Quote from: Barricade on October 17, 2020, 05:37:28 PM
So you won't answer. I don't have all the answers. I simply asked you a question as to what "Q" has predicted regarding the outcome of the election. Anything? I'm sure if/when Trump loses, the "Q" disinformation team wants to keep their little religion alive, so they will be careful to hedge and obfuscate in order to declare they were right no matter how things go down.

How can Trump lead the prophesied "Storm" and sweep all the Satanic cannibal pedophiles out of America if he loses the election?

Q knows he doesn't have to predict the inevitable, all he does is post facts the LSM refuses to acknowledge and give us a heads up on what to expect from the Marxist DNC.

Wait, what. Trumps going to lose. Hows that going to happen.

Q does not make predictions, he asks questions, have you looked at this, who is that and what is he doing, what is the relationship between X and Y. And yes there is some misdirection involved.

Quote from: Barricade on October 17, 2020, 05:16:47 PM
Straight up question:

What is the "Q" election prediction? Did the Nostradamus of the MAGA movement put his money where his mouth is and make a prediction he can be held to? Or is he hedging his bets and hiding behind obfuscation that can be interpreted in 20 different ways?

Barricade, Q has not predicted the outcome of the election. 
You seem to be very passionate about the work the Anons are doing.  I would like to understand how it is that you and I see things so differently.  Is it just Q that concerns you? Or do the Anons concern you, too?

The Anons were researching long before Q showed up, and they will continue long after Q disappears.

Real Anons are not dependent on Q. 
Real Anons do not advocate violence, except they feel traitors should be prosecuted and given the death sentence if found guilty.

Help me understand why you are so upset. 

Quote from: SueAnn on October 17, 2020, 09:59:58 PM
Barricade, Q has not predicted the outcome of the election. 
You seem to be very passionate about the work the Anons are doing.  I would like to understand how it is that you and I see things so differently.  Is it just Q that concerns you? Or do the Anons concern you, too?

The Anons were researching long before Q showed up, and they will continue long after Q disappears.

Real Anons are not dependent on Q. 
Real Anons do not advocate violence, except they feel traitors should be prosecuted and given the death sentence if found guilty.

Help me understand why you are so upset.

To understand him, you'd first have to be completely stupid of every aspect of Q, then believe every lie the LSM has spoken on the subject.

That's where this dolt is, he has no clue what is going on. He might after Biden gets slaughtered and is forced to face reality. But don't assume he's being honest and really wants to know.

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0a3163 No.11130733
Oct 18 2020 00:12:32 (EST) NEW
How do you inform your target(s) ['business partners'] what you have?
Why would H. Biden have such material on his laptop?
How was the content *originally* received?
Email?
Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?]
On purpose [years of being treated poorly by 'Pop'] or simple negligence?
If such information existed on laptop why wouldn't contents be claimed?
Several attempts made to contact to claim?
Messages left?
Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim *knowing* the contents on the drive could bury *Pops* & family.
A troubled life?
A troubled family?
Looks can be deceiving.
Q

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 0a3163 No.11130507
Oct 18 2020 00:01:04 (EST) NEW
Those who provided Hunter w/ underage girls [trafficked?] _same people who also took the pictures?
If large sums of money are being paid by foreign [state] actors [to protected [in powerful positions] US pols] would they want assurances the deal will be kept?
Bribes & blackmail.
Dark secrets.
Q

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 2d6c51 No.11136655
Oct 18 2020 11:13:02 (EST) NEW
https://twitter.com/AlexandraChalup/status/1317664854476525571
Panic?
Who is Alexandra Chalupa?
https://nypost.com/2019/11/13/who-is-alexandra-chalupa-the-dnc-operative-republicans-say-dug-for-dirt-on-trump/
Q
4893
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 1ed8d2 No.11136305
Oct 18 2020 10:46:32 (EST) NEW
HOW IS THE GAME PLAYED?
Example:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/08/hunter-biden-business-partner-fraud-428154
1. Unanimous convicted by Jury
2. Overturn of conviction by Judge Ronnie Abrams of the Southern District of New York [attempt to free _provide 'shade' H. Biden?]
3. Federal Appeals Court reinstates conviction
Background Judge Ronnie Abrams?
https://www.courthousenews.com/judge-wed-mueller-team-member-steps-away-trump-suits/
Married to Greg Andres?
Who is Greg Andres?
https://fr.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-lawyer-exclusive-idUSKBN1AH5F9
DRAIN THE SWAMP.
Q

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: aebf22 No.11174659
Oct 20 2020 15:28:16 (EST) NEW
https://yarn.co/yarn-clip/8b64b97c-f7e2-45d7-821a-0e4829c0eb6f
Q

Isn't Q an anonomous source? Why should she be given any more credibility than anonomous sources in the professional media?

Quote from: Tory Potter on October 21, 2020, 06:53:16 AM
Isn't Q an anonomous source? Why should she be given any more credibility than anonomous sources in the professional media?

Track record. The "professional" media has an excellent record of using anonymous sources to spread fake news so they will not be held liable. 

Quote from: Tory Potter on October 21, 2020, 06:53:16 AM
Isn't Q an anonomous source? Why should she be given any more credibility than anonomous sources in the professional media?

Q, through pics, has proven he is an insider. No one has that much access and not have clearance to go and take pics where he/she has.

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 292db4 No.11202027 📁
Oct 21 2020 21:21:53 (EST) NEW
BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.
This is not a drill.
Q


What could it be???

Quote from: Rick on October 21, 2020, 08:40:39 PM
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 292db4 No.11202027
Oct 21 2020 21:21:53 (EST) NEW
BOOMS EN_ROUTE TOMORROW.
This is not a drill.
Q


What could it be???

Based on all the other posts, it looks like the unveiling is about to begin. Trump will finally release the evidence to the world?

Quote from: Solar on October 21, 2020, 07:18:23 AM
Q, through pics, has proven he is an insider. No one has that much access and not have clearance to go and take pics where he/she has.

But she is still an anonymous source. There is no most basis to judge the veracity of her cryptic clues than the unnamed souces in any other media.
"Based on all the other posts, it looks like the unveiling is about to begin. Trump will finally release the evidence to the world?"

It always seems to be on the verge of a reveal but we never quite get there.
There are about 280 hours from the election and we have no idea if she is a cbinet secretary, some one in the press office, or a corporal in the GRU.

Quote from: Tory Potter on October 22, 2020, 07:33:51 AM
But she is still an anonymous source. There is no most basis to judge the veracity of her cryptic clues than the unnamed souces in any other media.
"Based on all the other posts, it looks like the unveiling is about to begin. Trump will finally release the evidence to the world?"

He she is an insider, just look back through Q history at some of the pics taken.

QuoteIt always seems to be on the verge of a reveal but we never quite get there.
There are about 280 hours from the election and we have no idea if she is a cbinet secretary, some one in the press office, or a corporal in the GRU.

That's the call of the whiner that wants prosecutions yesterday.
Again, look at what has happened, be it Epstein or Biden's Russian connection, we now know the truth, so yes, Q has been pretty spot on over the years.