https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AwIYHwbojQo
QuoteShe's flat out lying. Twitter was protecting journalists from being mocked by a meme they help create when they were mocking miners with "learn to code" articles and tweets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ9EJUwX3eM
QuoteShe needs to stop calling Twitter an open platform. Its not
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=we2ouS_JF7U
QuoteFree speech for all......like minded people....
I did an article on this a year or so ago:
https://conservativehardliner.com/google-government-company
Twitter is a cesspool. I don't know anyone in my personal circle who uses it anymore. It's become a breeding ground for leftie fascists who want to sit on their ass all day and complain about bullshit from their high and mighty stance behind a computer screen. If she had come out and stated her bias clean and clear 'We want to shut down free speech for conservatives and protect our libtard friends at every step of the way' I might have a little more respect for her just based on the fact that she was being honest. Yet when she sits there and blows smoke up everyone's ass in trying to justify the banning of 'hate speech' by conservatives when her own party is at the cutting edge of hate speech just makes my head shake with disgust.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on March 10, 2019, 08:52:25 PM
Twitter is a cesspool. I don't know anyone in my personal circle who uses it anymore. It's become a breeding ground for leftie fascists who want to sit on their ass all day and complain about bullshit from their high and mighty stance behind a computer screen. If she had come out and stated her bias clean and clear 'We want to shut down free speech for conservatives and protect our libtard friends at every step of the way' I might have a little more respect for her just based on the fact that she was being honest. Yet when she sits there and blows smoke up everyone's ass in trying to justify the banning of 'hate speech' by conservatives when her own party is at the cutting edge of hate speech just makes my head shake with disgust.
It was pretty apparent how they seriously think everyone thinks like them....
Twitter isn't the only mega Social Media platform I would regulate if I were in charge.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 10, 2019, 09:09:38 PM
Twitter isn't the only mega Social Media platform I would regulate if I were in charge.
I don't doubt it.
Quote from: taxed on March 10, 2019, 09:13:28 PM
I don't doubt it.
You don't think that if the roles were reversed, Liberals wouldn't want the same thing and worse?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 10, 2019, 09:29:12 PM
You don't think that if the roles were reversed, Liberals wouldn't want the same thing and worse?
I honestly think we'd be the ones defending them. We're the advocates for free speech, not them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81TgEaVpa2U
QuoteTotally right. The historical significance of an everyman journalist like Tim getting an absolute free shot at one of the most powerful people and organizations on the planet, and CRUSHING, is historic and will open eyes.
Quote from: taxed on March 10, 2019, 09:31:15 PM
I honestly think we'd be the ones defending them. We're the advocates for free speech, not them.
Yet companies like Twitter say they are. Of course everyone knows they are lying yet they do manage to pull the wall over people's eyes. If they were really for free speech and inclusion then they would allow a forum of open debate and discussion while policing both side with a fair and unbias point of view. Instead they sit back and they eliminate conservatives one by one based off their definition of 'hate speech' and try to claim they are fair.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on March 10, 2019, 09:51:44 PM
Yet companies like Twitter say they are. Of course everyone knows they are lying yet they do manage to pull the wall over people's eyes. If they were really for free speech and inclusion then they would allow a forum of open debate and discussion while policing both side with a fair and unbias point of view. Instead they sit back and they eliminate conservatives one by one based off their definition of 'hate speech' and try to claim they are fair.
It almost seems that they are surprised at how many people realize how full of shit they are. They were truly taken back a few times when Rogan said "he got banned for THAT?", after she looked at him for approval.
Quote from: taxed on March 10, 2019, 09:55:39 PM
It almost seems that they are surprised at how many people realize how full of shit they are. They were truly taken back a few times when Rogan said "he got banned for THAT?", after she looked at him for approval.
Exactly. Rogan is a good interviewer from what I saw in that video. She has convinced herself that she is doing gods work by doing what she is. Absolutely disgusting.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on March 10, 2019, 10:04:02 PM
Exactly. Rogan is a good interviewer from what I saw in that video. She has convinced herself that she is doing gods work by doing what she is. Absolutely disgusting.
He and Pool are leftists, so it's amazing they're the ones bringing this to the forefront.
Quote from: taxed on March 10, 2019, 10:10:16 PM
He and Pool are leftists, so it's amazing they're the ones bringing this to the forefront.
I don't watch Rogan enough to know his political standing but I will take your word that he is a leftists and say that it is very refreshing. Kind of goes to show that some people In the democratic party, as much as I might dislike their policy, are standing up for this.
Quote from: ConservativeInCT on March 10, 2019, 10:18:41 PM
I don't watch Rogan enough to know his political standing but I will take your word that he is a leftists and say that it is very refreshing. Kind of goes to show that some people In the democratic party, as much as I might dislike their policy, are standing up for this.
