Well the bottom line as my post pointed out is America is changing and the republican party is not. It's not about welfare as some guy above thinks. When 60% of women, 70% of Asians and Latinos vote Democrat..republicans have a problem, we really aren't making more old white guys at the same rate. The teabaggers have ruined your party imo.People on this forum paint the Democratic party as leftwing but in reality the far left is the base but it doesn't run the party and in fact their are moderates like Clinton was imo and blue dog Dems. In other word it's a bigger tent that represents different people.As far as accusing Dems of being "divisive" are you kidding? Were you not paying attention during the republican debates...they bashed just about everyone except white older males including, women, hispanics, blacks, gays and on and on.Have you seen a teabagger rally? A bunch of racist angry, older white people on government entitlements (SS) and socialized medicine (medicare).
I suggest you control the name calling if you want to continue posting.Second, back up your claim with solid proof, and I don't mean Mitt's comment about the 47%, I mean where we insult women, hispanics, blacks, gays and on and on.
I suggest you control the name calling if you want to continue posting.
Is this a forum...where people can express their opinion? Your "moderation" said nothing about the guy who directly called me an "idiot" on this forum today. I suggest you "moderate" everyone not just those who have a different opinion then you. And you want "solid proof" that conservatives have insulted women, hispanics, blacks etc....really?? Are you paying any attention..how about the republican primary debates. Bottom line it doesn't really matter what you think about this issue...in FACT 70% plus Hispanics, Asian, etc voted Democrat and they decided this election.Earth to fake moderate guy who only moderates the few people on this forum who aren't parroting conservaive media apparently.And yes I can back up everrything I say...that is if I'm allowed to. I noticed you didn't challenge anyone else who commented...and I have seen many racist comments on this forum and you take issue with "teabagger"?
So is "libtard" an ok term? How about "fag"?
I'm kind of curious as to will the Libertarians learn anything, how did throwing your vote down the crapper or sitting home whining work out for you? I say that as a card carrying libertarian who will never again donate one thin dime to the Libertarian party, I will remain Libertarian in most of my ideals but the party can kiss my ass.All a moot point because this was most likely the last election a conservative or common man will be able to have an effect in.We passed the last exit yesterday, the best course now is take care of yourself and family and don't let politics obsess you.the founding fathers built this and we gave it away.
Lock and load young man, it is going to be a long road ahead for people under 50.
If our founding fathers took that position, we'd still be part of the British Commonwealth. Just sayin'...-Dr Watt
Tell us what "WE", as Republicans, should now support? Become Democrat Lite?WHERE should we stand on the issues.
You're welcome. From where I sit, the R's DO have more of that than the D's do. As examples I offer Rushbo, Ann Coulter, and others of that ilk. I offer Mitch McConnell again. But there is also Boehner, who, because he is NOT like that, is denounced as a RINO. So yes, I am fairly confident that R's are much more close minded than D's, as a group. I heard a guy on the radio saying he watched both conventions. He said the R convention looked like a Klan rally. The D convention looked more like America looks. He kind of had a point, too.
He said the R convention looked like a Klan rally