawyer applies the word fraudulent in an election case, he or she could face disbarment if it cannot be clearly shown.
IMO, if there is a solid construct by which election fraud can be exposed here, then explaining a basic but comprehensive framework should suffice without divulging vital specifics necessary to prosecuting such a case successfully.

Quote from: WMK on November 21, 2020, 11:20:52 PM
That's an interesting observation, Karen.
Now I do know that lawyers have much trepidation as to what their claims are where 'election anomalies' have occurred. For example, I know if a lawyer applies the word fraudulent in an election case, he or she could face disbarment if it cannot be clearly shown.
IMO, if there is a solid construct by which election fraud can be exposed here, then explaining a basic but comprehensive framework should suffice without divulging vital specifics necessary to prosecuting such a case successfully.

They have, but that's not enough for the media. Lawyers have done one Hell of a job proving to the public fraud occurred, but the left wants to claim what is obvious to anyone with a single working braincell didn't happen.

What you see taking place is what the left does with the media, they create cognitive disillusionment in hopes that the American people think whatever evidence is presented, will never be enough.
The left cannot be allowed to get anywhere any evidence, they will trash it to the point that even normal people will be convinced they need to see more. The idea is to create doubt in public opinion.

No, We've all seen enough, let the law stand~!

Here is how the media views the evidence, example, if two people go into a sealed room together, and one of them is strangled to death, you know who did it, Right?
In today's Marxist media fantasy land, they'd be saying, "But, but you have no actual proof that person strangled the other. No one witnessed the actual murder."

Why is the onus on us to prove a negative? Ask yourself libs, why is the media not simply doing their jobs and investigating, instead of doing all they can to create doubt?
Any Lib takers?

Quote from: karen on November 21, 2020, 09:45:26 AM
I think she should be all over the media with her proof.  Follow it up with the courts.  She needs the media right now to get her word out, otherwise it will be swept under the rug.  In the Flynn case, she put proof out there right away and then followed up at the courts.  Why not now?

Most of the witnesses would have asked that their names be kept out of the public limelight.  The media would go after them as opposed to going after the facts.  Much easier for the lazy scumbags in the media to check someone's social media than to see how Trumps margins disappeared overnight.

All of Trumps legal team are highly qualified and solid reputations, if they say they saw something, they did.  If Powell were to lay it out now before getting in front of the court, that would give a lower court the time to spin any rulings from the bench.  Look at the PA ruling as an example.  The judge basically said there was no proof that 10 million votes were switched in two counties.  No shit.

One fraudulent vote is one too many.  No, don't give these bastards time to come up with some bullshit excuse about how a massive lead disappears overnight.

Quote from: Solar on November 22, 2020, 04:54:14 AM
They have, but that's not enough for the media. Lawyers have done one Hell of a job proving to the public fraud occurred, but the left wants to claim what is obvious to anyone with a single working braincell didn't happen.

What you see taking place is what the left does with the media, they create cognitive disillusionment in hopes that the American people think whatever evidence is presented, will never be enough.
The left cannot be allowed to get anywhere any evidence, they will trash it to the point that even normal people will be convinced they need to see more. The idea is to create doubt in public opinion.
No, We've all seen enough, let the law stand~!

=======================================================
Very soon this will be purely a legal case where tangible, credible evidence is going to have to be presented before a court of law. All the hyperbole and propaganda in the world won''t white-wash solid evidence and sworn affidavits backing such evidence up.

Quote from: WMK on November 22, 2020, 09:16:04 AM
=======================================================
Very soon this will be purely a legal case where tangible, credible evidence is going to have to be presented before a court of law. All the hyperbole and propaganda in the world won''t white-wash solid evidence and sworn affidavits backing such evidence up.

This is why the huge push to attempt to legitimize a fraudulent election, their media has done this for decades and think they can pull it off again, but the evidence in court will trash their claims, of this I'm certain.

Quote from: Solar on November 22, 2020, 09:57:47 AM
This is why the huge push to attempt to legitimize a fraudulent election, their media has done this for decades and think they can pull it off again, but the evidence in court will trash their claims, of this I'm certain.

More screaming at the sky.

Quote from: Killer Clouds on November 22, 2020, 01:02:52 PM
More screaming at the sky.

Instead of your emotional and innocuous comments which simply waste everyone's time here, how about to point out where you disagree with what I said.

Quote from: Solar on November 22, 2020, 01:07:08 PM
Instead of your emotional and innocuous comments which simply waste everyone's time here, how about to point out where you disagree with what I said.

I disagree with all your BS. Your sky screaming is getting old. Your spouting BS. The DNC is dead. Well it looks like the DNC is far from dead and possibly will be in the white house.