In the old days, they were just pushing stuff like welfare, higher taxes, trying to cut the military, etc... stuff that was stupid, but they agreed that men and women are different, people should be able to speak freely, etc....
Not sure if you're old enough to remember George Carlin, but he's a total lib. However, listen to this random clip and imagine him nowadays...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0aFPXr4n4
quote]Four liberals debating whether twitter is censoring conservatives.. and no conservative invited to the discussion. This is how censored we are.[/quote]
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 10, 2019, 10:44:39 PM
Four liberals debating whether twitter is censoring conservatives.. and no conservative invited to the discussion. This is how censored we are.
That particular discussion. Crowder has been pretty strong advancing against YouTube.
https://youtu.be/O7j8HGHxBLM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3iN8NVJewo
QuoteTwitter bans Conservatives for nothing, but allow liberals/leftists/communists etc to stay on the platform for clear policy violations.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lp5DVEOYN4
QuoteAnytime a social media executive speaks its safe to assume it's a lie.
Quote from: taxed on March 10, 2019, 10:47:34 PM
That particular discussion. Crowder has been pretty strong advancing against YouTube.
There was still no Conservatives in the conservation. That's what made that statement so true. I'm glad we had 1.5 Liberals fighting for us, but that is rare. Any other situation, it would be 4 Liberals enjoying that Conservatives are silenced.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 11, 2019, 09:41:24 AM
There was still no Conservatives in the conservation. That's what made that statement so true. I'm glad we had 1.5 Liberals fighting for us, but that is rare. Any other situation, it would be 4 Liberals enjoying that Conservatives are silenced.
True, not that conversation, but there those out there making a dent.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on March 11, 2019, 09:41:24 AM
There was still no Conservatives in the conservation. That's what made that statement so true. I'm glad we had 1.5 Liberals fighting for us, but that is rare. Any other situation, it would be 4 Liberals enjoying that Conservatives are silenced.
Here's a clip of Infowars debunking Gadde's lies about Jones' banning:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/TNqFUYEfNAHK/
Quote from: taxed on March 11, 2019, 07:04:52 PM
True, not that conversation, but there those out there making a dent.
I'm not complaining that he is on our side of this issue, but it was one of those epic comments I had to post.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxE5z-Sszgk
Quote"Fuck you for your feedback" is what she clearly meant. It was obvious during the livestream.
SoS, there's part of me that thinks social media censorship is a distraction. It's real, and it's a problem, but here's the real problem:
https://conservativehardliner.com/operation-choke-point-conservative-personal-bank-account-shut-down
We can start other ventures, raise money, etc., and attack, but not if they are cutting us off with the financial system. I'd be curious to your thoughts on this.
Quote from: taxed on March 11, 2019, 10:25:38 PM
SoS, there's part of me that thinks social media censorship is a distraction. It's real, and it's a problem, but here's the real problem:
https://conservativehardliner.com/operation-choke-point-conservative-personal-bank-account-shut-down
We can start other ventures, raise money, etc., and attack, but not if they are cutting us off with the financial system. I'd be curious to your thoughts on this.
I have heard about them doing this. I don't know.
Obviously, the almighty ruler in me would punish them as per the other thread. We have Constitutional rights. If they are not allowing us to exercise our Rights (purchase a fire arm, purchase a iPhone to Tweet, live as a free individual in this Republic as a citizen), then our actual Rights are being trampled on.
What do you think?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijwSlIwKFYw
QuoteWoah... Trump DENOUNCED Censorship Retweeted Paul Joseph Watson And Lauren Southern
"To those who think this censorship won't come for you next?! It's coming for us all if we don't stand against these big tech dictatorships!"
"The law doesn't need to change. These tech companies need to lose their status as neutral platforms and be reclassified as publishers, as that is what they have chosen to be now by curating their platforms.
If that happens it would not be long before the tech companies beg to return to being neutral platforms under the weight of all the litigation they'd be facing for things such as defamation which if they decide they want to carry on curating their platforms they should be liable for as publishers.
Make them choose; are they more similar to the phone companies or newspapers."
Tim Pool sounds like he was OK with NAZIs getting purged from social media.
I see PJW got kicked off FB.
I wonder how long until Soph is kicked off youtube. She is only 14 and is kicking some serious butt.
https://youtu.be/m7bplfghJMs
Quote from: taxed on May 04, 2019, 10:08:07 AM
Tim Pool sounds like he was OK with NAZIs getting purged from social media.
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 11:36:19 AM
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?
That's a bad thing if you truly care about free speech.
Quote from: taxed on May 06, 2019, 08:30:43 PM
That's a bad thing if you truly care about free speech.
Just wanted to confirm.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 11:36:19 AM
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?
