Conservative Political Forum

Instead of debating the obvious, lets cut to the chase and look at where the dim party is headed.

There is soo many to choose from, so I thought I'd just pick one from the first page of a search since they all have about the same information.

Socialism’s true origin, intent and purpose

Few Britons today are aware of the existence of the Fabian Society and even fewer are familiar with its ideology, aims, influence and power. As its own documents show, the Society has always aimed to establish a Socialist regime controlled by itself.

Contrary to current political mythology (or disinformation) which has it that Socialism was a working-class movement, the fact is that it originated with the liberal capitalist middle classes where the Fabian Society was at home.

The leading elements of liberal capitalism – the big businessmen, industrialists and bankers – who had amassed great wealth on the back of the industrial revolution, aimed to strengthen their position of power and influence by two means: (1) by monopolising finance, economy and politics; and (2) by controlling the growing urban working class.

While the monopolisation of finance, economy and politics could only be achieved by the centralisation of capital, means of production, etc., the working class could only be controlled through organisation and promises of a larger share in resources. These measures formed the core of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels’ Manifesto of the Communist Party (1848). Both authors were middle class and Engels, Marx’s financial supporter, was a wealthy textile industrialist.
https://fabiansociety.wordpress.com

I will pretend this article isn't a pile of garbage and I will pretend that only an impressionable ten year old would draw the conclusions you do from it.  I will also note you have failed to define how commun, marxism and socialism are different.  This failure now twenty times over.

But if we accept this article is valid and proving what you claim it does(it does not), all it proves is that republicans are far more Marxist(in your false sense of the world) then democrats.

Also, calling them dims, is probably the lamest attempt at wit I have ever seen. 

There already is world government.  It is called the IMF.  It does have absolute control over much of the world's populace.  It is designed to benefit the rich and control the poor and middle class.

If you want to call that Marxism, I'll go along, but its simply absurd to use that term.  If we can get over the term, and agree that the IMF is harmful, we might get somewhere. 

I will note, the IMF has some similarities to Soviet Russia, but then again, it has a lot of similarities to the traditional capitalist west.  Both countries, have and will always have, an elite group that controls the poor.  This was after all the biggest debate at the constitutional convention.

Am I wrong or is that a dog trying to hump a monkey on a flag pole?

Close, they are commies after all, but no, it's a wolf in sheeps clothing.

Look, here's the thing, I'm not a Beck fan either. I hate drama and emotion, but everything in the video is true, everything he says about it in no way could be considered defamatory, rather he just brings the facts to the table and lets you come to your own conclusion.
It really is a quick introduction to Fabianism, just watch it and if you have a point to make, or can prove any of it wrong, then great, we'll discuss it.

I need a definition of Marxist in your view pleaes.

I cant find it can you please direct me to it or paste it?