Here we can see some clues that explain why do some libertards support the initiative of BO to close the nuke deal with Iran. Here they are:

Quote1. It curbs Iran's ability to develop a nuclear weapon.
2. Sanctions can be reimposed and the military option remains on the table.
3. Rejecting the agreement would lead to a splintering of the international partnership that has been critical to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.
4. This agreement will move in parallel with increased commitments to security assistance for Israel and our other allies in the region.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/sen-amy-klobuchar/why-i-am-supporting-the-iran-nuclear-agreement_b_7972172.html

Unfortunately Barry and all the Presidents men forget to prove the facts. Everybody knows that it's been about a years since the USA is doing everything to make away with Israel and there's no single argument to prove the opposite.
Moreover there's no proof that the agreement with curb any ability of the Iranian side of the deal. The Iranians on the other hand have clearly shown us they're not interested in partnership with the West except of the nuclear energy and oil.
So the enemy stays the same but with the enriched uranium.
Wake your guess what will happen next!

Because they put party loyalty over the safety of the United States. No more, no less!

The whole Nuke Deal is phony!!   No one with half a brain is buying this BS.

Quote from: mdgiles on August 12, 2015, 11:33:09 AM
Because they put party loyalty over the safety of the United States. No more, no less!

Nailed it. Democrats are so short sighted and unintended consequences is a foreign concept to them. Just like their insane desire to allow all illegals to vote if possible. They don't realize those folks would throw these old, White guys as soon as they could.

The cartoon included in the original post is a very good one.  It illustrates the situation pretty well.

A more complete illustration would include Obama also lavishly feeding the bull.

That's the limitation of cartoons.  One picture makes it possible to tell only so much of the truth.  That's why we have many cartoonists drawing many cartoons of politicians.

Quote from: je_freedom on August 12, 2015, 08:57:48 PM
The cartoon included in the original post is a very good one.  It illustrates the situation pretty well.

A more complete illustration would include Obama also lavishly feeding the bull.

That's the limitation of cartoons.  One picture makes it possible to tell only so much of the truth.  That's why we have many cartoonists drawing many cartoons of politicians.

Had I drawn it, I'd have eliminated the fence, and had the Marxist using a stick and drawing a line in the sand around the bull as representative of his hard stance on Syria.
That's what all this is about anyway, a petulant Child POTUS that looked the fool on the world stage, helps ISIS become a threat to the entire M/E as a way of revenge.

Quote from: Solar on August 13, 2015, 06:37:24 AM
Had I drawn it, I'd have eliminated the fence, and had the Marxist using a stick and drawing a line in the sand around the bull as representative of his hard stance on Syria.
That's what all this is about anyway, a petulant Child POTUS that looked the fool on the world stage, helps ISIS become a threat to the entire M/E as a way of revenge.

Yeah, a red line around the bull would have been more appropriate. 

why would anyone be worried....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TcbU5jAavw

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice...

Quote from: fraggle on August 13, 2015, 07:14:41 AM
why would anyone be worried....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TcbU5jAavw

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice...

Good point!

Quote from: fraggle on August 13, 2015, 07:14:41 AM
why would anyone be worried....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TcbU5jAavw

Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice...

Almost an exact echo of Obama rhetoric today!!  Would make a good campaign ad against the dems in the general election.

The Liberals have been systematically selling out America for decades!!

Funny...  There wasn't a 'deal', nor talk of one 12-months ago.  And libs were in ignorant-bliss on the topic.

Well one lib wasn't.  Jarrett The Commie Iranian. 

That un-elected piece of crap has brought us here.  I'd love to read the Israeli intelligence-community's secret dossier on her.  I hope someone will leak it while she's still alive. 

Lets see, Iran get 150 billion dollars unfrozen and sanctions removed. We get empty promises.

Yepp, sure sounds like a liberal/progressive deal, peace in our time indeed.

Quote from: kit saginaw on August 13, 2015, 09:00:07 AM
Funny...  There wasn't a 'deal', nor talk of one 12-months ago.  And libs were in ignorant-bliss on the topic.

Well one lib wasn't.  Jarrett The Commie Iranian. 

That un-elected piece of crap has brought us here.  I'd love to read the Israeli intelligence-community's secret dossier on her.  I hope someone will leak it while she's still alive.

Jarett?  She should be sent to Iran to stay. 

Quote from: keyboarder on August 13, 2015, 09:41:05 PM
Jarett?  She should be sent to Iran to stay.

Anybody who was paying attention saw who was running this deal from the get go.

As to why 'they' support it.....  $$$ of course

http://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/259895/traitor-senators-took-money-iran-lobby-back-iran-daniel-greenfield

The real victory had come long before when two of their biggest politicians, Joe Biden and John Kerry, had moved into prime positions in the administration. Not only IAPAC, but key Iran Lobby figures had been major donors to both men.

That list includes Housang Amirahmadi, the founder of the American Iranian Council, who had spoken of a campaign to "conquer Obama's heart and mind" and had described himself as "the Iranian lobby in the United States." It includes the Iranian Muslim Association of North America (IMAN) board members who had fundraised for Biden.