When someone is trying to take something that doesn't belong to them, you don't destroy it and claim victory.
Here's the problem. The govt cannot interfere with the Bill of Rights, period, they have neither the Right or Power to effect Gods Law. Follow me?
So by demanding Govt step in and write laws Re: Free Speech, you just allowed the Fed the ability to usurp the power of the people via a document they never had any jurisdiction over.
The First Amendment belongs to the people, Period!
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 09:05:56 PM
Just wanted to confirm.
However, to circle back to the point you seem to disagree with, if a company has not benefited from government subsidies or help, then it can ban, censor, or do whatever it wants to its members, just like we can do here. If a cake baker doesn't want to bake a gay cake, he is free to not do so. However, if he took government money to build and grow his bakery, then yes, he better slap that dildo on top with some sprinkles just like the nice faggot asked.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 04, 2019, 09:53:03 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijwSlIwKFYw
"To those who think this censorship won't come for you next?! It's coming for us all if we don't stand against these big tech dictatorships!"
"The law doesn't need to change. These tech companies need to lose their status as neutral platforms and be reclassified as publishers, as that is what they have chosen to be now by curating their platforms.
If that happens it would not be long before the tech companies beg to return to being neutral platforms under the weight of all the litigation they'd be facing for things such as defamation which if they decide they want to carry on curating their platforms they should be liable for as publishers.
Make them choose; are they more similar to the phone companies or newspapers."
I recently heard that Congress passed laws giving these tech companies immunity from civil suits that one might file against corporations from torts done to them. This was done because they said they be a Public Square where everyone was welcome to meet and exchange views, so they ought not be held liable as merely providing the venue. As it turns out, this is not what they are and it is not what they do.
The Free Market could sort these things out if those who are deplatformed could sue for damages, but because Congress placed it's thumb on the scales, they can not sue.
These tech industries are far more like international cartels than American corporations and they use their power to undermine our government, our Constitution and our freedoms.
Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2019, 02:42:31 PM
However, to circle back to the point you seem to disagree with, if a company has not benefited from government subsidies or help, then it can ban, censor, or do whatever it wants to its members, just like we can do here. If a cake baker doesn't want to bake a gay cake, he is free to not do so. However, if he took government money to build and grow his bakery, then yes, he better slap that dildo on top with some sprinkles just like the nice faggot asked.
I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.
Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker. If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals. Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 03:38:42 PM
I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.
Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker. If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals. Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
I'll ask again, what do you propose as a remedy?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 03:38:42 PM
I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.
Irrelevant. Freedom is freedom. You don't have to do something you don't want to do.
Quote
Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker.
Government-enabled social media companies are not. Others are (Gab, Minds, etc).
Quote
If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals.
Irrelevant.
Quote
Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
I don't care about Twitter, until you show me they've been enabled by government. Facebook and Google/Youtube are the problems.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2019, 03:48:24 PM
I'll ask again, what do you propose as a remedy?
If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 04:25:07 PM
If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.
Again, what do you propose to fix it?
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 04:25:07 PM
If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.
Wow, you really aren't getting it, are you.
If they are big, they can discriminate. HOWEVER, if they have sucked from the government tit, as has Facebook, Google, and Youtube, then they need to be reigned in and their technology outsourced. At the least, they must not be allowed to discriminate.
Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2019, 05:09:41 PM
Again, what do you propose to fix it?
He seriously doesn't get the difference between a government-fed business versus a private company.
Quote from: taxed on May 08, 2019, 12:13:47 PM
He seriously doesn't get the difference between a government-fed business versus a private company.
Yeah, Google and the entire lot were built by DARPA and the CIA, we own them, they are not allowed to discriminate, while Twitter on the other hand, didn't suck from the Taxpayer teat, so they're free to do as they please.
All it would take is for Trump to dump Twitter and they'd collapse over night.
Quote from: Solar on May 08, 2019, 12:59:26 PM
Yeah, Google and the entire lot were built by DARPA and the CIA, we own them, they are not allowed to discriminate, while Twitter on the other hand, didn't suck from the Taxpayer teat, so they're free to do as they please.
All it would take is for Trump to dump Twitter and they'd collapse over night.
Exactly. A few whales moving to a new platform and everyone will follow... and it would snowball from there.
Quote from: taxed on May 08, 2019, 02:21:21 PM
Exactly. A few whales moving to a new platform and everyone will follow... and it would snowball from there.
Even the media would be forced to follow with their army of bots. :thumbsup:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbx81XfN67Y
QuoteJournalist Tim Pool discusses social media's clear bias against conservatives, calls for another 'Adpocalypse' and Vox...
Quote from: Sick Of Silence on June 05, 2019, 12:51:58 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbx81XfN67Y
Shoot I didnt see you posted this here already. I just put it in it's own thread. Should I get rid of that one?