Twitter Exec Is Questioned About "Learn to Code" Bannings

Started by Sick Of Silence, March 10, 2019, 04:12:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Sick Of Silence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijwSlIwKFYw

QuoteWoah... Trump DENOUNCED Censorship Retweeted Paul Joseph Watson And Lauren Southern

"To those who think this censorship won't come for you next?!  It's coming for us all if we don't stand against these big tech dictatorships!"

"The law doesn't need to change. These tech companies need to lose their status as neutral platforms and be reclassified as publishers, as that is what they have chosen to be now by curating their platforms.

If that happens it would not be long before the tech companies beg to return to being neutral platforms under the weight of all the litigation they'd be facing for things such as defamation which if they decide they want to carry on curating their platforms they should be liable for as publishers.

Make them choose; are they more similar to the phone companies or newspapers."
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

taxed

Tim Pool sounds like he was OK with NAZIs getting purged from social media.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

patentlymn


I see PJW got kicked off FB.
I wonder how long until Soph is kicked off youtube. She is only 14 and is kicking some serious butt.

https://youtu.be/m7bplfghJMs

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: taxed on May 04, 2019, 10:08:07 AM
Tim Pool sounds like he was OK with NAZIs getting purged from social media.

Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

taxed

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 11:36:19 AM
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?

That's a bad thing if you truly care about free speech.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

Sick Of Silence

With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 11:36:19 AM
Is that a good thing or a bad thing? Who decides who they are?
When someone is trying to take something that doesn't belong to them, you don't destroy it and claim victory.

Here's the problem. The govt cannot interfere with the Bill of Rights, period, they have neither the Right or Power to effect Gods Law. Follow me?
So by demanding Govt step in and write laws Re: Free Speech, you just allowed the Fed the ability to usurp the power of the people via a document they never had any jurisdiction over.

The First Amendment belongs to the people, Period!
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

taxed

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 06, 2019, 09:05:56 PM
Just wanted to confirm.

However, to circle back to the point you seem to disagree with, if a company has not benefited from government subsidies or help, then it can ban, censor, or do whatever it wants to its members, just like we can do here.  If a cake baker doesn't want to bake a gay cake, he is free to not do so.  However, if he took government money to build and grow his bakery, then yes, he better slap that dildo on top with some sprinkles just like the nice faggot asked.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

wally

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 04, 2019, 09:53:03 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ijwSlIwKFYw

"To those who think this censorship won't come for you next?!  It's coming for us all if we don't stand against these big tech dictatorships!"

"The law doesn't need to change. These tech companies need to lose their status as neutral platforms and be reclassified as publishers, as that is what they have chosen to be now by curating their platforms.

If that happens it would not be long before the tech companies beg to return to being neutral platforms under the weight of all the litigation they'd be facing for things such as defamation which if they decide they want to carry on curating their platforms they should be liable for as publishers.

Make them choose; are they more similar to the phone companies or newspapers."
I recently heard that Congress passed laws giving these tech companies immunity from civil suits that one might file against corporations from  torts done to them.  This was done because they said they be a Public Square where everyone was welcome to meet and exchange views, so they ought not be held liable as merely providing the venue.  As it turns out, this is not what they are and it is not what they do.

The Free Market could sort these things out if those who are deplatformed could sue for damages, but because Congress placed it's thumb on the scales, they can not sue.

These tech industries are far more like international cartels than American corporations and they use their power to undermine our government, our Constitution and our freedoms.

The press is our chief ideological weapon.
~ Nikita Khrushchev

Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them.

~Ronald Reagan

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: taxed on May 07, 2019, 02:42:31 PM
However, to circle back to the point you seem to disagree with, if a company has not benefited from government subsidies or help, then it can ban, censor, or do whatever it wants to its members, just like we can do here.  If a cake baker doesn't want to bake a gay cake, he is free to not do so.  However, if he took government money to build and grow his bakery, then yes, he better slap that dildo on top with some sprinkles just like the nice faggot asked.

I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.

Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker. If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals. Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 03:38:42 PM
I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.

Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker. If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals. Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
I'll ask again, what do you propose as a remedy?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

taxed

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 03:38:42 PM
I wouldn't necessarily not make someone a cake just because of religion. I do support their stance to do that as a fundamental right of private business. Not everybody is fully religious.
Irrelevant.  Freedom is freedom. You don't have to do something you don't want to do.

Quote
Social media companies are not the same as some no-name baker.
Government-enabled social media companies are not.  Others are (Gab, Minds, etc).

Quote
If that baker puts a Trump sign in their window, it doesn't mean they are not going to serve Liberals.
Irrelevant.

Quote
Since Twitter and the like have put Obama/Hillary/Bernie "signs" in their boardroom, they are not serving Conservatives the same as they are Liberals. They controlling what people say on an open social media platform.
I don't care about Twitter, until you show me they've been enabled by government. Facebook and Google/Youtube are the problems.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon

Sick Of Silence

Quote from: Solar on May 07, 2019, 03:48:24 PM
I'll ask again, what do you propose as a remedy?

If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.
With all these lawyers with cameras on the street i'm shocked we have so much crime in the world.

There is constitutional law and there is law and order. This challenge to law and order is always the start to loosing our constitutional rights.

Frauditors are a waste of life.

Solar

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 04:25:07 PM
If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.

Again, what do you propose to fix it?
Official Trump Cult Member

#WWG1WGA

Q PATRIOT!!!

taxed

Quote from: Sick Of Silence on May 07, 2019, 04:25:07 PM
If some nobody business can't discriminate, then this big business can't discriminate.

Wow, you really aren't getting it, are you.

If they are big, they can discriminate.  HOWEVER, if they have sucked from the government tit, as has Facebook, Google, and Youtube, then they need to be reigned in and their technology outsourced.  At the least, they must not be allowed to discriminate.
#PureBlood #TrumpWon